Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks comparison

Bitdefender and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Bitdefender is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. Bitdefender holds a 1.0% mindshare in XDR, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Read 6 Bitdefender GravityZone XDR reviews

978 Views
929 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Read 104 Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks reviews

14,331 Views
5,876 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR compete in the XDR solutions category. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR has a slight upper hand due to its extensive features and advanced threat capabilities compared to Cortex XDR's pricing and support advantages.

Features: Cortex XDR offers strong integration, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and effective pricing strategies. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides robust endpoint protection, advanced threat intelligence, and value through effective security measures.

Room for Improvement: Cortex XDR needs to enhance its analytics capabilities, refine its initial configuration complexity, and reduce setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR could improve its operational efficiency, streamline its operations, and address its higher price point.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cortex XDR is noted for seamless integration but requires more setup finesse due to mixed reviews on configuration. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR benefits from straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, highlighting its user-friendly nature.

Pricing and ROI: Cortex XDR is recognized for competitive pricing and solid ROI despite concerns over setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, though generally pricier, offers substantial ROI, supporting its higher upfront investment with significant returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

24th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

104

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th), Ransomware Protection (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.8%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	4.8%
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR	1.0%
Other	94.2%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Setup is smooth and management is seamless, while improvements in email filtering transparency enhance efficiency

For data correlation, we just haven't worked long enough with it to assess its impact on our overall threat response strategy. We prefer a system that simply informs us when there is a problem; we don't want to engage too much in threat hunting. Therefore, we're not looking to create a SOC from this, which is also why we moved from XDR to MDR. There are areas for improvement, including the difficulty in getting the right handles on the applied email filters. It's sometimes unclear why one email is treated as spam and another is not, even if they contain similar content. Making the process of how emails are treated a bit more transparent would be beneficial.

Read full review

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since then, we are working with it, and so far, we have no problems; it's working smoothly with email security."

"I would rate GravityZone XDR more than nine out of ten."

"Scalability is pretty easy. It's easy to increase the capacity. You can just add on licenses to the existing license, and the duration of the license can be adjusted. For example, you've already bought a license for a year, and you want to add some more users. We can just add on licenses for the remaining period so that the entire organization can have the same expiry date. That makes renewal easier."

"I appreciate the overall utilization of AI to enhance security posture."

"It provides an in-depth analysis and gives recommendations, along with a historical search capability."

"The HyperDetect feature in GravityZone XDR is effective."

"The solution has an automatic patch management capability."

"I find that the auto-response capability is most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is that you can select remote access of any machine for sandboxing."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"Has great threat detection capabilities."

"Cortex XDR is a very capable solution for protecting large networks and a lot of endpoints. It's very useful because the automation is very high, and if you combine it with the features on Palo Alto firewalls, it provides very strong protection."

"Cortex XDR lets us manage several clients from the same console, and its endpoint defense is more advanced than traditional antivirus."

"The ability to kind of stitch everything together and see the actual complete picture is very useful. I guess you'd call it a playbook. Some people call it the forensics analysis of what was happening on particular endpoints when they detected some malicious behavior, and what transpired before that to cause that. It is also very user friendly. The way they have done everything and integrated all the solutions that they've purchased over the years to make it a very seamless, effective product is very good. One thing about Palo Alto is that they take the products or services that they purchase and make them seamless for the end user as compared to some companies that purchase other companies and then just kind of have their products off to the side or keep different interfaces. Palo Alto doesn't do that."

"The solution's stability is generally good."

"It'll not slow down your system when compared to others."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

Cons

"The resource consumption is high for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, nearly using one gigabyte of RAM, especially on Windows 10 and 11."

"The product could be improved by offering a single panel for the management of all Bitdefender products. Additionally, there might be a need to simplify the interface in the future."

"The product could be improved by offering a single panel for the management of all Bitdefender products."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"It's not very mature, and additional costs are involved."

"Another area of improvement is CPU utilization. CPU utilization could be improved."

"The resource consumption is high for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, nearly using one gigabyte of RAM, especially on Windows 10 and 11."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can improve mobile integration to allow access to the console."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

"The solution should add unwanted malicious hash values to a block list so that whenever the action is triggered, it will automatically prevent the malicious content."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

"The GUI could be improved."

"The price could be a little lower."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not the price of the software itself that makes it expensive. It's because you have to buy a VM; you have to buy additional hardware. All those things make it slightly costlier."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

The pricing of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

I am using SentinelOne not for MDR, only for EDR/XDR, because we wanted to use it for MDR, but the threshold for the required number of licenses to secure machines or users is quite high at 200, an...

See all answers

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 33% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 16% of the time

Secureworks Taegis XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 10% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone XDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

February 2026

Download Bitdefender GravityZone XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

February 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities, delivering comprehensive security insights tailored for knowledgeable audiences.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR amplifies security operations across environments, ensuring high-level detection and response. It integrates seamlessly, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with its innovative threat intelligence. Efficiently designed, it addresses evolving threats, empowering IT professionals to maintain robust cyber defenses.

What are the most important features of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses behavioral analysis to accurately identify threats.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights for improved threat visibility.
Scalability: Adapts to different network sizes ensuring consistent protection.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automated response capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances overall threat readiness.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential losses from undetected attacks.
Operational Efficiency: Minimizes manual monitoring with automation.
Adaptability: Quickly adjusts to newer threats with flexible configuration.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR plays a crucial role in safeguarding sensitive data. Its integration enables institutions to combat sophisticated threats, ensuring compliance and data integrity without compromising operational efficiency.

Bitdefender

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

December 2025

Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.