

ScienceLogic and Auvik Network Management compete in the IT management and network monitoring sector. Based on the data, while ScienceLogic offers extensive flexibility and customization, Auvik provides a user-friendly experience with significant ease of use and remote access capabilities.
Features: ScienceLogic is valued for its flexibility, extensive customization, and integration with various systems. Its granular monitoring capabilities and built-in automation are significant strengths. On the other hand, Auvik is known for its intuitive interface, robust network discovery, and real-time visibility, making network management simple and effective.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users have noted the complexity of customization, a steeper learning curve, and reporting difficulties. Enhancements in integration and automation simplicity are potential areas for improvement. For Auvik, users suggest enhancements in scalability and more detailed reporting options. Additionally, improvements in network map customization and third-party tool integration are desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is recognized for its solid customer support and technical expertise, although its deployment can be complex, reflecting its enterprise focus. Auvik's cloud-based nature provides straightforward deployment and easy integration, with customer service noted for responsiveness despite some longer wait times for support.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a flexible pricing model suited for large enterprises, often seen as expensive but justified by its robust capabilities. Users report a positive ROI over time due to reduced incident rates. Auvik uses a device-based pricing structure which is reasonable for its features but can be costly for larger networks. The ease of use and network visibility contribute positively to its ROI by enhancing operational efficiency.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) has saved us time by being able to go to that single pane of glass and identify things collectively versus bouncing back and forth between different web portals.
Auvik Network Management has definitely helped reduce business disruptions related to network issues.
Auvik Network Management saves me 40% to 50% of our time.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
I would give Auvik Network Management support a ten out of ten.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
We keep adding sites into Auvik Network Management, and it doesn't seem to affect performance or anything on our end.
I would rate the stability of Auvik Network Management (ANM) a perfect 10 because I have never found any problems.
A lot of platforms, especially when it comes to CRMs, CMSs, and ERPs, are still built on PHP and MySQL, which I feel is archaic now and slow to query.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Enhancements in API functionality and wider tool support for integration with PSA or RMM tools.
Auvik does a good job of nesting those devices. For example, a bunch of different servers will all be nested in one icon on the map, and when opened up, all those multiple servers can be seen.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
The pricing for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is great; it is comparable to other solutions, and for what it does, it actually provides more value for the money than some of the other major competitors.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing or licensing is about 2,500 per year for approximately 4,000 endpoints, which is quite reasonable.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Its proactive monitoring and simplified troubleshooting have significantly impacted our efficiency in handling network management tasks.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Auvik Network Management (ANM) | 1.3% |
| ScienceLogic | 1.8% |
| Other | 96.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 146 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.
Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.
What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.