Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS Firewall Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
AlgoSec offers detailed analysis and automation in firewall management, appealing for complex network security. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager ensures streamlined management across AWS environments, appealing for integrated, scalable policy management. Both differ in depth of analytics and integration flexibility.
Tufin Orchestration Suite typically has a higher setup cost, whereas AWS Firewall Manager generally offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure. Both solutions cater to different financial considerations based on initial setup costs.
Tufin Orchestration Suite typically has a higher setup cost, whereas AWS Firewall Manager generally offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure. Both solutions cater to different financial considerations based on initial setup costs.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud excels with user-friendly features, comprehensive administration, and integration, enhancing remote office security. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides scalable policy application and AWS integration, making it ideal for those deeply embedded in AWS environments needing consistent security measures.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud generally offers a lower initial setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager is appreciated for its comprehensive integration abilities and greater flexibility in adjusting configurations.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud generally offers a lower initial setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager is appreciated for its comprehensive integration abilities and greater flexibility in adjusting configurations.
FireMon Security Manager offers comprehensive, cross-vendor security features ideal for high-performance environments. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager is cost-effective with cloud-focused scalability but lacks extensive audit capabilities. FireMon provides robust on-premises support, while AWS is user-friendly for hybrid deployments.
FireMon Security Manager has higher setup costs compared to AWS Firewall Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making AWS the choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency.
FireMon Security Manager has higher setup costs compared to AWS Firewall Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making AWS the choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency.
Skybox Security Suite excels in managing large, complex environments with powerful compliance and scalability features. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides real-time visibility and seamless cloud integration, ideal for those prioritizing centralized management and quick deployment within AWS environments.
Skybox Security Suite generally involves a higher upfront setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager is often regarded as more budget-friendly in terms of initial expenses, making it an appealing option for cost-conscious organizations.
Skybox Security Suite generally involves a higher upfront setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager is often regarded as more budget-friendly in terms of initial expenses, making it an appealing option for cost-conscious organizations.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers extensive security management with ease of integration across firewalls; a tech buyer prioritizing automation and multi-location management may prefer it. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides scalable automation and customization, appealing to those deeply integrated into AWS's ecosystem.
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized control, robust automation, and cost-effective pricing, ideal for organizations with Cisco infrastructure. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides extensive cloud integration and real-time threat visibility, appealing to users needing comprehensive features despite higher costs.
AWS Firewall Manager has a straightforward setup with reasonable costs, whereas Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a more complex and higher-priced initial setup.
AWS Firewall Manager has a straightforward setup with reasonable costs, whereas Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a more complex and higher-priced initial setup.
