Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

Axway and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Axway is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Redwood Software is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0. Axway holds a 3.7% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Read 9 Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer reviews

1,010 Views
980 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,008 Views
988 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer and JSCAPE by Redwood are significant competitors in the managed file transfer market. Axway AMPLIFY stands out for its superior support and favorable pricing, while JSCAPE impresses with its advanced features and operational flexibility, justifying its premium cost.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer provides robust integration capabilities, an efficient security framework, and compliance assurance. In contrast, JSCAPE by Redwood excels in automation, offers extensive protocol support, and ensures rich operational flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Axway could enhance its user interface to make navigation more intuitive, improve support for additional protocols, and offer more customizable automation options. JSCAPE could simplify its initial setup process, improve its pricing structure for smaller businesses, and enhance its reporting tools for better data insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway AMPLIFY is known for a straightforward deployment and strong customer service which aids in effective troubleshooting. JSCAPE, despite a slightly complex deployment, provides an intuitive setup and proactive support, ensuring efficient resolution of issues.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY attracts budget-conscious buyers due to its cost-effectiveness and promising ROI with lower initial costs. While JSCAPE by Redwood has a higher price point, it provides a superior ROI due to its advanced features and long-term efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is 3.7%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JSCAPE by Redwood	4.5%
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer	3.7%
Other	91.8%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Sayantan Sarkar

Technical Lead at HCL Technologies

User-friendly and doesn't take much space when getting installed

When it comes to the tool's scalability, I cannot say that everything can be done in the best version. There is always a scope for improvement. The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better. In general, everything is fine with respect to the tool's scalability. My company has encountered some challenges. The tool does not allow the explicit port for some of the protocols, like FTP. We are still selling the tool to some of our clients. I feel they should allow us to do some testing for the SMB-related protocols or Windows path-related protocols, which we are not allowing, making it difficult for us to identify the issue with respect to those SMB protocols as well as Amazon S3's protocols. I believe it is an area that needs to be fixed so that it will help the end customer do those types of tests without the help of another external tool. As of now, I can remember only these two scenarios where improvements are needed.

Read full review

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Versatile, streamlines the entire file transfer procedure, and offers good support

It might provide a more sophisticated and user-friendly experience, encouraging smoother interactions and facilitating simpler navigation for users using the application. The user interface (UI) could be improved. The absence of an extensive collection of ample training videos and comprehensive documentation within the current framework represents a missed opportunity. It could have greatly benefited new users, as such resources could have provided invaluable guidance, insights, and step-by-step instructions, ultimately aiding in the swift acclimatization to the software's functionalities and subsequently fostering a more intuitive and less daunting onboarding process for individuals who are just beginning to explore and engage with the software's capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer."

"The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"It is an easy-to-use and stable product."

"It provides a good amount of storage capacity for a reasonable price and has a good range of connectors."

"Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we have to do is open one port to this application, and we can remove all the firewall rules on that port. It's much more straightforward to manage from a security perspective. We used to rely on an archaic FTP solution, but Axway features SFTP, so it was an improvement security-wise."

"The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system."

"It makes a logical link between the inbound/outbound transfer, and makes it clearly visible. This is a very important feature for managing transfer with different environments, and it's very helpful in case of troubleshooting."

"It’s very flexible."

"The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering."

"Triggers are something that is very useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code, and we can define certain functionality of certain tasks also."

"It keeps a clear record of all the file transfers that take place, the person who initiated them, and the outcome of the execution."

"The JSCAPE MFT Server offers support for diverse protocols such as FTP(S), SFTP, SCP, AFTP, OFTP, and TFPT."

"We receive customized email notifications and alerts regarding user activities and the number of login attempts."

"It offers audit trails and reporting tools, allowing users to track file transfers, monitor user activities, and produce regulatory compliance reports."

"The speed of transferring large datasets is super quick, which allows us to work on multiple tasks at a time."

"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data."

"The areas in need of improvement are the monitoring and the cut-off management, when needed. Today you have at least two solutions: Buy the other Axway suite, Sentinel, or integrate it into your monitoring system."

"It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts."

"The initial setup was quite complex."

"The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better."

"We only hope that they continue to keep updating the solution and improving the offering. They could always do more updates and releases."

"Improvement in Data Encoding would be very appreciated (I'm thinking of ASCII-EBCDIC, ASCII-ASCII, etc.)."

"Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer cons

"The FTP/S and ad-hoc techniques can further be automated."

"The user interface is something that has to be worked on."

"The GUI has to be enhanced."

"Database crashing was seen whenever there was an overload."

"The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."

"The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming."

"With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

"Improving the error handling feature can help users to identify and resolve issues more quickly and efficiently."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AMPLIFY's license is a one-time investment."

"Pricing and licensing is related to the protocols you choose to support."

"The platform's price aligns with the market."

"It is quite expensive, and because of that, we get good service from them in return for the price paid."

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

There's infinite pricing available on their portal, however, it's typically accompanied by a discount. However, detailed pricing information is confidential and was not shared in this call.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement. They should have enhanced auto-reconnection capabilities for interrupted file transfers and implement features allowing chunk movement ...

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 25% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 21% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 16% of the time

MOVEit vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 15% of the time

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Competitors

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 38% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 37% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Control-M vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

August 2025

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Also Known As

SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY MFT

No data available

Overview

As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

Axway

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

September 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.