No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Application Protection vs Invicti comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...
Ranking in API Security
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Invicti
Ranking in API Security
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Container Security (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (16th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 4.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Barracuda Application Protection2.0%
Invicti4.0%
Other94.0%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Cyvogenix
Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services
One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.
PrashantUppuluri - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection
A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization significantly, as it has improved our security by reducing the risk of attacks such as SQL injections and cross-site scripting while enhancing visibility into security events through monitoring and reporting."
"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by reducing the noise, saving our websites and applications because it sits in front of them, which has been very beneficial, as I measured that impact by noticing fewer incidents, fewer downtimes, and better SLAs."
"Barracuda Application Protection had a positive impact mainly in terms of improved visibility and better handling of automated attack traffic."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."
"Barracuda Application Protection has significantly improved security posture, reducing the attack surface using WAF plus API protection, automating threats with machine learning-based bot protections, providing zero-trust access to applications, and helping detect and mitigate threats in real-time, resulting in a 50 to 60% reduction in security incidents after deployment."
"I find the most valuable features of Barracuda Application Protection to be primarily the embedded AI, which makes our work significantly easier."
"Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"Invicti's best feature is the ability to identify vulnerabilities and manually verify them."
"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."
"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."
"NetSparker is a very easy to use and understand product."
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."
"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."
"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."
"I think Barracuda Application Protection is already a good product overall, but the user interface could be more intuitive for new administrators during policy configuration or troubleshooting with a more interactive interface."
"Additionally, I can say that deeper API security features such as automation, API discovery, scheme validations, and improved protections for modern environments are needed."
"The reporting functionality is quite poor in its current state."
"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."
"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."
"One area where Barracuda Application Protection can improve is in policy tuning and ease of configuration, especially for complex application and API-heavy environments."
"Barracuda Application Protection can be improved as it still has a lot of false positives in learning mode and complex tuning is needed sometimes."
"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."
"When scanning a large web-based application, it tends to process slow and takes a long time especially on crawling and attacking part."
"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."
"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."
"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."
"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"
"It is a good tool, as we found out with the Community Edition trial, but the price point is quite expensive for a startup or average-sized company."
"Maybe supported clients can be improved. It still does not search vulnerabilities in DB2 databases, for example."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."
"It is competitive in the security market."
"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Transportation Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?
My overall experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is fairly positive, as I feel the pricing is very competitive compared to similar web applicati...
What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?
Barracuda Application Protection can be improved as it still has a lot of false positives in learning mode and complex tuning is needed sometimes. Their support can be slow in critical situations. ...
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?
My main use case for Barracuda Application Protection is that we put this in front of our web apps, normally in cloud and sometimes in on-premises to filter traffic. A quick specific example of an ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...
What needs improvement with Invicti?
At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...
What is your primary use case for Invicti?
I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Netsparker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Application Protection vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.