Ataccama ONE Platform vs Atlan comparison

Read 8 Atlan reviews

1,456 Views
1,427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Ataccama ONE Platform and Atlan are competing products focused on data management and collaboration within organizations. Atlan has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, making it a preferred choice despite Ataccama’s more appealing pricing and support options.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform offers automated data quality, governance capabilities, and MDM integration. Atlan distinguishes itself with collaborative data workspaces, metadata management, and agile data workflows. Atlan emphasizes collaboration and metadata flexibility, offering an advantage for teams needing cross-functional data operations.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE requires enhancements in user experience and flexibility in deployment methods. Improvements in real-time collaboration features could benefit Ataccama’s offering. Additionally, strengthening integration with non-standard data sources could enhance Ataccama's adaptability. Atlan could improve by refining user multilingual support and providing more extensive training resources for first-time users. It's also beneficial for Atlan to enhance offline access to its functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform delivers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support focusing on system integration. Atlan offers a cloud-based deployment model that reduces implementation time and enhances team collaboration, with responsive customer service tailored for cloud-centric environments.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE provides competitive pricing with structured models, delivering a favorable ROI through effective cost management. Atlan's setup costs are higher, yet the comprehensive feature set and collaboration capabilities justify this, offering significant ROI for organizations prioritizing team-driven data initiatives.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Atlan Report (Updated: December 2025).

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Atlan

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (4th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th), AI Observability (39th)

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Atlan is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ataccama ONE Platform	2.3%
Atlan	2.1%
Other	95.6%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Akhil Danturti

Data Governance Analyst at Entain India

Streamlines reusable data quality rules and has highlighted the need for richer logic and documentation

I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was not that great around 2020 when I started working with it. There can still be more features including writing any logic, improving more keywords for logic building, and enhancing address validation, based on my understanding. User experience is actually good; I do not have any complaints or feedback on that. However, the documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool. If anything is needed for understanding, you have to rely on documentation. Ataccama's documentation has potential for improvement.

Read full review

Peter Neumann

IT consultant at Pathfinder

Has struggled to meet business needs but supports technical data exploration and transparency

Atlan can be improved by concentrating more on business data since it is developed from developers for developers, and it needs to be more business relevant. For instance, when re-importing data model diagrams, Atlan provides some diagram automation that is not connected to the business glossary, which I consider a significant fault. Atlan needs to improve by focusing more on the business side of data, not only on technical aspects.If you want to focus on technical considerations, it would be beneficial to have an interface with a real business data modeling tool such as Erwin or other business data tools, since data modeling is not the same as Draw.io. Additionally, Atlan can improve its workflows, which are hard to understand. Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team. If business people want to use it and run their own reports, it must be easier to customize for their business needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"At the beginning, we had almost 80 percent data quality, and after using Ataccama ONE Platform, we reached 90 percent."

"Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted our organization because before its implementation, completing tasks such as more than 100 or thousands of rules took more than a week, and now we complete those tasks in less than two or three days due to the automation and one-time task capability."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"Ataccama ONE Platform goes to some large corporations, we are using it for very big data, there is a lot of data being processed by Ataccama in our organization, and it is very good in scalability."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

More Ataccama ONE Platform pros

"The technical support services are good."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"Atlan has positively impacted the organization since it helps in discovering already available assets, allowing for reduction of redundant ingestion of external data and reduction of time to market for any project."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"Atlan is helpful for identifying datasets and discovering PI data, such as the classification levels of datasets (gold, silver, bronze)."

More Atlan pros

Cons

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"I have heard that the licensing and setup costs are quite high, especially if we try to connect for a support call."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I think the algorithms used in Ataccama ONE Platform need to be defined more and more to figure out things much more perfectly than they are now."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"I would not say Ataccama ONE Platform is one hundred percent stable. I would rate it at seventy percent stable."

More Ataccama ONE Platform cons

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications."

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team."

More Atlan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

My main use case for Ataccama ONE Platform is to develop data quality rules, apply them in the monitoring project, and then triage the issues with the data quality rules. For example, we had a proj...

What advice do you have for others considering Ataccama ONE Platform?

Ataccama ONE Platform was on-premise before but has moved to a hybrid cloud now. Ataccama ONE Platform integrates with other tools or systems in my organization. Ataccama ONE Platform connects with...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

Atlas is competitively priced compared to other data governance platforms like Collibra and Informatica. The only major drawback is its lack of an integrated data quality module.

What needs improvement with Atlan?

Atlan can be improved by integrating agents that can support users in finding assets of interest.

What is your primary use case for Atlan?

Atlan is used as a data catalog and a data governance tool. The primary idea for implementing Atlan for data cataloging in day-to-day work was to create a business data catalog to support asset dis...

Semarchy xDM vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Atlan

Compared 37% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Atlan

Compared 16% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 12% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Atlan

Compared 9% of the time

BigID Next vs Atlan

Compared 4% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

Product Reports

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Ataccama ONE Platform

January 2026

Download Atlan product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

No data available

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available