Bitbar vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #27, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. SmartBear holds a 1.5% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Bitbar

Read 3 Bitbar reviews

977 Views
743 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,519 Views
2,358 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Bitbar

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitbar and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (10th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.8%
Bitbar	1.5%
Other	95.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1288116

Head of Digital & Cognitive Services at a tech company with 11-50 employees

A testing platform with a good API for apps, but pricing is complicated

I like that the AI Testbot is a near-zero code application for testing. For this use case, the function is good. The services are robust. Game testing and the API for apps are also good. From the perspective of pricing, licensing, ease of use, integration with other applications, impact complexity, and integration with other tools, we're pretty much very satisfied.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The overall product is awesome for device fragmentation, but not for automation."

"Game testing and the API for apps are good."

"Ability to use different frameworks."

"From the perspective of pricing, licensing, ease of use, integration with other applications, impact complexity, and integration with other tools, we're pretty much very satisfied."

"The feature that I like the most is that you can use different frameworks, whether it's APM or something else, and you don't need to worry about the framework."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration, which was particularly useful for my use case, allowing me to connect APIs seamlessly within the defined workflows in UiPath."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"It is a very scalable product."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."

"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

"Improvement of the product could be made by running the dashboard part, it gets stuck sometimes."

"Some stages of its automation is not working correctly and I need to make changes in the code created by Testdroid."

"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs Bitbar

Compared 9% of the time

BrowserStack vs Bitbar

Compared 8% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Bitbar

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MobileFirst vs Bitbar

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Bitbar

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbar Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Platforms

March 2026

Download Bitbar product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

February 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Testdroid

Test Suite

Overview

Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

SmartBear

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2026

Free Report: Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitbar vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.