Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and NetAlly are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while NetAlly is ranked #7. Auvik holds a 4.9% mindshare in NT, compared to NetAlly’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetAlly users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 221 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

20,095 Views
2,210 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Read 23 NetAlly EtherScope nXG reviews

2,776 Views
2,415 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

NetAlly EtherScope nXG and Auvik are both advanced network management tools, but Auvik generally has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and better long-term ROI.

Features: NetAlly EtherScope nXG: Robust diagnostic capabilities, real-time analysis, on-site troubleshooting. Auvik: Network monitoring, automation, automated network mapping, configuration backups.

Room for Improvement: NetAlly EtherScope nXG: More intuitive interface, enhanced integration with IT systems, broader network management. Auvik: Improved reporting functionalities, scalability for larger networks, specific operational enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetAlly EtherScope nXG: Straightforward deployment, prompt customer service, detailed documentation. Auvik: Ease of deployment, cloud-based setup, complex initial configuration, strong customer service, quicker on-site issue resolution for NetAlly.

Pricing and ROI: NetAlly EtherScope nXG: Higher upfront cost, justified by immediate troubleshooting benefits. Auvik: Subscription-based model, cost-effective, better long-term ROI due to extensive features and lower ongoing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

221

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (2nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 4.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetAlly EtherScope nXG is 5.7%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	4.9%
NetAlly EtherScope nXG	5.7%
Other	89.4%

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

reviewer2349501

Manager, Technical Services at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Real-time network visibility has transformed how we pinpoint LAN bottlenecks and resolve issues faster

The only area for improvement is pricing. Otherwise, the tool is great. I think the pricing is acceptable. If you are working with resellers, it makes it a little bit difficult sometimes for the reseller to be able to make too much, as the margin is not all that significant. However, we are not getting rid of Auvik Network Management (ANM). That is the only thing in my opinion that Auvik Network Management (ANM) can do a little bit better on—maybe just the pricing—but it is a great tool. We are not replacing it with anything and we are not removing it at all. It is a great tool, and we are able to monitor our own internal network as well as that of our customers. In most cases, we have not had any complaints about neither from my techs or from myself about its functionality, as it works really.

Read full review

Bert Aerts

CEO at COMCERT BV

We gain valuable time by not having to use a laptop to do testing, especially with complex connection profiles

The small screen is a little bit of a handicap. It would be nice if we could, for instance, connect a larger screen to the device, but it's very user-friendly. You're only limited by the size of the screen. That's the only negative aspect of doing surveys with this device. Also, in the first releases, I wasn't very happy about the WiFi function, but I have to say that they listened very well because, in the latest release, all my concerns were resolved. It is an Android device, so it is a little bit of dropdown, left-swipe, right-swipe, and that's not always very clear. Sometimes it's not very clear which screen you're looking at. Am I looking at a device configuration? Am I looking at the test configuration? But I think that comes from the Android operating system more than the EtherScope application itself. In general, I'm pretty happy with the device. It's a light device, a portable device. It doesn't heat up. Some small devices sometimes heat up and it's not really fun to work with them. I don't see a lot of negative points. It evolved, of course. It has been on the market now for several years and I think it is a very mature product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The time-to-value, for me, was almost immediate; once we started implementation, I was able to start seeing stuff even on day one, and by the time we had it fully implemented, I was already seeing value out of it."

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) has helped decrease our mean time to resolution by 60%."

"There are times when we inherit issues from whatever company we acquire, and deploying Auvik Network Management on a site and having it map everything that it can find and pull down all of the configuration is absolutely amazing for network discovery."

"My team has a lot of different needs and they will use it for monitoring server performance issues and the like. But the most important functionality for me, over the years, has been port mapping when I'm trying to figure out where a network has stopped responding."

"What I find most valuable about Auvik Network Management is the statistics it provides over the months, which are valuable to consumers. I use reporting every month for reporting to the institutions, so for me, that's the most beneficial."

"This has really changed our network operations."

"Auvik Network Management reduced the downtime and sped up the recovery."

"Auvik stands out for its user-friendly interface and its comprehensive configuration management features."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"One of the standout features is its ability to serve as an advanced handheld packet analyzer. It excels in discovering both wired and wireless networks and automatically documenting them, which is really valuable. The tool provides insights from the physical layer up to layer seven, including HTTP, which helps diagnose network issues effectively. This automated documentation feature sets NetAlly apart from competitors, enhancing efficiency and accuracy in network management and recommendations. When the EtherScope nXG identifies a problem, it alerts us, allowing us to use more advanced tools for deeper analysis. Regarding PoE testing capabilities, I haven't explored them extensively, but I'm aware of their importance, especially for detecting issues like overloading switches with too many PoE devices. Integrators are becoming more cautious about these issues, but specialized tools like those from other vendors may offer features like microburst dashboards, which EtherScope nXG currently doesn't provide."

"The price is very low given the amount of time I've saved."

"Overall, the nXG has helped us to be more effective when it comes to troubleshooting."

"This could save a lot of headaches on troubleshooting networks, connections, and cables."

"In terms of the return on investment, when you use it onsite once or twice, it has already paid for itself."

"When it comes to that remote troubleshooting perspective of being able to survey an area to see if there are problems, make adjustments, and then have that same individual resurvey that same area, I don't have to send people to a week long class on how to use the device. I know I am getting consistent results, which can verify near real-time, and whether or not the changes that I have implemented solve the problem."

"The most valuable part is absolutely being able to assess existing WiFi networks quickly. You get very powerful details of networks, details that you couldn't see unless you had multiple pieces of software and hardware. This does it all in one thing."

"It has reduced our internal troubleshooting time. In the cases where we could not internally solve the troubleshooting, we would have had to contact an external vendor to test cable, rerun it, etc. NetAlly EtherScope has let us eliminate that in most cases so we can resolve an issue on our own without having to call a third-party out to identify the problem. It has reduced our troubleshooting time for network cabling issues by a good 75 percent."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pros

Cons

"The biggest area for improvement is the speed of the website because it's not something we host. Each of our clients hosts an agent that gathers the logs and pushes it up. The website can be slow to click around in or click through."

"I want to see improvement around backups; we had a case where we created a ticket for online support, and they were able to set up backups for one of our devices, but they were unwilling to do the same backup script with a different device. The script uses the same code, just a different model number, and the engineers weren't willing to add it to the other model."

"The general feature set could use some work. For network mapping and network alerting, it's great for what it does. But it could provide more monitoring, such as jitter monitoring, which it doesn't have, and round-trip time for packets. I would like to see more network detail on the actual traffic that's flowing through the network."

"I'd like to be able to deep dive more into the reporting. The reporting is still being scaled and built out and I would love to see some additional products being added to the stack. For example, Auvik covers certain types of firewalls, but I would like to see more enterprise stuff added to the stack."

"I'd like to see some enhancements to Auvik's network map, including the ability to focus on specific areas without viewing the entire map."

"The network map and dashboard can be difficult at times because they do not scale very well. You have to either view the map itself or the dashboard itself."

"When we configured our network, there were some mismatches between the automatically-detected network topology and the actual topology. Some of the devices were not detected or were not supported by Auvik. We were able to manually modify things and everything has worked well since then."

"However, its pricing was a little bit higher."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The reporting could be better, with more accurate measurements of loss over cables, impedance, etc. The mapping also needs to be improved. You should be able to do free formatting of the topology."

"We have had to use a battery pack unit, bringing it with us, when we are doing long testing or a lot of testing. It is like a mini computer, so it does use a lot of battery life."

"On a hardware spec, it'd be nice to have something above 10-Gigs."

"When it works, I love the AirMapper Site Survey app. Currently, my device has a hardware bug that the manufacturer and I are working on actively, to get it fixed or replaced. The 5 gigahertz radio on my device is flaky at best... It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the product itself, as much as it is some kind of unique hardware problem."

"The only improvement I can come up with is the battery life. If they could improve the battery life, that would be great."

"The battery life is a little bit too short."

"If I could reset it remotely, meaning reboot the unit, that would be helpful."

"The battery life could be better. There have been a couple of times that I used it and put it down, then I went to pick it up and the battery was dead. So, I need to take the power cord with me in order to continue using it."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the way that it's deployed, where the pricing only affects certain devices—meaning there are some free devices, so that you don't pay for everything—it's quite nicely priced in the middle. It's not an overpriced product, but it's also not a very cheap product."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable for what we get. It's billed by certain, core network devices that it monitors, but I'm not billed for all the devices it monitors. For example, wireless access points and small things like that, throughout the network, are not billed."

"The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device."

"Auvik is a cost-efficient solution for the applications we use it for."

"The pricing is fair; it's just the right price for what the solution provides."

"Relative to others, it is affordable. It is not terrible. The Performance licensing is a little expensive for what you get, but the standard licensing is fine."

"While Auvik's pricing was attractive, we ultimately had to make budget cuts."

"I believe we have a special arrangement with them because we, as an MSP, take care of some of their technical services."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"It is worth it. The cost benefit of Link-Live is massive because it is included with the cost of the device and the licensing. A lot of people miss that part of it. It is not just the device that you get but it is the ability to look at all of that data later on. You're not having to do all of that on the device. You can just be there, use the device, and then look at the data from the comfort of your office or home afterward."

"It is relatively high-priced and it should certainly not get any more expensive. I would like it to be $1,000 less, and I think everyone would say that. And of course, maintenance is also a recurring cost."

"For the average network shop, the cost is a bit high. In a lot of organizations, people don't share test devices between teams. Generally, you need a device for the network team and a device for the system team, the security team, etc. While the cost is a little on the high side, that is offset by the regular updates and continued improvements that NetAlly adds to the device. Those improvements continue to increase the perceived value of the device."

"We paid for the additional maintenance on it (for an extra year) to get that extra coverage. This was the first time that we had this solution in-house, and it was pretty pricey. So, we wanted to make sure that anything went wrong, then we could get it repaired."

"In terms of pricing, EtherScope isn't cheap. It's a significant investment, and not a budget option."

"Depending on the company, it could be somewhat costly. But just two of these devices can save you thousands upon thousands of dollars."

"If you're in the networking world, this product makes great sense very quickly, if you're going to use it more than a few times a week... If you are just looking at a handheld device unit for specific, wireless or wired testing and not much else, the cost may be a little more prohibitive than what you have in your budget."

"It's the best 10Gig network tester for the price on the market."

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	160
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

The reason I give it an eight, rather than a nine or ten, relates to the premium price of Auvik Network Management (ANM). If the price were lower, my expectations would not be so high, and I would ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Regarding the features of Auvik Network Management (ANM), I believe that the primary improvement needed focuses on ensuring the live topology map is as accurate and easy to understand as possible, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to have full visibility, so when I have Auvik Network Management (ANM) deployed with my customer, especially the full license, which includes ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

AirCheck G3 vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 28% of the time

Wireshark vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 15% of the time

LinkRunner vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 12% of the time

AirMagnet Survey PRO vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Compared 2% of the time

More NetAlly EtherScope nXG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

NetAlly EtherScope nXG

October 2026

Download NetAlly EtherScope nXG product report

Also Known As

No data available

EtherScope nXG, EtherScope, netAlly EtherScope, OptiView XG

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

NetAlly EtherScope nXG is a comprehensive network analysis tool designed for network troubleshooting, validation, and performance testing. Its robust features facilitate efficient network assessments, making it indispensable for tasks like WiFi and wired network diagnostics and connectivity confirmation.

NetAlly EtherScope nXG stands out with its multi-technology functionality that includes a 10 Gb capability and support for Wi-Fi troubleshooting. The inclusion of the AirMapper Site Survey app enhances its usability by providing detailed heatmaps for network assessments. Its pre-programmed AutoTest offers ease of use for both novices and experts. Featuring a compact design, its portability allows for efficient and quick onsite network evaluation. This all-in-one tool is suitable for diagnosing network issues, viewing channel usage, and conducting cable testing, thereby supporting daily network operations.

What are the key features of NetAlly EtherScope nXG?

Remote Login: Enables access and management from afar, allowing for comprehensive network problem-solving.
Multi-technology Functionality: Features 10 Gb capability for versatile network analysis.
AirMapper Site Survey: Provides heatmaps that assist in visualizing network performance and coverage.
Pre-programmed AutoTest: Simplifies complex testing with just one push, aiding both beginners and seasoned professionals.
Wi-Fi Troubleshooting: Offers in-depth diagnostic tools for efficient Wi-Fi assessment.

What benefits should users expect?

Efficiency: Streamlines network assessment processes, saving time and resources.
Comprehensive Diagnostics: Delivers detailed insights necessary for informed network maintenance and planning.
Portability: A compact form factor that facilitates easy transport and deployment.
Versatility: Accommodates diverse testing needs with advanced handheld capabilities.
User-friendly: Designed for easy use across skill levels, enhancing operational productivity.

In industries such as telecommunications and IT, NetAlly EtherScope nXG is implemented as a primary tool for network performance testing, validation, and troubleshooting. Organizations deploy it to ensure seamless connectivity and efficient network operation, addressing challenges through features designed for comprehensive analysis and rapid network assessments.

NetAlly

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetAlly EtherScope nXG report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.