No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Monitor vs Netdata comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th)
Netdata
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
23rd
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (15th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 2.3%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netdata is 1.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Monitor2.3%
Netdata1.8%
Other95.9%
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Andy Rabern - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily
I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.
Yash Dhawan - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Ops Engineer at Zeller
Real-time monitoring has transformed incident response and keeps critical workloads running smoothly
Netdata's best features are visualization, which helps operational efficiency and reduces downtime while supporting faster incident response, and real-time monitoring, which provides second-by-second visibility into infrastructure. The dashboard makes it easy to visualize, and it has the capability to create alarms with very low operational overhead, requiring much less maintenance compared to many traditional monitoring solutions. It is highly scalable for distributed systems, enabling me to monitor multiple services efficiently while maintaining responsive dashboards. The feature I find myself relying on the most day-to-day is the real-time monitoring and live dashboards, as it provides second-by-second visibility into infrastructure health, helping my team detect issues instantly instead of waiting. This feature is extremely useful during production incidents and troubleshooting, enabling faster root cause analysis and quicker response times. In many environments, engineers rely heavily on Netdata during CPU memory spikes, Kubernetes pod failures, network bottlenecks, and application latency investigations, which highlight the biggest advantages of using Netdata. Netdata has positively impacted my organization by improving downtime and incident response workflows through real-time visibility into infrastructure and application performance. The live dashboards greatly assist us, as instant metric updates allow me to quickly detect anomalies, resource spikes, and service degradation before they escalate into larger production issues. The overall improvement has been significant. In terms of specific metrics or outcomes regarding Netdata, there has been a reduction in downtime and faster incident resolution due to better monitoring capabilities. When infrastructure services degrade, such as during particular CPU usage spikes, I can visualize these events from the dashboard, helping me identify bottlenecks and conduct root cause analysis. These functionalities enhance visibility and proactive capabilities for faster anomaly detection, contributing to overall improved operational efficiency and infrastructure reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Transportation Company
64%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise29
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it...
What is your primary use case for Azure Monitor?
I am a developer who uses Azure Monitor for telemetry of the applications that I work on. Application Insights is one of those tools, and I have also used other non-Azure products before. Currently...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netdata?
As I am going with the subscription-based model in the SaaS, the pricing and setup cost are very nice, and the setup is very easy since I am running the server inside GCP.
What needs improvement with Netdata?
Netdata can be improved by incorporating AI-driven anomaly detection and predictive monitoring capabilities to forecast potential bottlenecks. Additionally, broader native integrations with enterpr...
What is your primary use case for Netdata?
Netdata serves as my real-time monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance monitoring, providing highly detailed real-time metrics with minimal setup and lo...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, New Relic and others in Cloud Monitoring Software. Updated: August 2026.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.