Azure Data Factory vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAP is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 3.2% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 93 Azure Data Factory reviews

11,197 Views
7,838 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

1,308 Views
798 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Azure Data Factory compete in the data management category. Azure Data Factory holds the advantage due to its advanced features and cost-effectiveness.

Features: SAP Replication Server is known for real-time data replication, high availability, and cross-database replication. Azure Data Factory supports broad integration capabilities, offers a user-friendly interface, and includes built-in connectors for over 100 data sources.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server needs improvements in cloud integration, user interface modernization, and scalability options for cloud environments. Azure Data Factory could enhance its monitoring capabilities, streamline its debugging features, and improve flexibility in complex scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server provides robust deployment for on-premise settings with specialized assistance. Azure Data Factory simplifies cloud deployment with extensive Azure cloud platform documentation and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server involves high initial setup costs, fitting enterprises with significant replication needs and ensuring good ROI in those cases. Azure Data Factory's flexible and scalable pricing models offer a higher perceived ROI due to lower initial investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (2nd)

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 3.2%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Data Factory	3.2%
SAP Replication Server	0.8%
Other	96.0%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

KandaswamyMuthukrishnan

Director at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Integrates diverse data sources and streamlines ETL processes effectively

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Azure Data Factory, there is a need for better data transformation, especially since many people are now depending on DataBricks more for connectivity and data integration. Azure Data Factory should consider how to enhance integration or filtering for more transformations, such as integrating with Spark clusters. I am satisfied with Azure Data Factory so far, but I suggest integrating some AI functionality to analyze data during the transition itself, providing insights such as null records, common records, and duplicates without running a separate pipeline or job. The monitoring tools in Azure Data Factory are helpful for optimizing data pipelines; while the current feature is adequate, they can improve by creating a live dashboard to see the online process, including how much percentage has been completed, which will be very helpful for people who are monitoring the pipeline.

Read full review

reviewer1834542

Finance Business Process Improvement, Transformation and Project Management at a consultancy with self employed

Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage

The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades. As a company, you're either hiring or paying an outsourcer to do that, and you have to manage it, keep up with the updates to the hardware, software, and the operating system. It's very expensive because there's a lot to control and take care of.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For developers that are very accustomed to the Microsoft development studio, it's very easy for them to complete end-to-end data integration."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and the readily available adapters for connecting with various sources."

"An excellent tool for pipeline orchestration."

"We have been using drivers to connect to various data sets and consume data."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Data Factory is the core features that help you through the whole Azure pipeline or value chain."

"I enjoy the ease of use for the backend JSON generator, the deployment solution, and the template management."

"The flexibility that Azure Data Factory offers is great."

"The tool's most valuable features are its connectors. It has many out-of-the-box connectors. We use ADF for ETL processes. Our main use case involves integrating data from various databases, processing it, and loading it into the target database. ADF plays a crucial role in orchestrating these ETL workflows."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

Cons

"There's space for improvement in the development process of the data pipelines."

"Data Factory would be improved if it were a little more configuration-oriented and not so code-oriented and if it had more automated features."

"The one element of the solution that we have used and could be improved is the user interface."

"Occasionally, there are problems within Microsoft itself that impacts the Data Factory and causes it to fail."

"It does not appear to be as rich as other ETL tools. It has very limited capabilities."

"Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."

"The speed and performance need to be improved."

"In the next release, it's important that some sort of scheduler for running tasks is added."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."

"Azure Data Factory gives better value for the price than other solutions such as Informatica."

"For our use case, it is not expensive. We take into the picture everything: resources, learning curve, and maintenance."

"I don't see a cost; it appears to be included in general support."

"The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."

"The solution's fees are based on a pay-per-minute use plus the amount of data required to process."

"I would rate Data Factory's pricing nine out of ten."

"Data Factory is expensive."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"It's a very expensive solution."

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Retailer

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 6% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

FME vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 13% of the time

Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

January 2026

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

December 2025

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

Microsoft

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.