Avada Software Infrared360 vs Dynatrace comparison

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 359 Dynatrace reviews

41,435 Views
27,761 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and Avada Software Infrared360 are key players in the software monitoring and management industry. User reviews indicate that Dynatrace has an edge in broader feature offerings, while Avada Software Infrared360 excels in IBM middleware management and ease of deployment.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace is noted for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, automated problem detection, and root cause analysis. It includes application performance management, AI-driven insights, and full-stack observability. Avada Software Infrared360 shines with its powerful IBM middleware management, simplified integration, and centralized control of middleware environments.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace users suggest improvements in its complexity, lengthy setup time, and steep learning curve. In contrast, Avada Software Infrared360 could enhance its documentation, user training resources, and the breadth of its integration capabilities.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace deployment is complex, with some users needing significant support. Avada Software Infrared360 offers a more straightforward deployment process but has reported issues with customer service responsiveness. Both products can benefit from improved support services.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost but provides a strong ROI over time. Avada Software Infrared360 is cost-efficient with a quicker return on investment, making it more budget-friendly while Dynatrace justifies its higher cost with long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace Report (Updated: September 2026).

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avada Software Infrared360

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

71st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (34th)

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

359

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (6th), Mobile APM (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (2nd), AI Observability (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avada Software Infrared360 is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dynatrace is 4.8%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dynatrace	4.8%
Avada Software Infrared360	0.6%
Other	94.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

AI-driven insights have reduced downtime and improved cross-team collaboration

We encountered some challenges while using Dynatrace. Although the initial setup was smooth, fine-tuning alert thresholds and custom metrics took some time. Another challenge was that Dynatrace charges based on host units, so we had to carefully plan our agent deployments. The licensing model is expensive. Additionally, the complexity of setup is an issue. While OneAgent and auto-discover services are powerful, the setup is more complex compared to other tools such as Prometheus and Grafana. These integrations are simple and basic, but Dynatrace setup requires more complexity based on the environment. For new users wanting to use Dynatrace, it is difficult. However, the AI-related solutions and metrics took us to the next level for identifying and fixing things. Dynatrace requires an agent for operation. OneAgent is powerful, but it is also resource-heavy. On lightweight nodes or older systems, the agent can slightly impact performance. If Dynatrace could implement a lightweight agent behavior, we could make things faster. Additionally, if Dynatrace could add a long-term retention policy so that we could store more data and find fine-grained details, that would help us. While Dynatrace managed edition supports on-premises deployment, the SaaS version depends on cloud connectivity. For highly regulated or air-gapped environments, setup and updates can be challenging. Although the initial setup is smooth, if someone wants to fine-tune it and fully understand the tool end-to-end, it could be tricky.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."

"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"

"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."

"I highly recommend Infrared360 for an all-in-one IBM MQ tool."

"The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes."

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution."

"One way it's helped the business is how you're able to empower MQ users, without your administrators, to be able to do different types of processes in the environment."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

"The dashboard is the most useful aspect of the solution."

"We used to work on two kinds of projects: banking and insurance; the second had a lot of performance issues, then came Dynatrace which has solved the problems, and our clients felt the difference."

"The graphical interface is helpful, as it illustrates things well for anyone who wants to know about the information it provides."

"Besides being an Application Performance management platform, Dynatrace has many important features that are easy to use, which gives us more time to focus on business."

"The linking is very good in Dynatrace. What happens in other monitoring tools is the linking is not proper. In those solutions, a person has to manually link many of the layers and what is happening in them, while in Dynatrace you get that from the very first visit. For example, if a person is visiting your website, from there it will traverse you to the end. If the application is a Java application, it will traverse you there, to the Method level. So that linking and traversing is better in Dynatrace."

"I am able to customize my dashboard based on the test requirement and it helps me to focus on the area that really needs close monitoring."

"Support from Dynatrace is excellent. They are always on hand for any queries, demos, and/or issues."

"Before we had the tool we had no visibility into the user experience and capturing what was going on inside the browser. We utilized tags so we knew how many times people were doing certain things, but we did not know how the performance was, if users were satisfied with what they were doing, and if we were serving up errors."

More Dynatrace pros

Cons

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"RFAs submitted via the forum need to be answered or resolved quickly."

"I would like to see income monitoring for the servers and infrastructure monitoring."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools."

"Beginner video tutorials would really help."

"The licensing part is complicated or not transparent."

"The one thing people really liked that we can do in AppMon is executive dashboards and, until recently, you couldn't even create the business transactions you need for the data at the back-end of those dashboards. But if I had to ask for one thing it would be: In the new platform, give me the ability to do dashboarding in the way it's done in AppMon, and I think that would bridge a lot of the missing pieces. If I could do the same type of executive dashboards on the walls, they would be happy."

"Even with PurePath and the like, it still takes time, a day or whatever - or expert knowledge of some person - to be able to identify a problem quickly."

More Dynatrace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"There are additional Professional Services costs which ensure the solution is configured with meaningful names so you're getting the most money for your investment."

"There is time savings. People's times have been cut in half using this solution because we were previously doing a lot of that manual work. Now, it's a lot more automated, and the data is just there."

"Setup cost is very low considering that it is an almost totally, automatic process."

"Surprisingly, it is quite expensive. That is something that we could always see: Improved pricing and the overall construct on how do we use each license in regards to usage of the tool."

"There is a license cost, which is obviously more expensive than an open-source solution, but for the return on investment from what you get from it, it's a great investment. Of course, it could always be cheaper."

"I feel the price is good for what the product does."

"Our annual costs were about the same for both AppDynamics and Dynatrace."

"It's more expensive than other solutions, but worth it. We use full APM monitoring on our primary systems, but only resource monitoring on lesser systems. We shift licenses around our environment when a deeper dive into lesser systems is required."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	299

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 12% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 7% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 4% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

Avantra vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Product Reports

Avada Software Infrared360

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Download Dynatrace product report

Also Known As

Infrared360

No data available

Overview

Avada Software Infrared360 is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed for businesses to effectively manage their enterprise middleware environments, providing robust support for operational processes.

Avada Software Infrared360 acts as a powerful middleware management tool, offering real-time monitoring and detailed insights into system operations. Designed for seamless integration, it ensures users can troubleshoot and optimize their infrastructure efficiently. With its flexible architecture, users gain centralized control over their middleware systems, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining operational continuity.

What features make Avada Software Infrared360 valuable?

Real-Time Monitoring: Enables live tracking of middleware environments to quickly identify issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform to oversee all deployments, reducing complexity.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization for enhanced visibility tailored to user needs.
Historical Analytics: Provides data analysis over time to improve system performance and planning.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Avada Software Infrared360?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations through centralized and real-time management.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes system functionality and reduces downtime with immediate issue resolution.
Cost Reduction: Decreases expenses related to managing middleware systems by improving resource allocation.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding middleware requirements without significant re-investment.

Avada Software Infrared360 is particularly effective in industries where large-scale middleware management is crucial, such as finance and telecommunications. These sectors benefit from its robust monitoring capabilities and real-time insights, enabling them to maintain high levels of service and operational efficiency.

Avada Software

Dynatrace is advancing observability for today’s digital businesses, helping to transform the complexity of modern digital ecosystems into powerful business assets. By leveraging AI-powered insights, Dynatrace enables organizations to analyze, automate, and innovate faster to drive their business forward. To learn more about how Dynatrace can help your business, visit www.dynatrace.com, visit our blog and follow us on LinkedIn and X @dynatrace.

Sample Customers

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

TD Bank, Zurich North America, Accenture, Macquarie, United Airlines, Raymond James, BT, Vodafone, Air France-KLM, TELUS, American Airlines, Air Canada, ADT, Virgin Money

Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Dynatrace