AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Broadcom is ranked #15. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.1% mindshare in PSP, compared to Broadcom’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 12 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

1,415 Views
1,415 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews

5,717 Views
5,603 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Pivotal Cloud Foundry and AWS Elastic Beanstalk compete in the cloud platform category. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is perceived as more cost-effective, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry stands out for deployment and scalability.

Features: Pivotal Cloud Foundry is noted for its robust Java support, easy deployment, and strong CI/CD integration. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers easy log access, automatic scaling, and simplified rollbacks, making it suitable for rapid changes.

Room for Improvement: Pivotal Cloud Foundry users suggest simplifying setup, improving integration with Kubernetes, and reducing costs. AWS Elastic Beanstalk can enhance auto-scaling integration, improve documentation, and offer better built-in features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pivotal Cloud Foundry supports hybrid and private cloud deployments, with reported setup complexities and mixed customer service reviews. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers easy setup on public cloud, although technical support experiences vary.

Pricing and ROI: Pivotal Cloud Foundry has high pricing reflecting in licensing fees but provides good ROI through scalable deployment. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is free, with costs based on AWS resource use, and generally viewed as cost-effective, though AWS support charges can increase expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 5.1%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	1.1%
Pivotal Cloud Foundry	5.1%
Other	93.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technology Limited

Quick automation has simplified my app deployments and has let me focus on data engineering

The overall experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk was excellent. The performance made deploying and managing my application very easy, and it was really smooth and efficient. The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly. I have given a rating of nine out of ten because auto scaling works reliably and it handles traffic spikes well with minimal manual effort needed. There is a balance between simplicity and control. I have not given a ten out of ten because sometimes the scaling decision can feel slightly delayed depending on the metrics. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, but not as advantageous or granular as ECS or EKS auto-scaling. Customization is good but not fully flexible for complex architectures.

Read full review

reviewer2263239

Head of Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

PCF allows for fine-grained configuration, especially regarding scaling but routing limitations

Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice. A few things, such as what OpenShift does better are cluster management. Like, you can manage the entire thing together. Currently, it's possible to manage all the clusters, especially when it comes to cluster management using straightforward configuration. As of now, we have to handle each application instance individually, which means servicing them one by one. It would be better if we could perform these actions as a group or in a more streamlined manner. One more downside is actually the cost of this environment. So, major downside of Pivotal, it's the cost. So, the runtime running costs are very high. Extremely high.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"There is nothing that makes me frustrated while using AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and I would definitely recommend AWS Elastic Beanstalk to others as it is perfect for quick deployment with minimal infrastructure overhead."

"One of the most valuable aspects is that developers can access logs directly. They can download them from the AWS console within Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk helps reduce system administration as it automates many tasks."

"Elastic Beanstalk is very easy to use, providing infrastructure to deploy our third-party application to the cloud within 15 to 20 minutes."

"The simplicity in the speed of provisioning users is what I like best about Elastic Beanstalk."

"The management of environments is a valuable feature."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"The solution is stable, and we have not experienced any infrastructure issues, so it is very good and captures a few metrics, onboarding to App Dynamics."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very easy to use compared to other cloud technologies, and it has very good performance."

"It supports CI/CD, and is integrated with the CI/CD very well."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and that the deployment is easier."

"Stability is not a concern with this product."

"We find its stability and scalability valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to scale. The services that connect to the database are also very good."

"It is a scalable product...We are not facing any particular issues since most of the applications in our company are written in Java and .NET."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros

Cons

"Maybe the company could create more option packages, such as more bundles of configuration."

"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

"Logs and debugging can sometimes be cumbersome, and there could be a more seamless method to analyze application issues without relying heavily on CloudWatch, which would improve my experience."

"From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs."

"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

"There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future of Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry doesn't have certain advanced features."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve the documentation. They are good, but they could improve more. Additionally, it would be beneficial if there were more use case examples."

"It is not straightforward to setup."

"The initial setup was not easy, it was a bit complex."

"In the next release, they should offer additional applications for the databases, and improve the deployment experience."

"Scalability is terrible. So far we have not been able to scale it up."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."

"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."

"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."

"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."

"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

34%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

My experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good compared to other services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I was using AWS Elastic Beanstalk to deploy my application and to learn data engineering concepts. I used AWS Elastic Beanstalk to test how to change data from raw to useful cases. In that way, I u...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 17% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Render vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 26% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 18% of the time

Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 6% of the time

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

July 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

June 2026

Download Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report

Also Known As

No data available

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a scalable cloud platform known for its deployment ease, monitoring, and auto-healing capabilities. It supports Java and Spring Cloud frameworks, offering a stable environment for microservices and seamless CI/CD integration.

Pivotal Cloud Foundry facilitates cloud-based application development, focusing on private cloud security and developer-friendly tools. Open-source advantages lead to enhanced performance and innovation, providing robust deployment crucial for enterprise environments. While integration and documentation need improvement, its strength lies in microservice management, application hosting, and compliance with data residency regulations. The platform addresses migration and security challenges within enterprises, particularly in financial services, by supporting cloud transitions.

What key features does Pivotal Cloud Foundry offer?

Scalability: Dynamically adjust resources to meet demand.
Auto-healing: Automatically recover from system failures, ensuring stability.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlined processes for continuous delivery.
Microservice Management: Efficiently handle application components.
Security Features: Protect data in private cloud environments.
Developer Tools: Simplify application development with open-source resources.

What benefits should users expect from Pivotal Cloud Foundry?

Increased Stability: Reliable and consistent platform performance.
Reduced Deployment Time: Quick setup and initiation of services.
Enhanced Security: Robust measures for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes operational expenses for cloud transitions.

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is implemented widely in industries for deploying web and financial services applications, enabling microservices architecture within banking and enterprise environments. Its cloud diagnostic tools facilitate transitioning from on-premise to cloud-based systems, ensuring compliance with regulations and streamlined application hosting.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.