Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AttackIQ vs FireCompass comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
8th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (56th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (25th)
FireCompass
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
17th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (23rd), Penetration Testing Services (39th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (47th), Security Analytics (15th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 7.0%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FireCompass is 0.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AttackIQ7.0%
FireCompass0.8%
Other92.2%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797743 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Development Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Continuous attack simulations have improved real-world threat detection and response skills
The best features AttackIQ offers include being a cybersecurity platform specializing in breach attack simulation and AEF validation, as it tests the organization's defenses by simulating real-world attack behavior, which are aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, providing a platform where I can run real-world attack scenarios and identify and mitigate them. AttackIQ is well-aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework and has strong continuous validation. The platform is built to run continuous and automation tests, which helps during point-in-time checks or reduces blind spots. AttackIQ positively impacts my organization as most of my colleagues and seniors have been using it to understand real-world attack scenarios and how to cope with those situations, benefiting the company, colleagues, and team. After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things. It has definitely benefited the organization in terms of faster risk identification and faster response times.
Use FireCompass?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

DeepSurface
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Zafran Security and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.