


Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in web application protection. Azure Web Application Firewall holds the upper hand due to its extensive features and integration capabilities.
Features: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service includes automated threat updates, comprehensive reporting tools, and DDoS protection. Azure Web Application Firewall offers seamless integration with Azure services, advanced threat intelligence, and filtering capabilities to block false positives with custom rules.
Room for Improvement: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service could enhance its scalability, improve integration with third-party services, and offer more customizable threat rules. Azure Web Application Firewall might simplify its often complex setup process, improve ease of use for non-Azure environments, and possibly reduce its cost to offer better competitive pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is known for quick deployment and responsive customer service. Azure Web Application Firewall, despite a more complex integration process, benefits from being part of the Azure ecosystem, offering streamlined processes for those environments.
Pricing and ROI: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service typically offers a lower setup cost with effective support that ensures a quick ROI. Azure Web Application Firewall, though with higher initial costs, provides extensive scalability and features, appealing to organizations invested in Azure's ecosystem for long-term ROI.
My experience with the pricing or licensing of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is that many features can be accessed for free, so the pricing is definitely reasonable.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has positively impacted our organization by reducing cyber threats like ransomware and phishing by ninety-five percent.
For us, the biggest value comes from improved security and the reduced workload on the team, which makes the investment feel justified.
From an ROI and impact perspective, there is a 20 to 35% reduction in day-to-day administrative effort.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to contact them.
The technical support of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between five and seven at maximum.
They are good at troubleshooting and configuring things.
I am very satisfied with the response from Microsoft dedicated architects if it happens that I have to call for their support.
I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.
We had an incident requiring direct support, and the representatives were really helpful, resolving our query within forty-five minutes.
The engineers were helpful and knowledgeable, and we were able to get the guidance we needed.
I would rate Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service customer support as a nine on a scale of one to ten.
The scalability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall rates between 8 to 9, as it depends upon the use cases and what exactly the client needs.
Some Azure applications, like the web application firewall, require a certain level of SKU for hosting setup.
For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.
Scalability is good for Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service; we can scale up or down based on our needs.
As our needs have grown and we have added more applications, it has handled this expansion without creating extra management overhead.
The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
We have not faced any downtime, crashes, or lag.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is extremely accurate in detection and reporting, and I find very few false positives.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has been stable in our experience, and we have not faced any major downtime or service-impacting issues.
The product can improve by having more multitenancy capability, which is currently not available.
I think they're doing a good job with DNS and as support for any domains that I create or that my clients create, it's mandatory for me to ensure they have Cloudflare as their DNS provider.
And maybe something similar to Pushpin that Fastly has, which is an option where you can push messages that then can be scaled globally over the network.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.
The ROI they have given us is tremendous, and they are doing really well in terms of product, scalability, and service.
Modernizing the UI further, simplifying packaging and licensing clarity, enhancing the executive reporting and risk dashboard, and expanding broader cloud-native integration would be beneficial improvements.
There is one issue regarding local data storage, as they do not have that capability, and we are storing the data in another foreign country, which is against the law.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
This system allows us to pay only for what we use, saving a lot of money, so I give it a ten out of ten as it is both a money and time saver for the organization.
Barracuda service is customizable but external references note that licensing and cost planning can become complex.
While it may not be the cheapest solution available, we believe the security, ease of management, and operational benefits provide good value for the investment.
The custom rules and the geo-redundant geographical rule feature, which allows me to implement geographical rules for customers, add significant value.
The best features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall are multiple, including the WAF, rate limiter, and bot attack protection.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's advanced reporting and analytics tools add a layer that we're able to visualize and see before it actually hits the local firewall.
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.
The centralized dashboard is helping us streamline visibility across our admin panels and provides site-to-site visibility deployed directly to our AWS environment, securing VPC traffic and ensuring the firewall is in place.
One of the strongest points is the speed of deployment, which features a three-step deployment wizard, pre-built templates, and quick onboarding, making it suitable for teams that want protection fast without complex infrastructure setup.
I particularly appreciate its ability to automatically detect and block common web attacks such as SQL injection, XSS, and bot-based threats without requiring manual intervention.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloudflare Web Application Firewall | 4.5% |
| Azure Web Application Firewall | 2.2% |
| Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service | 1.0% |
| Other | 92.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall integrates DDoS protection, load balancing, and firewall capabilities. Its ease of use, configurability, and robust security measures make it a versatile choice for protecting web applications.
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall provides a comprehensive defense against threats with advanced reporting and robust security measures. It includes DNS integration, rate limiting, and extensive rule sets, all within a SaaS model that allows API configurability. Users value its caching, scalability, and pricing, although enhancements are needed in rate-limiting and third-party integration. Improvements in customer support, especially in India, real-time controls, and user documentation are also desired. Users seek a more intuitive dashboard, better log management, and improved alert systems, along with multitenancy capabilities and enhanced reporting.
What are the key features of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?Cloudflare Web Application Firewall finds application in industries like banking and retail by acting as a comprehensive security gateway, managing authentication and authorization while protecting web applications from malicious Layer 7 traffic. It also implements load balancing, CDN, and zero-trust policies, supported by advanced reporting, analytics tools, and threat scoring to meet specific industry needs.
Azure Web Application Firewall provides strong protection, easy setup, and smooth integration with Microsoft services. It excels in request filtering, custom rule creation, and protection against OWASP Top 10 attacks, ensuring scalable and reliable performance for businesses.
Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, affordable, and efficient protection against critical security threats like DDoS and SQL injection, with seamless integration with Azure tools, analytics, and AI capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle web requests through role-based access, automation features, and custom policies, especially valuable in cloud environments and ecommerce. Despite the need to improve reporting, management, proxy forwarding, and documentation, it remains a reliable choice for securing front-facing applications.
What are the most important features of Azure Web Application Firewall?Azure Web Application Firewall is widely used in ecommerce for securing transactions against cyber threats like phishing and SQL injection. It also supports reverse proxy setups, provides detailed log analytics, and offers layer 7 protection, making it suitable for businesses needing robust security for both front-facing and branch connectivity applications.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service streamlines cloud security with features like automatic updates, real-time detection, and bot protection. It enhances AWS environments with simplified management and threat intelligence.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service provides robust application security, leveraging automatic security updates and real-time attack detection to defend against threats. Its centralized dashboard offers an intuitive management experience, complemented by automated policies. Real-time threat intelligence, application control, and VPN support contribute to its security efficacy. Its capabilities to detect and prevent DDoS, application, and unknown OS attacks ensure comprehensive protection. Although licensing complexity, high costs, stability concerns, and regional compliance issues pose challenges, it effectively secures websites and email systems against malware, phishing, and ransomware, and simplifies cloud migration.
What are the key features of Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?In industries like e-commerce and finance, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is implemented for its effectiveness in securing cloud-based applications while reducing the need for on-premises equipment. Its strength in protecting both websites and email systems makes it a preferred choice for businesses migrating to cloud solutions.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.