No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (7th)
Hornetsecurity 365 Total Ba...
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
44th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery1.0%
Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup0.3%
Other98.7%
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Kavya S - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills
Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.
CiroValenzuela - PeerSpot reviewer
Mechanical Engineer Co-Op at a security firm with 11-50 employees
Seamless backup and extensive monitoring ensure comprehensive data security
Hornet Security is used to backup Office 365 mailboxes, Teams, SharePoint, Planner, and OneDrive for clients Hornet provides a solution for continuance backup even if a client's user mailbox goes down without any additional cost, ensuring data availability. Hornet offers unlimited space and time…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have never had any issues with scalability."
"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."
"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."
"There has definitely been a lot of improvements in recovery time with very less downtime because we already understand how to recover using the clear process that AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides."
"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."
"The solution's cost is reasonable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."
"Scalability is pretty good; it's seamless and can do it automatically."
"Hornet offers unlimited space and time for backups as long as the subscription is continued."
 

Cons

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. ​"
"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."
"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."
"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."
"However, the user interface and monitoring features could be improved to make the overall experience better."
"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."
"There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost."
"I would say it did not provide enough flexibility for all our backup needs."
"The price might be limiting for some clients in Latin America."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.​"
"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."
"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."
"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."
"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."
"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.
What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup?
Pricing might be a bit of a limitation for some clients in Latin America, although the product itself is good and provides excellent technical support.
What needs improvement with Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup?
The price might be limiting for some clients in Latin America.
What is your primary use case for Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup?
Hornet Security is used to backup Office 365 mailboxes, Teams, SharePoint, Planner, and OneDrive for clients.
 

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.