

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Azure Backup are two leading services catering to organizations' disaster recovery and backup needs. Azure Backup seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive set of features.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its high-speed recovery, integration with existing AWS services, and ease of use. Azure Backup is noted for its wide array of backup options, robust data protection capabilities, and comprehensive documentation.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users often mention the need for better support for non-AWS environments, enhanced management tools, and more flexible pricing options. For Azure Backup, users suggest improvements in the speed of recovery operations, the intuitiveness of the configuration settings, and better performance in large-scale environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer support. Azure Backup, while offering extensive documentation, is sometimes seen as complex to deploy. Users indicate that AWS’s customer service tends to be more responsive compared to Azure's.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is generally seen as cost-effective with a solid ROI, particularly for companies already using other AWS services. Azure Backup is considered slightly more expensive but valued for its extensive backup capabilities.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
The support from Microsoft is actually good; I have had positive experiences with it.
The technical support from Microsoft is good
I think the technical support by Microsoft is good overall.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
Azure Backup is scalable since it is a global solution.
The scalability of Azure Backup is quite easy and affordable to scale, with many improved features like data transfer.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
I would rate the stability of Azure Backup as nine out of ten; it shows high stability in my experience.
Azure Backup is stable for Microsoft environments.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It is not a perfect tool for restoring SQL databases since it requires replacing everything instead of restoring specific files.
Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots.
The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
Azure Backup is expensive relative to the value we get from it.
The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its simplicity.
It has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution.
The benefits I see from Azure Backup are that this solution is beneficial; we can access the data or files in Azure Backup anywhere, anytime.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.9% |
| Azure Backup | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Azure Backup provides efficient data protection with features like fast recovery and encryption. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering scalable, secure storage solutions. Users benefit from straightforward configurations and flexible retention, although improvements in hybrid integration are needed.
Azure Backup stands out with its comprehensive data protection capabilities, including features such as incremental backups and geo-replication. It ensures consistent security and performance through its scalability and redundancy. Users find the platform cost-effective and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services. While Azure Backup excels in many areas, such as ease of use and robust monitoring, challenges persist in hybrid environment integration and application-level backups.
What key features does Azure Backup offer?Azure Backup is widely used in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as financial services, healthcare, and government. It is ideal for organizations looking to back up virtual machines, manage disaster recovery, or support cloud migrations. Its adaptability allows businesses to safeguard SAP workloads and SQL databases efficiently.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.