Axiom Team vs Devo comparison

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,893 Views
4,025 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Axiom Team

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axiom Team and Devo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiom Team vs. Devo Report (Updated: September 2026).

Axiom Team vs. Devo

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiom Team

Ranking in Log Management

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Observability (9th)

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (16th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Axiom Team is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
Axiom Team	0.5%
Other	98.1%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783832

Programmer 1 at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Logging has reduced costs and now provides fast queries and dashboards for lambda troubleshooting

Axiom Team excels at querying, with a query language that makes it very easy to assemble queries. The platform also makes it simple to create dashboards from logs. Axiom Team dashboards are used to monitor execution time, pricing, and errors. Axiom Team has positively impacted the organization by greatly reducing logging costs.

Read full review

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axiom Team has positively impacted my organization mainly in terms of cost, as we have reduced our logging cost by approximately half."

"Axiom Team has positively impacted the organization by greatly reducing logging costs."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

More Devo pros

Cons

"Axiom Team can be improved by ingesting logs faster, if possible."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

26%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axiom Team?

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience are not available due to lack of access to billing information.

What needs improvement with Axiom Team?

Axiom Team can be improved by ingesting logs faster, if possible.

What is your primary use case for Axiom Team?

Axiom Team is primarily used for logging Lambda functions and searching through those logs. When issues arise, the function logs are examined to determine what went wrong, and Axiom Team effectivel...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

Better Stack vs Axiom Team

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Datadog vs Axiom Team

Compared 19% of the time

syslog-ng by One Identity vs Axiom Team

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog Services vs Axiom Team

Compared 9% of the time

More Axiom Team Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Log Management

Download Axiom Team product report

Download Devo product report

Overview

Axiom Team provides data-driven solutions optimized for business efficiency, empowering users to make informed decisions with actionable insights and seamless collaboration.

Specializing in effective data management, Axiom Team delivers a comprehensive platform with tools designed to streamline operations and enhance analytical capabilities. Its user-friendly approach enables businesses to harness data effectively, fostering a collaborative environment where teams can thrive. Axiom Team stands out in the market with its robust features, ensuring businesses are well-equipped to tackle complex challenges and tap into emerging opportunities.

What are the most important features of Axiom Team?

Data Integration: Connects with multiple data sources for a unified view.
Collaborative Tools: Facilitates teamwork with shared workspaces and communication aids.
Advanced Analytics: Provides sophisticated tools for data analysis and visualization.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors the experience to meet unique business requirements.
Automated Reporting: Generates reports automatically, saving time and resources.

What benefits and ROI should be expected from Axiom Team?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Informs strategic choices with data insights.
Increased Productivity: Streamlines processes to save time and labor.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through optimized workflows.
Scalability: Supports business growth with adaptable solutions.
Improved Collaboration: Strengthens team dynamics and information sharing.

Axiom Team finds applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, adapting to the unique demands of each sector. In finance, it aids in risk management and performance monitoring. Healthcare organizations use it for patient data management and operational efficiency. Retailers benefit from insights into consumer behavior and inventory management, showcasing its versatility and industry-specific applications.

Axiom

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Axiom Team vs. Devo