No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Application Protection vs Invicti comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...
Ranking in API Security
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Invicti
Ranking in API Security
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Container Security (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (16th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 4.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Barracuda Application Protection2.0%
Invicti4.0%
Other94.0%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Cyvogenix
Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services
One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.
PrashantUppuluri - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection
A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by reducing the noise, saving our websites and applications because it sits in front of them, which has been very beneficial, as I measured that impact by noticing fewer incidents, fewer downtimes, and better SLAs."
"Barracuda Application Protection has been a solid and dependable solution for protecting public-facing applications."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."
"I find the most valuable features of Barracuda Application Protection to be primarily the embedded AI, which makes our work significantly easier."
"Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by managing traffic well, enhancing access security, operational efficiency, and user experience, leading to customer satisfaction."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization significantly, as it has improved our security by reducing the risk of attacks such as SQL injections and cross-site scripting while enhancing visibility into security events through monitoring and reporting."
"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."
"The most valuable features that I've found in this solution was the level of accuracy and also that the process of scanning was very quick and we're easily able to change the frame of a scan."
"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."
"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."
"Netsparker has done an awesome job with its crawler, as it has found all of the links (also thanks to its good DOM parser)."
"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."
"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."
"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."
 

Cons

"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."
"Barracuda Application Protection can be improved as it still has a lot of false positives in learning mode and complex tuning is needed sometimes."
"Improving the operating system structure, firmware, and overall performance would enhance loading times for devices."
"Additionally, I can say that deeper API security features such as automation, API discovery, scheme validations, and improved protections for modern environments are needed."
"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."
"Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses."
"I think Barracuda Application Protection is already a good product overall, but the user interface could be more intuitive for new administrators during policy configuration or troubleshooting with a more interactive interface."
"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."
"It is a good tool, as we found out with the Community Edition trial, but the price point is quite expensive for a startup or average-sized company."
"The scan performance can be improved upon."
"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."
"Speed: It spends about one hour on scanning; I would like it to be less than 30 minutes."
"Improvement could be made in the area of production."
"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."
"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."
"I find that the scannings are not sufficiently updated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is competitive in the security market."
"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
"The price should be 20% lower"
"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Transportation Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?
My overall experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is fairly positive, as I feel the pricing is very competitive compared to similar web applicati...
What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?
Barracuda Application Protection can be improved as it still has a lot of false positives in learning mode and complex tuning is needed sometimes. Their support can be slow in critical situations. ...
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?
My main use case for Barracuda Application Protection is that we put this in front of our web apps, normally in cloud and sometimes in on-premises to filter traffic. A quick specific example of an ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...
What needs improvement with Invicti?
At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...
What is your primary use case for Invicti?
I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Netsparker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Application Protection vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.