

Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Web Application Firewall are competitors in the web application security category. Fortinet FortiWeb stands out for its advanced security features, while Azure Web Application Firewall excels in integration and ease of setup.
Features: Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust security profiles, application control, web filtering, and machine learning capabilities. It provides zero-day protection, virtual patching, and Layer 7 load balancing. Azure Web Application Firewall supports ease of configuration, seamless integration within Azure and AWS, and CI/CD support, making it ideal for swift deployments.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiWeb could improve upgrade procedures and centralized management capabilities while addressing hardware reliability issues. Azure WAF needs better documentation, expanded deployment guidance, and more competitive pricing plans for smaller businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiWeb provides diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, though initial setup can be complex. Its technical support is reliable but could benefit from faster response times. Azure Web Application Firewall is noted for its easy deployment, especially for users of other Azure services, and receives high ratings for customer service despite needing documentation improvements.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiWeb is considered cost-effective with various licensing options and noted for reduced maintenance costs post-implementation, although some view it as expensive. Azure Web Application Firewall is praised for fair pricing linked to Azure services. Both solutions show a good price-to-performance ratio, with Fortinet being cost-effective for multi-year licenses and Azure achieving cost-effectiveness through cloud integration.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
They are good at troubleshooting and configuring things.
I am very satisfied with the response from Microsoft dedicated architects if it happens that I have to call for their support.
I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.
Their support is truly exceptional when I compare it with similar large-sized companies.
The expertise of engineers varies across different time zones, affecting the effectiveness of the support provided, especially during our daytime.
The back-end development team is available, and if any issue arises, they will help us immediately by providing solutions when contacted.
Some Azure applications, like the web application firewall, require a certain level of SKU for hosting setup.
For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.
You can add additional boxes that combine together to achieve a bigger throughput for investigation and research.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
We have not faced any significant issues during deployments.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.
If the GUI includes notifications and improved logging capabilities that allow us to see traffic and store logs for six months, that would be very helpful.
Fine-tuning is a room for improvement in Fortinet FortiWeb.
After the customer submits a specific question and requests troubleshooting help from Fortinet support, it takes at least three to five days to provide a proper answer.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
For VM machines, the price increases based on CPU configurations of 2, 4, or 8 CPUs.
Most security products charge less at the time of purchase because of competition, but when we go to renewals, the prices become very high.
Fortinet FortiWeb is cost-effective compared to solutions like F5.
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.
Fortinet FortiWeb has positively impacted my organization because most of our servers and applications are secure from hackers and other security threats.
Fortinet's pricing is way more competitive than Cisco or Palo Alto.
The machine learning-based threat detection is significant, as it uses a learning method that eases the configuration burden, making it very useful.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiWeb | 4.1% |
| Azure Web Application Firewall | 1.7% |
| Other | 94.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 61 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 37 |
Azure Web Application Firewall provides strong protection, easy setup, and smooth integration with Microsoft services. It excels in request filtering, custom rule creation, and protection against OWASP Top 10 attacks, ensuring scalable and reliable performance for businesses.
Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, affordable, and efficient protection against critical security threats like DDoS and SQL injection, with seamless integration with Azure tools, analytics, and AI capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle web requests through role-based access, automation features, and custom policies, especially valuable in cloud environments and ecommerce. Despite the need to improve reporting, management, proxy forwarding, and documentation, it remains a reliable choice for securing front-facing applications.
What are the most important features of Azure Web Application Firewall?Azure Web Application Firewall is widely used in ecommerce for securing transactions against cyber threats like phishing and SQL injection. It also supports reverse proxy setups, provides detailed log analytics, and offers layer 7 protection, making it suitable for businesses needing robust security for both front-facing and branch connectivity applications.
Fortinet FortiWeb provides advanced web application protection, using AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration with Fortinet products, ensuring robust security and easy management. It's favored for its scalability in protecting websites, mobile apps, and APIs from threats like SQL injection.
Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust web application security with features like machine learning-driven threat detection, load balancing, and OWASP protection. Its comprehensive security measures include web traffic filtering and DDoS protection, making it ideal for securing APIs and web servers. Cost-effectiveness and easy deployment further enhance its appeal as it serves banking, e-commerce, and industrial sectors. Areas needing enhancement include load balancing capabilities, comprehensive documentation, and improved support response times, addressing user-reported issues such as false positives and integration challenges. Documentation for cloud deployment is crucial for enhanced logging and performance stability.
What are Fortinet FortiWeb's Key Features?Companies across banking, e-commerce, and financial sectors implement Fortinet FortiWeb for its comprehensive security features in protecting web applications from SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its use as a web application firewall provides essential protection and load-balancing capabilities, ensuring compliance with standards like PCI DSS in cloud environments and industrial settings.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.