Aruba Remote Access Points vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.2% mindshare in EIV, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Aruba Remote Access Points

Read 21 Aruba Remote Access Points reviews

1,472 Views
1,472 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Read 65 Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks reviews

20,092 Views
4,018 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Aruba Remote Access Points

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Aruba Remote Access Points compete in the remote network access category. Prisma Access has an edge with its security features, while Aruba is preferred for its ease of use and quick deployment.

Features: Prisma Access offers robust security, seamless cloud integration, and comprehensive threat prevention. Aruba provides effective network connectivity, user-friendly interface, and reliable performance.

Room for Improvement: Prisma Access needs better configuration flexibility, improved integration, and reduced complexity. Aruba should enhance security features, increase compatibility with third-party devices, and improve advanced management options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Access deployment is detailed and time-consuming, but customer support is highly regarded. Aruba's deployment is straightforward and quick, though customer support is less responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Prisma Access has higher initial setup costs with significant long-term ROI due to advanced capabilities. Aruba offers budget-friendly setup with faster return thanks to minimal initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Remote Access Points

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (4th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (1st), ZTNA as a Service (5th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Aruba Remote Access Points is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is 6.3%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	6.3%
Aruba Remote Access Points	1.2%
Other	92.5%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

Theesula Majuwanagamage

Head Of ELV and ICT at Intec Systems Solution Pvt Ltd

Efficient Setup and Strong Performance Highlight Versatile Capabilities

In terms of areas for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points, when planning for the customer's end, you need to highlight the precautions against EMF emissions and environmental emissions, as well as power management limitations. If the user is in one direction and you're transmitting everywhere, that's not good power management. Currently, all access points provide the same power requirement to the client, but we should explore what extra mile we can go. We are facing energy crises and climate issues, along with GHG and SDGs protocols. If we highlight the alignment with these protocols, it can enhance the product quality as an environmentally friendly option. Apart from that, service-wise, every unit is the same. Users can only distinguish those requirements using spectrum analyzers; otherwise, minor data delays of one or two seconds do not matter, but for high-security or high-speed needs, it becomes significant.

Read full review

IgorPinter

Director at PULSEC

Zero-trust access has improved remote security and now simplifies cloud-based firewall management

Regarding the integration part for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, the integration with identity providers is pretty much good. It is basically firewall as a service, so it performs well. I completed the integration without any issues. What Palo Alto Networks can do better for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is probably to have the point of presence available in more locations. The point of presence from the Serbia region has the nearest POP in Frankfurt, which is an issue since it is your gateway—when you start browsing the internet, you go through a commercial connection in Germany. They definitely need to spread the service in other countries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Once we got things set up properly, we just need to do updates, and it just runs."

"It's easy to manage."

"Aruba works well in large spaces, especially for manufacturing. That's when you start seeing the effectiveness of Aruba."

"The most valuable feature of Aruba Remote Access Points is the manageability from the central cloud platform."

"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."

"The stability and performance of Aruba Remote Access Points with minimal issues in an IT environment are worth a recommendation."

"The most valuable features of Aruba Remote Access Points are the easy configuration, straightforward installation, and secure security features."

"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."

More Aruba Remote Access Points pros

"The solution also provides traffic analysis, threat prevention, URL filtering, and segmentation. That combination is important because it enhances the protection and makes the traffic more secure. It also keeps things more up-to-date, enabling us to deal with more of the current threats."

"Overall, the security that Prisma Access provides definitely meets our security requirements."

"Speaking as an ambassador for Palo Alto and Prisma access, it's the best solution on the market."

"The solution improved the consistency of our security controls and the BCP, there has been a 20 percent reduction in TCO, and Prisma Access also enabled us to deliver better applications by centralizing security management."

"Prisma Access is very stable, and I am very much satisfied with its stability, rating it nine to ten out of ten."

"The tool's consolidation is pretty quick."

"The crux of why we're using the product is because of the automations, and we are very confident that the product will keep us secure at all times."

"Overall, the security provided by Prisma Access is very good."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pros

Cons

"The remote access point coverage should be bigger than it is now."

"It would help if the remote APs had some kind of SoHo environment with built-in firewall features. That way it could connect directly in a client-to-site type of environment, or a site-to-site VPN environment. That way users could have a complete office setup without coming to the private cloud."

"Our difficulty with Aruba is that the product and the license are two different items. So, if we are adding an access point, we have to pay for two items. We have to pay to add the access point in the controller and we have to pay for the license."

"I use the controller when using Aruba Remote Access Points, particularly during configuration. Hence, room for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points is for its web UI to be easier to control."

"It could have better monitoring features. Not all features are available on the monitoring dashboard."

"In terms of areas for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points, when planning for the customer's end, you need to highlight the precautions against EMF emissions and environmental emissions, as well as power management limitations."

"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."

"The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved."

More Aruba Remote Access Points cons

"Sometimes a third-party outage could impact the whole operability."

"The solution needs to be more compatible with other solutions. This is specifically a problem for us when it comes to healthcare applications. They have proprietary connection types and things of that nature that make compatibility a challenge sometimes."

"I would like to see support for custom applications."

"From any improvement perspective, the product's compatibility issues with Linux need to be resolved."

"One area for improvement is for them to stay on top of keeping their CVEs on their platform up to date."

"Pricing for Prisma Access and Prisma SD WAN is high due to the need for different hardware flavors like IONs."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"I would like the solution to support a different type of authentication. We can't configure a secondary method for our portal."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no other expenses than standard licenses for the product."

"In terms of pricing, we've found Aruba's offerings to be very competitive."

"Aruba pricing is not very high. They offer competitive pricing for what they provide."

"Aruba Remote Access Points' pricing is good and affordable."

"The price of Aruba Remote Access Points could be better. It is a little expensive."

"Price-wise, Aruba Remote Access Points is in the middle, so my rating for its pricing is three out of five."

"You require no separate licensing to convert an access point to RAP."

"Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it."

"Based on what I have heard from others, it is a pricey solution as compared to its peers, but I am not sure. However, considering the features that it offers, it is a break-even point. You get whatever they are promising."

"The solution requires a license and the technical support has extra costs. The licensing model could improve."

"Compared to other products, the price is slightly high."

"There's no reason not to buy the enterprise version that gives you unlimited PoPs, but you must understand the limitations you impose on yourself if you do that. If you go crazy, that allowlist will be too big for Kubernetes clusters."

"Prisma Access is a little bit expensive."

"The licensing model for this product is complicated and changes all the time, making it very hard for the user to comprehend the configuration."

"It is a little expensive. Because it is one of the best in the market, it is a little bit more expensive than other vendors."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Construction Company

11%

Government

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Remote Access Points?

This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Remote Access Points?

We do not use Zero Touch Provisioning with Aruba Remote Access Points because the Aruba device being expensive compared to cheaper Cisco options holds us back.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Remote Access Points?

The device requires reconfiguration if we use a standalone setup because the battery fault leads to all configurations resetting. This is a significant area for improvement, especially when the dev...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

From my experience, Palo Alto is more expensive compared to solutions like Netskope and Triscale.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba VPN vs Aruba Remote Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Zyxel VPN Client vs Aruba Remote Access Points

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Aruba Remote Access Points

Compared 13% of the time

Hillstone E-Series vs Aruba Remote Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Tailscale vs Aruba Remote Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Aruba Remote Access Points Competitors

Netskope vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

FortiSASE vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Remote Access Points

May 2026

Download Aruba Remote Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks report

Download Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks product report

Also Known As

Aruba RAP

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma Access

Overview

Aruba Remote Access Points provide seamless connectivity and secure remote access for distant sites, ensuring efficient management and reliable performance.

Offering ease of configuration and scalable deployment, Aruba Remote Access Points guarantee private remote office environments. Utilizing advanced filtering and centralized management, these access points deliver flexible integration and strong security. Despite needing improvements in web UI simplicity and enhanced AI capabilities, they stand out in cost-effectiveness and customer support excellence. Enhancements in cloud features, monitoring tools, and power management could further enhance its performance.

What are the key features of Aruba Remote Access Points?

Secure Connectivity: Ensures safe remote access to corporate networks
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and control
Scalable Integration: Adapts to growing enterprise needs
Seamless Deployment: Facilitates quick and easy setup

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable with consolidated expenses
Intuitive Scaling: Easily accommodate expanding connections
Reliable Performance: Consistently high network stability
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent customer service

Aruba Remote Access Points are widely implemented across industries such as construction, warehousing, and government facilities. They provide essential VPN and ERP connectivity, enhancing remote work capabilities and managing office networks through centralized controllers, making them indispensable for secure communication and network management.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks delivers robust security features including secure remote access across apps and traffic monitoring. It integrates smoothly with cloud environments to provide advanced threat protection and visibility into network traffic.

Prisma Access offers a comprehensive suite of security tools designed to protect cloud environments and remote workforces. With its focus on real-time risk identification and threat prevention, Prisma Access provides encrypted tunnels and centralized management for seamless connectivity and enhanced data security. Designed to scale across platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP, it optimizes traffic and connectivity while offering extensive visibility into vulnerabilities. However, integration with third-party products, usability, and support services are areas for development, as users report interface challenges and desire improved scalability and geographic coverage, especially in regions like China and South America.

What are the key features of Prisma Access?

Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects and manages potential threats instantly.
Secure Remote Access: Ensures secure connectivity to applications from anywhere.
Traffic Monitoring: Provides comprehensive oversight of network traffic.
Seamless Integration: Works well with platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Firewall Capabilities: Blocks unauthorized access and threats.
Scalability: Adapts to various cloud environments to meet growing demands.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Prisma Access?

Reduced Data Breach Risk: Protects sensitive information through encrypted connections.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and configuration tasks.
Centralized Management: Offers a single view for managing all security policies.
Advanced Threat Protection: Regular updates guard against new threats.

Prisma Access is effectively used in industries requiring secure remote access and stringent data protection, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations leverage it to enforce Zero Trust policies, optimize network performance with SD-WAN, and ensure security compliance across multiple platforms.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Trafford Metropolitan Borough

Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of Chilliwack

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Free Report: Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.