

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the security management solutions category, each offering unique strengths. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud appears to have the upper hand in stability and user-friendliness, while AWS Firewall Manager leads in scalability and compliance.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is known for its load balancing, SD-WAN capabilities, and integration with tools like FortiAnalyzer, all contributing to its excellent network performance and user-friendly design. AWS Firewall Manager excels with centralized policy management, automatic policy enforcement, and integration with AWS WAF and Shield Advanced, providing real-time visibility and compliance monitoring.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could enhance its navigation and extend data retention, with improvements needed in integration with third-party applications. Users have also expressed concerns about high pricing and frequent firmware upgrades. AWS Firewall Manager would benefit from streamlined features and better-organized documentation. Suggestions also include enhancing user interface customization and integrating native IPS/IDS support and threat intelligence.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers deployment flexibility across various environments, ideal for diverse infrastructure needs. Although its technical support is positively reviewed, some users note slow response times and knowledge gaps at initial support levels. AWS Firewall Manager, integrated within the AWS ecosystem, simplifies deployment and offers efficient support for specific queries, though it lacks the extensive documentation and partner support that Fortinet provides.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is seen as competitively priced but potentially expensive compared to its features, offering significant cost savings through easy management in larger deployments. Its value is in predictable pricing with minimal upfront investment. AWS Firewall Manager employs a pay-as-you-go model typical of AWS services. Despite perceived high costs, its value lies in cost savings from bandwidth optimization and efficient security management, contributing to a positive ROI through eased management.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate Cloud | 4.5% |
| AWS Firewall Manager | 3.3% |
| Other | 92.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.
Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.
FortiCloud can help with your wireless and security challenges in a number of ways. Our solution addresses common IT difficulties including time-consuming provisioning, high investment costs, complex management, vulnerability to advanced threats, and the need to easily scale with growth.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.