Atlan vs Quest Data Intelligence comparison

Atlan and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quest Software is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. Atlan holds a 1.8% mindshare in DG, compared to Quest Software’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 10 Atlan reviews

2,625 Views
2,520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest Data Intelligence

Read 22 Quest Data Intelligence reviews

3,922 Views
3,765 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atlan

Quest Data Intelligence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 16, 2026

Erwin Data Intelligence and Atlan compete in the data management solutions category. Erwin seems to have an advantage in centralized data management, while Atlan excels in automation and user-friendly interfaces.

Features: Erwin Data Intelligence integrates smart data connectors and metadata associations, providing a single source of truth and enhancing organizational efficiency. Its data lineage feature reduces silos and facilitates adaptation across enterprise environments. Atlan offers seamless integrations and extensive automation with an intuitive interface, which makes it easy for business users to adopt and manage metadata efficiently. Atlan’s automated data pipeline enhances data navigation and consolidation, making essential business processes smoother.

Room for Improvement: Erwin Data Intelligence needs improvements in automation scripts and SDK/API accuracy. Modernizing the user interface and enhancing workflow integrations are also needed. Atlan could benefit from enhanced API documentation and a more robust governance framework. Faster support response times and improved data observability would further enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Data Intelligence supports hybrid, on-premises, and cloud deployments, featuring reliable but sometimes slow customer service. Premium support options are available for timely resolutions. Atlan offers similar deployment options but stands out with a responsive helpdesk, comparable to in-house service levels, enhancing day-to-day operations through rapid assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Data Intelligence is considered cost-effective, offering comprehensive governance features with a focus on reducing labor costs and increasing process efficiency. Atlan’s pricing, based on user count, is favorable for mid-sized organizations, offering a cost-effective alternative to platforms like Collibra. Both products showcase significant ROI by optimizing data handling efficiency and supporting automation efforts.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Quest Data Intelligence

Ranking in Data Governance

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Governance (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 1.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest Data Intelligence is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atlan	1.8%
erwin Data Intelligence	2.1%
Other	96.1%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Peter Neumann

IT consultant at Pathfinder

Has struggled to meet business needs but supports technical data exploration and transparency

Atlan can be improved by concentrating more on business data since it is developed from developers for developers, and it needs to be more business relevant. For instance, when re-importing data model diagrams, Atlan provides some diagram automation that is not connected to the business glossary, which I consider a significant fault. Atlan needs to improve by focusing more on the business side of data, not only on technical aspects.If you want to focus on technical considerations, it would be beneficial to have an interface with a real business data modeling tool such as Erwin or other business data tools, since data modeling is not the same as Draw.io. Additionally, Atlan can improve its workflows, which are hard to understand. Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team. If business people want to use it and run their own reports, it must be easier to customize for their business needs.

Read full review

Jog Raj

Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automated lineage and business glossaries have improved data understanding and collaboration

I am open to answering a few questions about erwin Data Intelligence and sharing my opinion about the product. Regarding the analytic part of the product, I find it very interesting that erwin Data Intelligence has its own inbuilt reporting toolset, with a new version coming out in January that will be AI-powered. This means you will be able to write analytical reports and questions based on the metadata and data lineage, making it more powerful than the current version, as AI will assist in creating those reports and performing analysis on the metadata. I find that the time taken to realize value from erwin Data Intelligence can be quite long. Creating a data catalog and developing data lineage takes significant time, and I expect that AI will help accelerate the process of creating data products by streamlining the steps involved. I can recommend erwin Data Intelligence to other users. I would rate this review as an eight out of ten overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"The technical support services are good."

"Atlas is quite intuitive."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"Overall, I rate Atlan a nine out of ten."

"By switching to Atlan, we have increased our productivity and saved a lot of business time."

More Atlan pros

"This tool has taken us from having nothing to being very efficient."

"There is a wide range of widgets that enables the user to find the proper information quickly. The presentation of information is something very valuable."

"The automated data lineage and impact analysis being driven from the mapping documents are astounding in reducing the time to research impact analysis from six to 16 weeks down to minutes, because it's a couple of clicks with a mouse."

"The possibility to write automation scripts is the biggest benefit for us. We have several products with metadata and metadata mapping capabilities. The big difference when we were choosing this product was the ability to run automation scripts against metadata and metadata mappings. Right now, we have a very high level of automation based on these automation scripts, so it's really the core feature for us."

"We always know where our data is, and anybody can look that up, whether they're a business person who doesn't know anything about Informatica, or a developer who knows everything about creating data movement jobs in Informatica, but who does not understand the business terminology or the data that is being used in the tool."

"The solution gives us data lineage which means we can see an impact if we make a change. The ability for us to have that in this company is brilliant because we used to have 49 data stewards from some 23 different groups within six major departments. Each one of those was a silo unto itself. The ability to have different glossaries — but all pointed to the same key terms, key concepts, or key attributes — has made life really simple."

"The client is thrilled with higher quality, lower-cost products, and the services."

"The interface is easy to use. I also like Erwin's automatic data classification and data quality checks."

More Quest Data Intelligence pros

Cons

"Customer support for Atlan is not so proactive."

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"In my experience, it might be less suited for collaboration across teams."

More Atlan cons

"There are a lot of little things like moving between read screens and edit screens. Those little human interface type of programming pieces will need to mature a bit to make it easier to get to where you want to go to put the stuff in."

"The metadata ingestion is very nice because of the ability to automate it. It would be nice to be able to do this ingestion, or set it up, from one place, instead of having to set it up separately for every data asset that is ingested."

"We chose to implement on an Oracle Database because we also had the erwin Data Modeler and Web Portal products in-house, which have been set up on Oracle Databases for many years. Sometimes the Oracle Database installation has caused some hiccups that wouldn't necessarily have been caused if we had used SQL Server."

"There were some issues when drawing the data models. If you have more than 500 or 600 tables, it takes a long time to display those in the right position on the screen."

"The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license."

"If we are talking about the business side of the product, maybe the Data Literacy could be made a bit simpler. You have to put your hands on it, so there is room for improvement."

"Another area where it can improve is by having BB-Graph-type databases where relationship discovery and relationship identification are much easier."

"The solution's Arabic language processing is limited. The results are limited when you use the interface in Arabic."

More Quest Data Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

"There is an additional fee for the server maintenance."

"Smart Data Connectors have some costs, and then there are user-based licenses. We spend roughly $150,000 per year on the solution. It is a yearly subscription license that basically includes the cost for Smart Data Connectors and user-based licenses. We have around 30 data stewards who maintain definitions, and then we have five IT users who basically maintain the overall solution. It is not a SaaS kind of operation, and there is an infrastructure cost to host this solution, which is our regular AWS hosting cost."

"erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."

"You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in."

"I am not very familiar with its pricing. I know it is not cheap, but it is also not super expensive. It depends on the company size. For a company making $1 million, it is very expensive. For a company making 10 million and above, it might be okay."

"The price is reasonable and competitive. When you get into forward and reverse-engineering, the cost could go up. However, if you are a large organization, you would probably be able to access different packages. If, however, you don't need forward and reverse-engineering, then the price is relatively cheap."

"The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required."

"We operate on a yearly subscription and because it is an enterprise license we only have one. It is not dependent on the number of users."

More Quest Data Intelligence pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the licensing cost is a bit flexible but not affordable for smaller organizations. It might be way out of their budget, but it is very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

Atlan can be improved by enhancing their support process by reducing the resolution time. They have really bad and incomplete documentation, so they should work on the documentation as well, especi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atlan?

My main use case for Atlan is to define a flexible set of metadata, including measuring the quality of said data. Atlan is also a partner of ours, so we use it to integrate with our own tool. It al...

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

In my opinion, the analytics part of erwin Data Intelligence is not satisfactory. The name 'Intelligence' is not related specifically to analytics; it is focused on data governance with no advanced...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

My main use case for erwin Data Intelligence is applying it and the DQ Labs in a financial institution.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The integration of business glossaries has significantly helped improve collaboration in our organization. We define the business glossaries first during meetings with the business, and then we bul...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Atlan

Compared 17% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Atlan

Compared 12% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 12% of the time

Dawiso vs Atlan

Compared 10% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Atlan

Compared 3% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

Collibra Platform vs Quest Data Intelligence

Compared 20% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Quest Data Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Quest Data Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Quest Data Intelligence

Compared 7% of the time

Global Data Excellence DEMS vs Quest Data Intelligence

Compared 5% of the time

More Quest Data Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

July 2026

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Data Intelligence

July 2026

Download Quest Data Intelligence product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance, erwin Data Catalog

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Atlan

erwin Data Intelligence is a comprehensive platform for metadata management, data cataloging, and governance. It enables organizations to gain insights, improve traceability, and streamline compliance through its advanced features.

Focusing on data lineage, metadata repositories, and seamless integrations, erwin Data Intelligence provides a unified perspective of enterprise data. Its robust capabilities include Smart Data Connectors for automation, efficient data visualization with mind maps, and adaptable metadata properties. While the platform integrates well into existing systems, areas for improvement include automation, SDK inconsistencies, and the need for better data quality assessments. Use cases highlight its importance in enhancing business data models and regulatory compliance.

What are the key features of erwin Data Intelligence?

Single Source of Truth: Centralizes data for consistent information across the organization.
Smart Data Connectors: Automate connections to data sources, enhancing efficiency.
Data Lineage: Tracks data pathways for better traceability and understanding.
Business Glossaries: Enables clear definitions and shared vocabulary for all users.
Metadata Management: Streamlines metadata organization and retrieval.
Impact Analysis: Assesses implications of data changes rapidly and accurately.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation scripts reduce manual processes and increase productivity.
Improved Data Visualization: Mind maps facilitate an intuitive understanding of complex data.
Customizable Properties: Adapt metadata attributes to fit specific organizational requirements.
Unified View: Offers a comprehensive perspective of data governance practices.

Industries implementing erwin Data Intelligence often focus on mapping data sources and integrating governance with ETL tools. This supports comprehensive data management strategies, enabling business teams to better locate, understand, and utilize data effectively. Its application in metadata management and automated reporting is particularly valuable in sectors requiring stringent regulatory compliance.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence

June 2026

Free Report: Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. Quest Data Intelligence report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors and best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.