No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Cost Explorer vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Cost Explorer
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Financial Data Analysis Platforms (3rd)
IBM Turbonomic
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (9th), Cloud Analytics (1st), AIOps (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of AWS Cost Explorer is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 5.4%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Turbonomic5.4%
AWS Cost Explorer3.0%
Other91.6%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Improved cost visibility has supported data‑driven savings and faster anomaly investigations
The best features AWS Cost Explorer offers include cost and usage trend analysis, the cost forecasting feature, service-level spending breakdowns, the tags and cost allocation analysis, Savings Plans recommendations, Reserved Instances recommendations, and reservation coverage and utilization reports. I also appreciate being able to filter by account, service, region, tag, and cost category. The features that stand out for my workflow include cost and usage trend analysis, which I probably could not imagine working without because it really helps me follow the evolution of the different costs per account, per month over the entire year to be able to give useful information to management for possible commitment purposes and decision-making. Without this service or feature, it would be difficult. I particularly appreciate how quickly I can move from a high-level cost view to detailed analysis without requiring complex queries or external reporting tools. AWS Cost Explorer has positively impacted my organization by improving our cost visibility, enabling better financial accountability, and supporting data-driven optimization decisions. It also facilitates collaboration between the teams—engineering, finance, procurement, and leadership—by providing a common source of truth for cloud spending. While I cannot disclose confidential figures, AWS Cost Explorer has helped support cloud optimization initiatives that resulted in great annual savings opportunities through Savings Plans, Reserved Instances, and rightsizing initiatives. It has also reduced the time required to investigate our cost anomalies from hours to minutes. When I mention reduced investigation time from hours to minutes, the typical workflow before involved a team being lost, trying to reconcile where these costs have come from, what accounts have been involved, which services, and jumping from one account to another. For example, if leadership were to ask why AWS cost increased by twenty percent compared to the previous month, this investigation could take hours because you would need to review invoices, analyze usage reports, check which services had increased consumption, identify the affected accounts, and then contact engineering teams for context. However, AWS Cost Explorer streamlined this process significantly because it provides immediate visibility into cost trends. I can quickly compare the time periods, filter by service, account, region, tag, and cost category, and identify the primary drivers of the increase within minutes.
reviewer1446966 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution reduced our operational expenditures and is able to identify points before we even noticed them
The management interface seems to be designed for high-resolution screens. Somebody with a smaller-resolution screen might not like the web interface. I run a 4K monitor on it, so everything fits on the screen. With a lower resolution like 1080, you need to scroll a lot. Everything is in smaller windows. It doesn't seem to be designed for smaller screens. When I change the resolution to 1080, I only see half of what I would on my big 4K monitor. It would be annoying to have to scroll to see the flow chart. They have a flow chart that goes top to bottom like a tree. On a lower resolution, it might be nice if that scrolls horizontally because it's long, narrow, and tall. It's only three icons wide, but it's 15 icons tall. I think it would be helpful to have the ability to change that for a smaller screen and customize the widget.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Cost Explorer has positively impacted my organization by improving our cost visibility, enabling better financial accountability, and supporting data-driven optimization decisions."
"AWS Cost Explorer is beneficial because you can access a simple interface where you can get an overview of all the costs you have in the cloud environment."
"I find the forecasting feature particularly valuable as it helps predict future expenses."
"Using the cost estimate to run our workloads in the cloud, we found 25% to 30% savings by staying on-premises versus going to the cloud."
"Immediate ROI was seen due to the reduced IT infrastructure CapEx."
"Technical support is where Turbonomic shines."
"Customer Service: Perfect, with attention to details on every open ticket, and Technical Support: Top notch effort put into each support request."
"Overall, Turbonomic has had a positive effect on our application performance, helping on many different levels, including toward the resolution of problems and even flat out preventing problems from happening in the first place."
"We no longer have to worry about cluster management, even in an environment with multiple hypervisor vendors."
"Rightsizing is valuable. Its recommendations are pretty good."
"The automation and orchestration components are definitely the best part, as you can tell it what it can do and when, and just let it be."
 

Cons

"While there is always room for improvement, any needs for enhancement depend on specific requirements at the time. Currently, I cannot pinpoint any specific improvements needed."
"One disadvantage of AWS Cost Explorer is that you cannot filter too much. You cannot filter data by more than one variable."
"The reason I would not give it a ten is that advanced analytics, forecasting, and reporting often require additional services, as I mentioned earlier, such as the CUR, Athena, Quicksight, or third-party FinOps platforms."
"The "consumer and producer" model Turbonomic is based off of can be a bit difficult to understand in the beginning."
"There are a few things that we did notice. It does kind of seem to run away from itself a little bit. It does seem to have a mind of its own sometimes. It goes out there and just kind of goes crazy. There needs to be something that kind of throttles things back a little bit. I have personally seen where we've been working on things, then pulled servers out of the VMware cluster and found that Turbonomic was still trying to ship resources to and from that node. So, there has to be some kind of throttling or ability for it to not be so buggy in that area. Because we've pulled nodes out of a cluster into maintenance mode, then brought it back up, and it tried to put workloads on that outside of a cluster. There may be something that is available for this, but it seems very kludgy to me."
"They have a long road map when we ask for certain things that will make the product better. It takes time, but that's understandable because there are other things that are higher on the priority list."
"It would be helpful to have the option to display the target(s) by their host name instead of their IP address."
"The planner can be complex to complete."
"We would like to see VMTurbo develop more application-specific modules that give us additional visibility into the end-user experience."
"This is a very powerful tool that we don't use to its fullest, mostly due to the GUI."
"Licensing for clusters with few VMs (i.e. HA focus over consolidation focus)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"IBM Turbonomic is an investment that we believe will deliver positive returns."
"Everybody tells me the pricing is high. But the ROIs are great."
"Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."
"I consider the pricing to be high."
"It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive."
"In the last year, Turbonomic has reduced our cloud costs by $94,000."
"The pricing is in line with the other solutions that we have. It's not a bargain software, nor is it overly expensive."
"We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise57
Large Enterprise147
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Cost Explorer?
When discussing how AWS Cost Explorer can be improved, I would suggest that if they could incorporate more advanced forecasting capabilities, maybe stronger AI-driven optimization recommendations—e...
What is your primary use case for AWS Cost Explorer?
My primary use case for AWS Cost Explorer is cost visibility and optimization, and I use it to understand where cloud spend is occurring, identify spending trends, analyze cost drivers, evaluate co...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Reserved Instance Reporting
Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Cost Explorer vs. IBM Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.