Auth0 Platform vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

Okta and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. Okta is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3. Okta holds a 8.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Auth0 Platform

Read 19 Auth0 Platform reviews

4,966 Views
2,880 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,071 Views
985 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Auth0 Platform

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Oracle Access Manager and Auth0 Platform compete in the identity and access management category, with Auth0 having an upper hand due to its broad feature set and flexible solutions that attract technology-driven users.

Features: Oracle Access Manager offers robust security, comprehensive identity management, and efficient management of applications across various platforms. Auth0 provides flexible integration, extensive social media logins, and easy-to-use developer SDKs.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Access Manager could improve by simplifying its deployment process, offering more cloud-based features, and enhancing support for smaller organizations. Auth0 could benefit from expanding customer service options, reducing complexity in multi-tenancy management, and enhancing customization for enterprise-scale environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Access Manager requires extensive setup and continuous maintenance, making it suitable for large enterprises but challenging for rapid scaling. Auth0 simplifies deployment through cloud-based solutions and provides effective customer support focused on agile methodologies and scaling needs.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Access Manager typically incurs higher initial setup costs due to its detailed enterprise-level offerings, which can extend the time to achieve ROI. Auth0, with a more scalable pricing model, allows for quicker ROI realization with lower up-front investments, suitable for organizations prioritizing cost-effectiveness and growth alignment.

To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auth0 Platform

Ranking in Access Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), AI IT Support (8th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Auth0 Platform is 8.0%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.2%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Auth0 Platform	8.0%
Oracle Access Manager	2.2%
Other	89.8%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Vishal Chopade

Senior Software Engineer at Charter Communications

Secure API access for enterprises has improved and provides dynamic authentication for users

The best features Auth0 offers are its scalability and it is a better way of authenticating a user compared to just a tokenized version of authentication where the token is static and does not offer dynamic authentication compared to how Auth0 offers it. While working in a dynamic environment where there are many enterprises involved in the service, you need a tool that can authenticate them on the go, which is why I like it. Auth0 has positively impacted my organization. Previously we used the tokenized version of authentication. The work was simple, but when you push this code to deployment and enterprises are involved, it makes much more sense to authenticate them through Auth0 so that you can just get a login for yourself when you are authenticated, which helps to dynamically scale depending on the product and its viability. The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize.

Read full review

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."

"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."

"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."

"The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize."

"It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app."

"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."

"The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients."

"Auth0 has the best support ever."

More Auth0 Platform pros

"The product was built to be scalable."

"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."

"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."

"The solution is able to save time and resources for my clients."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"Overall, I rate Oracle Access Manager nine out of ten for its extensive capabilities."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced."

"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile."

"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."

"There are indeed areas where the product could improve. For instance, Okta offers various application configurations, enabling access management, which the tool could consider implementing."

"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."

"If you’re not a developer, you need to spend time exploring more."

"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."

"The pricing should be lower. A reduction of 20-25% would be great."

More Auth0 Platform cons

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"The user interface is a bit complicated and could be made more lightweight. Simplifying the installation process, perhaps through a VDAR-based installation, would also be beneficial."

"Installation and deployment take time, but implementation is straightforward and easy, and they have very good support."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

"The technical support is not very good at all."

"I suggest Oracle make the integration process for non-Oracle applications as straightforward and easy as it is for Oracle applications."

"In other products, we can customize on the GUI end, whereas in Oracle, we need to take a backup of the JAR file and then customize it...and during this process, sometimes the WebLogic admin console will go down, which will impact the process."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."

"The tool is cheaper compared to competing solutions. Those alternatives tended to be more expensive. Consequently, Okta purchased it because it was considerably cheaper. The solution even offered some free services while still providing excellent functionality."

"It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."

"There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."

"I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."

"The product is a little expensive."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The tool is affordable."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auth0?

It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?

The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auth0?

I do not think there are any improvements needed for Auth0, other than maybe making it more visible to beginners. Auth0 could be made more accessible to beginners.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Okta Platform vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra External ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Auth0 Platform Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform

January 2026

Download Auth0 Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

January 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Overview

Auth0 Platform utilizes JWT-based authentication and supports over 30 social logins, enabling integration with various codebases. Known for robust security, compliance, and scalability, it's tailored for enterprises needing customizable, efficient authentication solutions.

Auth0 Platform is a comprehensive identity management system used for customer, business-to-business, and API authentication across cloud infrastructures like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It simplifies user logins and identity management with features like Single Sign-On, identity federation, and multi-tenancy. Enterprises rely on it for its dynamic authentication capabilities and efficient management of user roles. However, areas for enhancement include authorization features, flexible pricing for small developers, and enhanced documentation for machine-to-machine authentication. Improving multi-tenancy support and customizable login experiences could elevate its appeal.

What are the key features of Auth0 Platform?

JWT-Based Authentication: Simplifies infrastructure with secure token-based access.
Social Logins: Supports over 30 social platforms for seamless user experiences.
Customizability: Tailors authentication flows to meet enterprise specifications.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds layers of security to authentication processes.
API Integration: Facilitates robust connections between applications and services.
User-Friendly Documentation: Provides clear guidance for developers implementing Auth0 features.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Auth0?

Scalability: Handles growth while maintaining performance.
Security Compliance: Meets multiple regulatory requirements with ease.
Integration Flexibility: Adapts to diverse environments and codebases.
Enhanced User Management: Offers tools for efficient user role handling.
Dynamic Authentication Processes: Accommodates varying enterprise authentication needs.

In industries deploying Auth0 Platform, such as cloud-based service providers and enterprises using API-driven architectures, its implementation focuses on secure and seamless user logins. Many leverage its readiness for scaling authentication processes and its extensibility, including support for Single Sign-On and identity federation, to create streamlined user experiences across businesses. Expanding multi-factor authentication beyond traditional methods and refining social login integrations are common approaches to address specific industry needs.

Okta

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2025

Free Report: Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auth0 Platform vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.