Aviatrix vs Cisco ACI comparison

Aviatrix and Cisco are both solutions in the Software Defined Networking (SDN) category. Aviatrix is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Cisco is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Aviatrix holds a 4.6% mindshare in SDN, compared to Cisco’s 15.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Aviatrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Aviatrix

Read 6 Aviatrix reviews

336 Views
172 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Cisco ACI

Read 101 Cisco ACI reviews

1,605 Views
444 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Aviatrix

Cisco ACI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Cisco ACI and Aviatrix are competing in the network management domain. Aviatrix has the upper hand with superior cloud integration capabilities, while Cisco ACI excels in on-premises management, making it favorable for traditional data centers.

Features:Cisco ACI is known for its end-to-end visibility, streamlined workflow automation, and robust data center management. Aviatrix stands out with its dynamic routing, global transit architecture, and advanced security controls for cloud environments.

Room for Improvement:Cisco ACI could improve its integration and adaptability to modern cloud environments. It can be challenging to deploy in large systems. Aviatrix could enhance its user interface for better usability and work on increasing compatibility with more enterprise-level on-premises systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Cisco ACI offers a complex deployment model suited for large enterprises, supported by comprehensive customer service. Aviatrix features a flexible model optimized for rapid cloud integration and provides agile customer support for cloud-native needs.

Pricing and ROI:Cisco ACI involves higher upfront costs due to hardware dependencies but offers ROI through comprehensive data center management. Aviatrix provides a cost-effective solution with cloud usage-based pricing, delivering financial benefits in cloud-centric use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aviatrix

Ranking in Software Defined Networking (SDN)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco ACI

Ranking in Software Defined Networking (SDN)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

Network Virtualization (1st), Cloud and Data Center Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Software Defined Networking (SDN) category, the mindshare of Aviatrix is 4.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco ACI is 15.2%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

Featured Reviews

Govinda Mengji

Specialist Master | Manager at Deloitte

Has multiple capabilities which are not present in other products in the market

This tool resolves the overlapping of CIDR’s IP addresses in a multi-cloud environment, which is its best feature. The product also gives packet-level details on the data that has been put from one cloud to another. Currently, no other solution in the market can give this kind of detail. There is also the high VPN connectivity which gives high throughput. Internet service providers have a limitation on large migrations like 10 Gigabytes or 2 to 2.3 GBPS. However, this tool gives you a functionality where you can bundle multiple tunnels into one tunnel. Thereafter, you can transfer the data from one environment to another or from on-prem to the cloud.

Read full review

Raj Metkar

Director, Head of Networks at MUFG, EMEA

Provides scalability, ease of migration for future DC moves, multi-tenancy and programmability

Cisco's MSO (Multi-Site Orchestrator) or NDO has room for improvement. Cisco monitors ACI through a product called NDI. I find it very frustrating that Cisco has multiple monitoring platforms. It has DNAC for monitoring Cisco NX-OS, campus switches, and any other routers and switches you would have in the environment. That same thing does not work for Cisco ACI monitoring. MEraki cloudbasd platform for Meraki which will get extended to Campus monitoring, to be honest Cisco never got Monitoring 100% right from days of CiscoWorks to Prime to current platforms. To monitor and manage Cisco ACI, you need to have another platform called NDI and Cisco Dashboard Insights. What frustrates me about Cisco is that it never has a central, single pane of glass platform for all its solutions. It has one thing for Cisco ACI and another thing for campus switches. I would really appreciate it if Cisco came up with something centralized to monitor everything. I haven't thought about anything since the Cisco NDO is quite advanced, and you can deploy your cloud networking through it. I don't know how many people use it. I might explore it as my cloud orchestration tool in the future. We do a lot of cloud automation using our scripts like TerraForm, but I would like to see people using NDO more. We could have more case studies on how many people use NDO for their cloud orchestration. That might be a much easier journey for people when they move from an on-premises data center into a cloud and move from one cloud to another cloud. That is where I personally see an orchestrator being effectively used for multiple deployments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its exceptional capability to seamlessly integrate with various cloud services makes it the preferred choice for multi-cloud deployments."

"The most valuable feature of Aviatrix is that it saves us a lot of time."

"This tool resolves the overlapping of CIDR’s IP addresses in a multi-cloud environment, which is its best feature. The product also gives packet-level details on the data that has been put from one cloud to another. Currently, no other solution in the market can give this kind of detail. There is also the high VPN connectivity which gives high throughput. Internet service providers have a limitation on large migrations like 10 Gigabytes or 2 to 2.3 GBPS. However, this tool gives you a functionality where you can bundle multiple tunnels into one tunnel. Thereafter, you can transfer the data from one environment to another or from on-prem to the cloud."

"Within the Aviatrix ecosystem, you could connect different clouds, and the intricacies of low-level commands and configurations were abstracted away."

"The connections are seamless, and we can access the static clouds on the platform itself. We are also able to trace the issues. The most valuable features of the solution are security, user interface, and performance."

"The product has greatly improved our organization by saving costs for multiple direct connections and simpler cloud configurations."

"There are many features which are useful, like the automatic completion of the VXLAN."

"The ability to integrate with other systems is the most valuable feature."

"It's improved the static configuration of our data center switching environment. But it's added some challenges to our ability to operationalize it and make it easier for people to manage."

"In a very general way, the ease of access, ease of use, and ease of connecting the system is a valuable feature in itself. The solution doesn't really increase detection rates as that is not what it was created for. Threat prevention comes in from other devices that might be connected into the Cisco ACI that monitors external traffic. It maintains what end-of-life products would be doing and offers other opportunities to unify solutions."

"PBR has been beneficial for network efficiency."

"It improves security and automation."

"Virtualization and integration with VMware is the most valuable feature."

"The scalability is great. This is the greatest feature of the technology. It is a great improvement in scaling out. It can greatly increase the overall scalability of the Fabric with multi-port and multi side, making it a great product."

More Cisco ACI pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement regarding enhancing its security features in response to modern cybersecurity challenges."

"The tool has a very limited local presence in the GCC market. I am based in Dubai, UAE and it would be very difficult for me to reach out to US staff for technical discussion during the tool’s implementation. The tool needs to focus on the GCC market which includes UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, etc. There is nobody to help you out in this region."

"Aviatrix should include more integrated security features like intrusion detection and lateral movement detection."

"There could be an easy availability of multiple features in the profile."

"The solution needs to improve the onboarding architecture."

"There can be a steep learning curve for users who are not familiar with it or multi-cloud networking concepts"

"We're still in the process of doing the migration. We haven't migrated completely all of our applications out of our legacy into it yet. It was challenging at first, but getting easier now that we're starting to get into it."

"It would be better to introduce some wizards to guide you through the whole configuration process instead of clicking through a bunch of menus with no concrete path. It is too easy to forget one or another if you configure it this way."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to see some sort of way to baseline the system in a network-centric fashion."

"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of ACI's integration with various technologies."

"It is more about resolving bugs early on in the code. Otherwise, as the product gets more mature and those bugs get discovered sometimes by the customer, then Cisco will resolve them."

"The firewall has room for improvement because there is no central inspection yet on Cisco ACI."

"The error messages should be improved. Sometimes we want to remove an error message so we acknowledge an error and we would then like to remove it but there's no real way of doing that. If we need to do it, we need to open a tech case. That could use improvement."

"I would like to be able to test the upgrades in a simulation before implementing them in production because not everyone has a lab."

More Cisco ACI cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It operates on a consumption-based model and the expenses depend on factors such as the number of virtual machines you use and the resources consumed."

"Aviatrix is a pretty expensive solution."

"During the initial phase, it operates as an open-source and it's a free tool."

"It saves time and resources."

"We used Cisco Professional Services for the deployment. They were outstanding, but very expensive."

"The cost is fine."

"Once you sign for the start kit implementation, you have to go all the way through to the implementation, even if you are experiences issues."

"Cisco ACI is more expensive than Juniper, however, ACI is not the most expensive option."

"We don't use all of the features but it's still worth the money."

"Price is always an issue."

"Pricing for Cisco ACI could be expensive if you're not a gold partner. If you're a gold partner, you'll get reasonable pricing, but to become a gold partner, you must cross several layers. For example, at least twenty engineers within your organization have to be certified, with each certification priced at £2,000 minimum, so this would make some companies think twice about the product. If you're going for Aruba and Juniper products, on the other hand, you can quickly get the partner status, and you can start selling the product. As a gold partner, you can get up to seventy percent discount on Cisco ACI, for example, while an ordinary partner gets ten percent off. Cisco ACI is expensive for both customers and partners, but I'm rating pricing for the product as four out of five because even if the price is costly, you get a lot of benefits from the product. Cisco ACI isn't the best, price-wise, but it's still a good solution. If you're in a small organization, you may be unable to afford it. Cisco ACI is best for enterprises but not SMBs because Cisco ACI and its required resources are expensive."

More Cisco ACI pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aviatrix?

The most valuable feature of Aviatrix is that it saves us a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aviatrix?

Aviatrix is a pretty expensive solution. Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution and the support. You can't buy the product without support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aviatrix?

Aviatrix should include more integrated security features like intrusion detection and lateral movement detection.

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Cisco ACI and VMware NSX?

There are some very major differences between both the Products and to name a few. -Cisco ACI have physical network gear (9K Switches) where the Code runs in ACI Policy Mode & the UCS server wh...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Cisco ACI and VMware NSX?

Once you know your way around the Cisco ecosystem, using Cisco ACI is not so difficult. It is a global product, so when you change one interface, changes are automatically reflected on every switch...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco ACI?

The flexibility of adding new components with minimal impact on existing services running in the data center is a key benefit of this ACI-based solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Aviatrix

Compared 32% of the time

Meraki SD-WAN vs Aviatrix

Compared 23% of the time

VMware NSX vs Aviatrix

Compared 19% of the time

Megaport vs Aviatrix

Compared 11% of the time

More Aviatrix Competitors

Cisco Secure Workload vs Cisco ACI

Compared 24% of the time

VMware NSX vs Cisco ACI

Compared 21% of the time

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Cisco ACI

Compared 17% of the time

HPE SDN vs Cisco ACI

Compared 9% of the time

Nuage Networks vs Cisco ACI

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco ACI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Networking (SDN)

March 2025

Download Aviatrix product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco ACI

March 2025

Download Cisco ACI product report

Overview

The Aviatrix solution consists of two components: the Aviatrix Gateway, which is deployed on-premises or in the cloud; and the Aviatrix Cloud Controller, which orchestrates and manages one or more Gateways.

Aviatrix

Cisco ACI automates data center networking, centralizing management and configuration of diverse network environments. It's used for micro-segmentation, replacing legacy networks, and deploying software-defined networking.

Cisco ACI enables seamless integration with cloud platforms and multi-site connectivity. It ensures high availability and redundancy, supports network-centric applications, enhances security, and facilitates agile service implementations across different regions and data centers. The platform offers high throughput, ease of configuration, centralized management, and programmability. Users find value in its single management interface, policy-based routing, Service Graphs, and simplified deployment. Cisco ACI also excels in scalability, automation, low latency, and supports data center expansion efficiently.

What are the key features of Cisco ACI?

High Throughput: Ensures fast data transmission and network efficiency.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifies setup and changes to network configurations.
Centralized Management: Provides a single interface for managing the entire network.
Micro-Segmentation: Enhances security by isolating network segments.
Integration with VMware: Seamlessly integrates with VMware environments.
Scalability: Easily expands to accommodate growing organizational needs.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual tasks through advanced automation.
Policy-Based Routing: Optimizes network traffic based on set policies.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Cisco ACI?

Seamless integration with cloud platforms and multi-site connectivity.
High availability and redundancy ensuring consistent service uptime.
Enhanced security with micro-segmentation and policy-based control.
Agility in service implementations across regions and data centers.
Efficiency in network management with centralized control.

Organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology implement Cisco ACI to modernize data centers, improve security, and streamline network operations. Its capabilities support expanding infrastructure, integrating with cloud services, and managing complex network architectures with minimal effort.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Hyatt, Robert Half, GREE

Bowling Green State University, du, Qatar University

Buyer's Guide

Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI

February 2025

Free Report: Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI

Find out what your peers are saying about Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aviatrix vs. Cisco ACI report.

See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.