Bacula Enterprise vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Bacula Systems and Quorum are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #28 with an average rating of 10.0, while Quorum is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0. Bacula Systems holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quorum’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

4,976 Views
3,185 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quorum OnQ

Read 22 Quorum OnQ reviews

4,793 Views
3,259 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Quorum OnQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and Quorum OnQ compete in the data management field. Quorum OnQ appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and user-friendly design.

Features: Bacula Enterprise is known for its versatility, high customization, and extensive initial configuration capabilities. Quorum OnQ offers robust data recovery, ease of use, and superior data restoration features.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise could benefit from enhanced automation, a modern look, and improved scalability. Quorum OnQ needs better integration options, further scalability, and enhanced support for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise users find deployment straightforward but requiring extensive initial setup and praise its responsive customer service. Quorum OnQ features a seamless deployment process, user-friendly design, and efficient, proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise users find the licensing costs acceptable with high ROI, especially for large-scale deployments. Quorum OnQ users acknowledge higher initial setup costs but find the ROI justifies the expense due to its superior features and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

28th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quorum OnQ

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

50th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

42nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise	1.0%
Quorum OnQ	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

reviewer2594778

Senior Application Analyst at a non-profit with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enhanced filtering for advocate emails

Quorum provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history. This is an extreme feature that will help our advocacy department a lot. It encompasses the ability to formulate emails and calls to action across regions. Their platform is more advanced than our previous one. It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"The support is outstanding and world-class."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"Bacula Enterprise, so far, has never let us down with their service and support."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"Quorum OnQ provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."

"This is the best money I spend on my budget."

"Quorum OnQ has a good ransomware protection feature, and customer service and support were very good."

"Having the ability to reduce recovery time, for critical resources, from multiple hours to a matter of minutes, is huge."

"Whether it is a single server failure, storage failure, network failure, a digital attack or a ransomware, or whether it's an application crash or a database corruption, or any kind of natural disaster or data center failure, Quorum ensures the recovery of the complete business process."

"This solution is very stable."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"It is not as feature-rich as a product like Veeam."

"Upgrading the software on the appliance feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated."

"It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions"

"We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them."

"Compatibility with other platforms is the issue. Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu."

"There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"We have a perpetual license."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quorum OnQ?

We launched all of our advocacy departments through Quorum next month. We are in the process of uploading all of our data and creating custom fields.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

HYCU R-Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 2% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

July 2026

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnQ

Overview

Bacula Enterprise offers robust backup solutions with extensive plugins for services like SAP HANA and Microsoft SQL, supporting multi-platform environments. It's valued for scalability, transparent licensing, and effective data recovery.

Bacula Enterprise serves organizations with diverse IT landscapes by providing scalable backup solutions tailored for platforms like Linux servers. Its extensive documentation and community support ensure smooth operation and reliability. Users appreciate features including deduplication, compression, and centralized management, contributing to efficient data protection for industries such as banking and healthcare. The setup process can be complex for some, and there is demand for a more intuitive interface, improved mobile support, and better GUI functionality. Despite initial setup challenges, Bacula Enterprise remains a trusted tool for data management with flexible resource utilization and security features.

What are the key features of Bacula Enterprise?

Extensive Plugins: Supports SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL, enhancing integration.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different IT environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing organizational needs efficiently.
Transparent Licensing: Offers cost-effective solutions with clear pricing.
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data.
Centralized Management: Streamlines data handling processes across systems.

What benefits should users seek in reviews of Bacula Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex backup procedures for technical teams.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes efficiency in data storage and retrieval.
Reliable Data Recovery: Ensures data can be restored effectively when needed.
Versatile Configuration: Supports easy customization for specific needs.

In sectors like banking, healthcare, and government, Bacula Enterprise handles large data volumes and secures backup tasks with encryption. Its multi-platform support is crucial for heterogeneous systems, executing scheduled tasks and data protection protocols efficiently, while fulfilling industry-specific compliance and reliability requirements.

Bacula Systems

Quorum OnQ offers disaster recovery and high availability with fast recovery, ensuring continuity by quickly spinning up virtual machines. It supports secure data management with 256-bit AES encryption and provides streamlined backup processes, enhancing data safety against threats like ransomware.

Quorum OnQ is designed for users needing efficient server restoration and data management. It allows seamless server recovery, automated testing, and versioning capabilities. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface and the ability to test virtual environments without operational disruption. Quorum OnQ enhances data safety through secure encryption and efficient backup processes. While it streamlines server monitoring with a "Single Pane of Glass" feature, improvement is needed in its scheduler design, enhanced disaster recovery testing, and OS support. The upgrade process can be lengthy, and better integration with cloud services like Azure is desirable. Quorum OnQ's pricing and support response times should be improved, and additional backup options for NAS and tape security are needed.

What are the key features of Quorum OnQ?

Quick Recovery: Ensures minimal downtime with fast server restoration.
One-Click Restoration: Simplifies server recovery to enhance efficiency.
Automated Testing: Validates backup systems through automated processes.
Secure Data Management: Utilizes 256-bit AES encryption for data protection.
Virtual Machine Spin-up: Allows non-disruptive testing of environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and system management.
Seamless Server Monitoring: "Single Pane of Glass" provides centralized management.

How does Quorum OnQ Impact ROI?

Fast Recovery of Business Processes: Minimizes downtime and restores operations quickly.
Enhanced Data Security: Protects essential data from threats like ransomware.
Efficient Integration: Supports seamless interactions with existing systems.
Operational Efficiency: Suits disaster-prone regions through reliable performance.

Quorum OnQ is used in industries where disaster recovery and data availability are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, making it versatile for backing up production and operational servers, including file, email, and financial servers, ensuring minimal business disruption.

Quorum

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ

August 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Quorum OnQ report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.