

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Quorum OnQ are leading solutions in the disaster recovery space. Users find AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery more cost-effective and flexible, but Quorum OnQ stands out for its robust feature set and perceived value.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers reliable scalability, seamless cloud integration, and integration with other AWS services. Quorum OnQ excels in comprehensive data protection, instant recovery capabilities, and ease of management.
Room for Improvement: AWS users note complexity in setup, a need for more streamlined processes, and improved deployment procedures. Quorum OnQ users suggest enhancements in initial configuration, better reporting features, and improved analytics and user training resources.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its flexibility in deployment but criticized for a steep learning curve and limited customer support responsiveness. Quorum OnQ is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, with occasional initial configuration challenges.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as more affordable, offering good ROI with its pay-as-you-go model. $0.028/GB of data stored per month. Quorum OnQ's pricing is higher but perceived as justified by its extensive features, leading to satisfactory ROI. $999/month per TB for comprehensive features.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
The URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
It's a little expensive.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Quorum OnQ provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| Quorum OnQ | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.