AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Security Cloud Control comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cisco is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.9% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Cisco’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,336 Views
1,336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Read 14 Cisco Security Cloud Control reviews

1,947 Views
1,947 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Cisco Security Cloud Control and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the security solutions category. Cisco has an upper hand in centralized rule management and device support, while AWS leads with integration and a cost-effective pricing model.

Features: Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized control of multiple devices, automated upgrades, and detailed reports. It supports ASA, FTD, and Meraki MX devices with encryption during storage and transit. AWS Firewall Manager provides auto-scaling, detailed analytics, and native integration with AWS services like WAF and Shield Advanced, supporting compliance monitoring and automated policy applications across AWS environments.

Room for Improvement: Cisco users desire better change visibility, reporting, and third-party integrations, facing challenges with bulk changes and analytics inconsistencies. Improvements in user interaction are suggested. AWS Firewall Manager can be overwhelming due to numerous features, with users requesting enhancements in logging, user interface, and threat intelligence integration. They emphasize a need for a more intuitive setup and reporting functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Security Cloud Control is praised for its tech support, crucial in addressing issues and improving product design. It supports Public and Private Cloud environments but lacks hybrid cloud support. AWS Firewall Manager mainly operates in Public Cloud environments, offering consistent and responsive technical support during deployments. Both products are commended for customer service, though Cisco tends to have a more direct feedback loop with its development team.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco's pricing is considered high but justified by its robust features, saving technician time by streamlining operations. AWS provides a cost-efficient pay-as-you-go model, accommodating various business needs with built-in cost governance. Cisco's ROI is seen through improved operation efficiency and reduced incidents. AWS offers competitive pricing balancing cost with AWS services, with users highlighting immediate value and seamless integration with existing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.9%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Security Cloud Control is 4.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Firewall Manager	3.9%
Cisco Security Cloud Control	4.2%
Other	91.9%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

Francisco Delos Santos

Security Engineer at Metrobank

Automation reduces intervention and speeds up threat prevention

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes The most valuable feature is the automation, as it reduces user intervention and allows us to focus on other tasks. Since the system is automated,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"My advice for anybody who is considering the AWS Firewall Manager is that it is pretty simple to set up and easy to use."

"The product is highly reliable."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"I like the upgrade feature. That is pretty valuable to me because I have dual ASAs and when I go through CDO it does it for me pretty well. It's all done in the back-end and I don't really have to be involved. I just initiate, pick the image, and I pick when I want it done and it just does it, whether I have a single ASA or have a dual ASA."

"The most valuable feature is the Intrusion prevention."

"It is saving us at least a week's worth of work because we can log in and instantly see what version all the ASAs are at and which ones need to be upgraded."

"The main return on investment is time, and the first time a firewall went down the savings probably exceeded what CDO costs."

"The most valuable feature is that you can push one policy or one rule out to several devices at a time."

"With Cisco Defense Orchestrator, we can manage the complete Cisco Security solution, and it provides a simple and centralized way to manage all products."

"Once it was up and running, I could see value from it straight away, in the first minute."

"Its ability to make bulk changes makes it much easier, that's for sure, when I have to upgrade multiple clients."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control pros

Cons

"AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"They can centralize all products and provide a correlation about an incident and the response. They can also provide an on-premises solution. Currently, Cisco Defense Orchestrator is just for cloud deployments, not for on-premises deployments. Customers have to manage it on the cloud. We are based in Vietnam, and most of the customers here prefer to have on-premises deployments. Customers, especially from banking and government sectors, do not prefer to do anything on the cloud. Some of the small enterprises use the cloud."

"There could be some slight improvements to navigation. In some of the navigation you've got to go back to be able to get into where you need to be once you've made a change. If I make a change, I've then got to go back to submit and send the change."

"The dashboard needs to be more customizable to provide better reporting for our network."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator can improve by providing more support for third-party security components."

"CDO doesn't have a report, an official report that I can check daily. It has another module called FTD, but it doesn't have that specifically for ASA. In the reporting, there are a lot of things that aren't there. There is also room for improvement in the daily monitoring."

"When logging into the device, we sort of had problems with it staying in sync. If somebody made a change onsite, it wouldn't do an automatic sync. It would have to wait, as you would have to do a manual sync up."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up."

"It would be a better product if it incorporated device control for third-party products easily."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"If you compare to what is available on the market, they are in the same range with respect to pricing."

"It's around £500 per unit for a three-year license."

"I work with a lot of clients, and the price or value of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator can vary from one client to another. If you have a lot of Cisco solutions, the price of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator is justified. Whereas if you have some security components from other vendors, such as Check Point or Palo Alto. This solution would be a pretty expensive proposition considering that they don't integrate with them well."

"It is covered under the CIsco Enterprise License Agreement (ELA). So, it is licensed and ours."

"It is about a $100 per year for an ASA 5506 firewall, and from there it keeps going up if you have a bigger box. For example, the 5516 is $200 to $300 per year."

"After our free trial was done we got a subscription for three years and it was under $3,000 or so. It's part of the EA we already paid for, so I don't know what it would be if it was a la carte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

University

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up. Additionally, I suggest impro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Those who want to use Cisco Defense Orchestrator should build their own use case and see if it fits their environment. The most significant benefit for us is the response time because it automates ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 19% of the time

AlgoSec vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 17% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiPortal vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Security Cloud Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

August 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Security Cloud Control

August 2026

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Defense Orchestrator, CDO

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized management, real-time visibility, and AI-driven automation for on-premises and cloud environments, simplifying scalability and deployment.

With a unified approach, Cisco Security Cloud Control enhances security posture by providing cross-platform insights across Cisco's ecosystem. It accelerates threat detection and optimizes policy enforcement through a blend of AI automation and natural language querying capabilities. The intuitive platform serves multiple devices, enabling comprehensive management of Secure Firewall, Secure Access, and other services with guidance from the Cisco AI Assistant. It also includes an AI Operations feature that identifies critical issues and provides real-time insights, enhancing response times while a policy analyzer improves security hygiene by detecting and closing security gaps. Its automation minimizes manual tasks, secures cloud-stored configurations, and supports two-factor authentication. However, it could benefit from improvements in navigation clarity, bulk change handling, and expanded third-party integrations.

What are the key features of Cisco Security Cloud Control?

Centralized Device Control: Streamlines management with bulk policy upgrades and automation.
AI-Driven Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances threat detection.
Network Visibility: Provides insights with valuable reporting and intrusion prevention.
Intuitive Configuration: Enables easy policy adjustments and restoration of secure connections.

What benefits can users anticipate?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational overhead with centralized management.
Improved Security: Enhances protection through automated policy enforcement and AI insights.
Time Savings: Simplifies management of multiple devices in cloud and on-premises environments.
Scalability: Supports growth with ease of deployment and policy consistency.

Industries implementing Cisco Security Cloud Control leverage its capabilities for tasks ranging from firewall management to intrusion prevention. Enterprises use it to streamline policy management, automate configurations, and integrate Cisco devices with cloud strategies, benefiting from simplified security orchestration and network segmentation.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Insurance Company of British Columbia, Shawmut

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.