Avantra vs Azure Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Avantra and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Avantra is ranked #52, while Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.6. Avantra holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avantra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Avantra

Read 5 Avantra reviews

5,892 Views
3,594 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

Read 56 Azure Monitor reviews

11,929 Views
10,259 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Avantra

Azure Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Avantra and Azure Monitor are two monitoring solutions competing in the monitoring and automation category. Azure Monitor has the upper hand with its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: Avantra is notable for its comprehensive monitoring, automation capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Azure Monitor is valued for its integration with Azure services, scalability, and extensive advanced features.

Room For Improvement: Avantra could improve its UI/UX, provide better documentation, and enhance scalability. Azure Monitor needs better alerting mechanisms, more simplified configuration options, and improved usability enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avantra is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Azure Monitor users report more deployment challenges but appreciate Microsoft's extensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Avantra is known for its cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI. Azure Monitor, while perceived as more expensive, justifies its higher cost with powerful features and comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Avantra vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Azure Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avantra

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

52nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (12th), Server Monitoring (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (52nd)

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avantra is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 1.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Monitor	1.9%
Avantra	1.3%
Other	96.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mani Velayudhan

Manager, SAP Basis at The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Useful automation capabilities, scales well, and simple implementation

We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities. Looking ahead to future releases, I would like to see more advanced automation features. As a long-term goal, I am considering the possibility of automating SAP system upgrades. While this would not be an easy feat, advancements in technology may make it feasible in the future. Overall, a key feature I hope to see in future releases is increased automation capabilities.

Read full review

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily

I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."

"You can customize alerts based on need."

"Deployment was amazingly short and simple; I do not think I have seen any SAP-related product installs ready to work so fast, and out-of-box it included most of the functions and settings that we needed."

"It's just very user-friendly, and it's very easy to monitor the servers using Avantra."

"It's very easy to manage and use."

"I definitely recommend this solution, it provides good value for money."

"It prevented two major failures in our SAP production systems."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."

"We get good results from Microsoft Azure, so that's why we stick with Microsoft Azure."

"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."

"Azure Monitor has helped our organization to have insights into issues and informs us before an issue becomes a very critical stage."

"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."

"The solution has tons of valuable features."

"The detailed logging is great."

"You can scale the product."

More Azure Monitor pros

Cons

"The dashboard needs to improve."

"I think they can improve their UI, while very intuitive, I would like to see graphic updates."

"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."

"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."

"The dashboard needs to improve; it's not so clear right now and we need it to be more usable so we can have all of our reports in one easy-to-access place."

"A downside of Avantra is that it comes with predefined values."

"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."

"Azure Monitor could improve by adding capabilities for data observability and integrating more tightly with their data platform components."

"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."

"No improvements are needed from my perspective."

"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."

"In terms of pricing, Azure Monitor's billing based on data size can sometimes lead to increased costs, especially when developers need to purge data frequently. While there are mechanisms in place to track and manage this, there is room for improvement in terms of optimizing data pausing and related processes. Enhancements in this area could help mitigate potential billing concerns and provide a more seamless experience for users."

"The product is not as good as a lot of market-leading products; I wouldn't recommend the solution at all and would direct other companies to go to either ExtraHop, New Relic, or Dynatrace instead."

"Using Azure Monitor and Azure Arc separately to monitor different environments can be complicated."

More Azure Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a pay-as-you-go model. I find it very cost-effective."

"Azure Monitor's price is minimal to the point of being almost negligible."

"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."

"Azure Monitor is cheaper compared to other third-party monitoring tools."

"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."

"My company is okay with the current pricing of the solution."

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

20%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Monitor?

I am a developer who uses Azure Monitor for telemetry of the applications that I work on. Application Insights is one of those tools, and I have also used other non-Azure products before. Currently...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Avantra

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs Avantra

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Avantra

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Avantra

Compared 6% of the time

More Avantra Competitors

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avantra

September 2026

Download Avantra product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

September 2026

Download Azure Monitor product report

Overview

Avantra is an industry-leading platform designed to automate SAP operations for enterprises. It optimizes SAP landscapes, ensuring efficient performance management to meet the demands of large-scale environments while reducing manual tasks.

Avantra automates SAP operations, providing tools that enhance efficiency and reliability. It assists enterprises with advanced monitoring, performance optimization, and predictive analytics, crucial for managing complex SAP landscapes. By integrating seamlessly with SAP environments, it offers comprehensive insights and automations that lead to improved operational control and reduced manual intervention. Businesses benefit significantly by bridging IT operations with business objectives, thereby facilitating more effective resource allocation and decision-making processes.

What are the key features of Avantra?

Automated Health Checks: Conducts daily system analysis for consistent performance tracking.
Predictive Monitoring: Uses AI for early detection of potential SAP issues to prevent downtime.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers a clear view of system performance with customizable metrics.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly fits into existing workflows with robust integrations.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the workload on IT teams, freeing up resources.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and resource wastage, leading to cost savings.
Improved Decision Making: Real-time data insights enable better strategic planning.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts system stability and enhances user satisfaction.

Avantra is particularly beneficial in industries with heavy reliance on SAP systems, such as manufacturing and finance. It helps streamline operations, providing rapid responsiveness to market changes and regulatory requirements, ensuring that businesses remain competitive and compliant in their respective fields.

Avantra

Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.

Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.

What key features does Azure Monitor offer?

Integration with Visual Studio: Enhances debugging and monitoring for developers.
Dynamic Alerting: Provides real-time notifications for critical conditions.
Telemetry Capabilities: Advanced data collection to analyze and optimize application performance.
Logging and Metrics Gathering: Offers detailed insights for better resource management.
Custom Queries and Log Analytics: Facilitates in-depth data exploration and analysis.

What benefits do users experience with Azure Monitor?

Ease of Integration: Streamlines operations across Azure and third-party services.
Scalability: Adapts to growing monitoring needs efficiently.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances cost with enhanced performance visibility.
Reporting Features: Provides comprehensive reports to improve operational efficiency.
Multi-Cloud Support: Extends monitoring capabilities across different cloud environments.

Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Migros, Strauss, Migros, LAM research, Deloitte, Deloitte, Kiewit

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Azure Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: Avantra vs. Azure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Avantra vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avantra vs. Azure Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.