Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Cost Explorer Logo

Top 10 AWS Cost Explorer Alternatives

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
5.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top AWS Cost Explorer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS Cost Explorer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, Azure Cost Management, and CloudCheckr. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

AWS Cost Explorer surpasses its competitors by offering advanced data visualizations and detailed cost reports, enabling businesses to monitor spending trends and optimize resource allocation effectively.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth
4.3 out of 5
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers comprehensive pricing visibility and robust customer support, appealing to those valuing advanced analytics. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer provides detailed reporting features and superior cost analysis, making it a compelling choice for effective optimization despite higher costs.
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers a straightforward setup process, while AWS Cost Explorer is known for its minimal initial cost advantage. The contrast lies in CloudHealth's simplicity versus AWS's cost-focused setup approach.
View comparison
Pricing
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers a straightforward setup process, while AWS Cost Explorer is known for its minimal initial cost advantage. The contrast lies in CloudHealth's simplicity versus AWS's cost-focused setup approach.
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
Azure Cost Management
4.0 out of 5
Azure Cost Management is favored for transparency and cost-effectiveness, offering customizable dashboards. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer is chosen for robust features like advanced forecasting and extensive filtering, appealing to those seeking comprehensive analytical tools and long-term financial insights.
Azure Cost Management offers competitive setup costs, while AWS Cost Explorer may have higher initial expenses, making Azure a more budget-friendly option for quick deployment compared to AWS's potentially larger financial commitment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Cost Management offers competitive setup costs, while AWS Cost Explorer may have higher initial expenses, making Azure a more budget-friendly option for quick deployment compared to AWS's potentially larger financial commitment upfront.
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
CloudCheckr
3.8 out of 5
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
CloudCheckr
3.8 out of 5
CloudCheckr offers robust multi-cloud capabilities, providing detailed billing and usage analytics. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer provides seamless integration and intuitive cost visualizations exclusive to AWS, ideal for those seeking quick, AWS-centric insights. CloudCheckr's higher setup cost delivers diverse cloud management advantages.
CloudCheckr offers a customizable pricing setup, allowing flexibility for users, while AWS Cost Explorer provides a more straightforward, less flexible setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
CloudCheckr offers a customizable pricing setup, allowing flexibility for users, while AWS Cost Explorer provides a more straightforward, less flexible setup option.
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
Pump.co
1 out of 5
AWS Cost Explorer Logo
Pump.co
1 out of 5
AWS Cost Explorer excels in ecosystem integration, appealing to AWS-dependent organizations. In comparison, Pump.co attracts tech buyers seeking advanced data analytics, offering predictive insights. AWS provides cost-effective solutions, while Pump.co entices with superior analytics for businesses prioritizing in-depth data evaluation.
AWS Cost Explorer offers minimal setup costs, while Pump.co incurs slightly higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Cost Explorer offers minimal setup costs, while Pump.co incurs slightly higher initial fees.

Related categories

Cloud Cost Management
Financial Data Analysis Platforms
Cloud Management