

Oracle Identity Governance and AWS Identity and Access Management are products competing in the identity management and access control category. Oracle Identity Governance holds the advantage in pricing and support, while AWS Identity and Access Management is preferred for its robust features and integration with AWS services.
Features: Oracle Identity Governance offers comprehensive identity lifecycle management, compliance features, and centralized user provisioning. AWS Identity and Access Management is valued for its flexibility, integration capabilities, and policy-based access control.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Identity Governance could enhance its user interface, reduce initial setup complexity and improve integration with non-Oracle applications. AWS Identity and Access Management might improve multi-cloud compatibility, curb its reliance on AWS ecosystem, and simplify its policy management for new users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Identity Governance is straightforward to deploy but can be complex initially, with strong customer support. AWS Identity and Access Management offers seamless integration within AWS environments and provides efficient customer support for quick problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Identity Governance has a higher setup cost but delivers solid ROI through its management capabilities. AWS Identity and Access Management offers a cost-effective model with lower initial costs and scalable solutions for AWS ecosystem users.
I believe AWS provides significant ROI by reducing infrastructure costs and improving scalability and business agility.
AWS Identity and Access Management ensures security and allows for scalable application deployment.
It saves time by not requiring extensive manual setup.
It is able to save time and money as everything is automated: user access provisioning, password policy management, and reporting.
Responses from AWS engineers aren't always direct, so when urgent issues occur, I manage them immediately and prioritize solutions.
The service is straightforward, and I haven't encountered much complexity.
We haven't needed to contact technical support as the IAM tool is intuitive and configured on our end.
I do have dedicated support called the PUMA support, and they are providing excellent service.
The team is not very knowledgeable and takes too long to respond.
While they are familiar with me, the team is not large enough, which impacts their availability.
Scalability in AWS is significantly easier compared to on-premise solutions.
I implemented centralized and scalable solutions to improve larger setups.
The system's scalability could be enhanced to support larger organizations and better integrate with existing applications.
It was initially tough to identify the cause, yet by simplifying user management and utilizing group roles, I have managed to solve these issues.
AWS Identity and Access Management is designed to keep networks secure by ensuring only authorized users can access necessary data.
AWS Identity and Access Management is very stable.
If AWS could provide an option to automatically create templates based on desired access requirements, it would be extremely beneficial, especially for documentation and troubleshooting purposes.
AWS Identity and Access Management needs improvement in the prevention of unauthorized access to sensitive data and models.
The user activity tracking in AWS Identity and Access Management should be enhanced to provide detailed descriptions of user activities.
Incorporating AI to reduce manual work would be beneficial.
Oracle Identity Governance is a thick, heavy application and has fewer application connectors compared to SailPoint, which offers a large number of out-of-box connectors, making integration easier.
Improvements could include making Oracle Identity Governance a simpler plug-and-play product.
Initial setups do not require significant capital expenditures, making it advantageous for organizations to utilize AWS services.
Azure is often chosen for cost-efficiency.
While it offers good value for money, a reduction in costs would be appreciated by any organization.
They sell the solution cheaply, but setting up and maintaining it becomes very expensive.
If you want to implement it at full scale, it's not an entry-level product; it's an enterprise-class product and it is expensive.
Oracle Identity Governance is very expensive.
The solution enables differentiation in tasks, such as managing cross-account access, setting service roles, and integrating corporate directories for temporary AWS access.
Its role-based access control enhances security by allowing me to assign specific permissions to users, which helps in managing access and maintaining cost control.
Specific permissions can be given to users, allowing tailored access to instances and S3 buckets.
The reporting function and Identity Audit function help with compliance, as they provide access review certification, segregation of duties, and a reporting feature.
The features I find most effective in Oracle Identity Governance include size and scale management, which is good for large organizations.
The solution's capabilities in provisioning, de-provisioning, terminations, and transfers are excellent.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Identity and Access Management | 1.0% |
| Oracle Identity Governance | 2.6% |
| Other | 96.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
AWS Identity and Access Management offers comprehensive security controls like role-based access, MFA, and password management. It streamlines user permissions and integration with AWS services, focusing on efficiency and security with features such as flexible access options and global usability.
Organizations rely on AWS Identity and Access Management to manage secure authentication and authorize access across AWS services. This service supports cross-account scenarios and corporate directory integration, providing a secure, scalable, and efficient platform. Despite its strengths, improvements could be made with a graphical interface for permission management, better workload handling, and enhanced documentation. It offers robust policy-based controls and adapts to global usage without frequent updates.
What are the key features of AWS Identity and Access Management?
What benefits should be considered when evaluating AWS Identity and Access Management?
Industries implement AWS Identity and Access Management to manage user permissions and access policies across AWS services, focusing on secure authentication and authorization within teams. It is crucial for identity creation, role management, and policy controls in sectors like IT, healthcare, and finance, supporting diverse account structures for compliance and security.
Oracle Identity Governance offers centralized identity management with features like lifecycle management and integration with other Oracle offerings. It ensures secure governance and efficient user access, catering to large organizations.
Oracle Identity Governance is known for its comprehensive lifecycle management, centralizing identity activities. It automates provisioning, de-provisioning, and self-service password reset, which enhances compliance capabilities and security. The platform supports integration with HR and custom applications, enabling efficient user access management. Although challenged by complexity and infrastructure requirements, which create a steep learning curve, it provides scalable solutions crucial for telecom, finance, and healthcare sectors. Users note its outdated interface and difficulty in setup. Cost remains a consideration accompanied by limited automation support.
What are the key features of Oracle Identity Governance?In industries like telecom, finance, and healthcare, Oracle Identity Governance is deployed to streamline user onboarding, access provisioning, and role management. It enhances operational efficiency with multi-factor authentication and integration capabilities that align with large-scale user management needs.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.