No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Site Recovery vs Cutover comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery
Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cutover
Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service
8th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery is 7.9%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cutover is 1.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Site Recovery7.9%
Cutover1.5%
Other90.6%
Disaster Recovery as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2142519 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions
There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.
Kalpesh Odedra - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Business Analyst at TD Bank
Collaborative runbooks have transformed disaster recovery planning and now improve team coordination
Cutover has positively impacted my organization through its collaboration capabilities, workflow management, and operational transparency. It has transformed the way our organization builds and manages comprehensive runbooks, streamlining the entire process from assigning appropriate resources and responsibility to aligning tasks with the overall execution timeline, ensuring that all activities are properly coordinated and that my teams clearly understand their roles throughout the process. One of the strengths of using Cutover in my organization is the ability to provide visibility into execution and outcomes. The platform has allowed us to review results, analyze performance, and identify areas for improvement following each exercise or event. This continuous feedback loop has helped us enhance our procedures, increase efficiency, and strengthen our overall operational readiness.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"A major benefit is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"You can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"The features I find most valuable in Azure Site Recovery include the test failover, which allows us to test our site recovery without bringing down the primary; disaster recovery provides that feature."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."
"By combining collaboration, organization, accountability, and post-execution insights, Cutover has become an invaluable tool for our disaster recovery and operational planning efforts."
"Cutover is the best artificial intelligence-enabled tool that can be used for automation, migration, and disaster recovery."
"Cutover has positively impacted my organization by largely reducing cycle time."
 

Cons

"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"The immutable backup could be better and should be improved."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration with other services."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"However, Cutover is available only at the enterprise level and is not available for startups or as an open-source tool."
"Currently, there are limitations around managing multiple self-hosted data source integrations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
"They have a license to pay."
"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?
A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.
What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?
The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...
What is your primary use case for Azure Site Recovery?
My main use case for Azure Site Recovery is that we are doing cross-region disaster recovery and processing.
What needs improvement with Cutover?
From what I have experienced with Cutover, it is a fantastic and very productive tool for things like disaster recovery, migration, or repetitive API tasks. All these things can be automated and sa...
What is your primary use case for Cutover?
Cutover is primarily used in my organization for automation purposes, mainly through the Cutover page.In my organization, Cutover was used as a migration tool for automating many tasks that would h...
What advice do you have for others considering Cutover?
Cutover should definitely be used as an automation tool, a migration tool, or a disaster recovery tool. The integration only has to happen in the back end one time, and if the integration is done, ...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Cutover and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.