BMC Helix Client Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager comparison

BMC Helix and CyberArk are both solutions in the Endpoint Compliance category. BMC Helix is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while CyberArk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8. BMC Helix holds a 8.3% mindshare in EC, compared to CyberArk’s 10.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

BMC Helix Client Management

Read 7 BMC Helix Client Management reviews

1,389 Views
264 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

5,419 Views
434 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

BMC Helix Client Management

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and BMC Helix Client Management compete in the enterprise security and client management category. While both offer strong security features, CyberArk has the upper hand in enhancing security postures, whereas BMC Helix excels in operational efficiency for IT environments.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager provides password management, session management, and centralized administration. It ensures endpoint protection and compliance with its least privilege enforcement and platform integration capabilities. BMC Helix Client Management offers valuable remote control, patch management, and seamless IT environment integration, enhancing operational efficiency and client management.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk faces performance issues, complex administration, and high costs, with users seeking enhancements in integration and support. BMC Helix Client Management could improve MDM support for Android and add vulnerability assessments. CyberArk users desire streamlined setup and better technical support, while BMC Helix users seek improved discovery and patch management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk offers diverse deployment options, both on-premises and cloud, but users report mixed customer service experiences, highlighting delays and the need for better support staff. BMC Helix, available in on-premises and cloud, receives mixed reviews on customer support, indicating a need for quicker response times. CyberArk is praised for its resources and community for self-resolution, yet both could improve escalation processes and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk is perceived as expensive but offers a strong security ROI with reduced threats and efficiency savings, although it may deter small businesses due to cost. BMC Helix is more affordable, providing flexible licensing options attractive for cost-effective client management. CyberArk delivers significant security ROI, whereas BMC Helix offers value through affordability and operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Client Management

Ranking in Endpoint Compliance

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Device Management (MDM) (8th)

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Endpoint Compliance

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Compliance category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Client Management is 8.3%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 10.8%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Compliance Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	10.8%
BMC Helix Client Management	8.3%
Other	80.9%

Endpoint Compliance

Featured Reviews

Cristian Testa

Presales Manager Product Manager - Latin America Region at tdi

A stable solution that allows you to manage IT clients from receipt to retirement

The initial setup is straightforward and easy to use, but you need to understand the different functionalities and modules. The console version and the Hub application are different, and you need some knowledge to make the process easier. Deployment typically takes about two months. You start with the initial setup and then continue with operations. The deployment process is straightforward. The master installation takes about thirty minutes. After that, you deploy different relays to discover the endpoints and create the credentials and sources to install the agents. Once the agent is installed on an endpoint, you can manage it as needed. The first step is always the installation. BMC Client Management can be deployed both on cloud and on-premises. After the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased need for remote solutions, so we have customers using both models. In BMC Client Management, I'd rate the initial setup as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Diego Rivera

Commercial and Technical Professional Manager at Evolution Technologies Group

Strengthening financial services infrastructure by safeguarding and integrating with ecosystems

We use CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to complement a privilege access management solution in order to avoid golden ticket attacks and strengthen services against attacks. It serves as a complement to our asset management solution. The architecture of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is beneficial for integrating with all customer ecosystems; it's easy to deploy, and achieving that level of integration and control is more challenging with other solutions. The ability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to safeguard our financial services infrastructure is very important, as we need to record actions on privileges in our information systems. Regarding the granularity of the managed controls in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, we have different levels of features to define compensations and capabilities, which help us verify configurations and access, ultimately keeping the safety of rights intact. Our initial challenge with CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is to comply with Colombian regulations in the financial sector, particularly identifying users and managing password changes and rotations. We needed to certify the identities and provide necessary information for government investigations, if required. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very important for helping our organization meet compliance and regulatory requirements. We have to comply with international regulations such as SOC, but also with local regulations unique to the financial sector, which is crucial for us due to the high risks involved. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helped us reduce the time for regulatory processes to approximately two to four months, completing the solution and training. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has helped us reduce the mean time to detect within our organization. That's our main goal. Regarding MTTD, the solution provides enough information to enhance our overall detection process. We have an 85% improvement in MTTD. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helps ensure data privacy through strategies that manage information in real-time. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helps save costs by avoiding risks and future expenses associated with security incidents. It's essential to communicate the value of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to users, as its controls help improve system security. My role at the company involves service and sales activities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a scalable solution. We have deployed it for customers using 3000 nodes to those using 300,000 nodes."

"One feature I like, that was especially valuable during the pandemic, is remote control. Remote control grants administrators and support personnel access to the laptops and PCs of employees (who might be working from home) in order to fix any issues that come up as and when they come up, even without having to wait for a support request."

"One of our customers is a financial institution with more than 15,000 endpoints, and we use BMC Client Management to manage their regulatory compliance needs, manage the endpoints from a security perspective, and integrate it with service management as well."

"The support from BMC Client Management is very good."

"BMC Client Management is a stable solution and one of the best in the market. It allows me to manage all recipe endpoints, including iOS, Android, Linux, Unix, and Windows, all within the same solution."

"The solution provides multiple features in one place."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its patching capabilities and the help it offers when it comes to use cases, like prompting for the reboot after a certain period of time."

"BMC Client Management has helped us be able to patch our OS or any software to the latest version."

More BMC Helix Client Management pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights. Even if developers and senior folks maintain their admin rights, we can still manage their activities."

"The solution is pretty mature and can accommodate our use cases quite well."

"Their customer support was excellent."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."

"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has had a positive impact on my customers' security posture."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

Cons

"BMC Client Management supports only iOS devices. It would be good if they would support Android as well."

"It would be good if BMC Client Management can perform vulnerability assessment scanning at the endpoint on its own and mitigate that. Then, we wouldn't have to rely on a third party VA tool."

"BMC Client Management could improve in the area of integration."

"The on-premises version of BMC Client Management has powerful remote control functionality and decent compliance features, but these features both rely on the discovery tool in order to gain a complete set of insights about the endpoint's environment. Now, BMC's discovery solution depends on having an agent installed in each endpoint and sometimes the agent doesn't work properly, making it difficult to get an accurate understanding of the environment (including special topologies) even with BMC's discovery tool."

"In BMC Client Management, I would like to see more features for executing commands remotely. For example, with SAP, there isn't the capability to execute all the commands available in the console. The latest version includes more endpoints, but they do not cover everything the operations team needs. Additionally, I think improving the hierarchy for managing endpoints is crucial. Extending the endpoint capabilities would be highly beneficial."

"The solution does not offer the functionality of remote access to users."

"The solution needs to add whitelisting because many customers request it."

"It would be good if BMC Client Management can perform vulnerability assessment scanning at the endpoint on its own and mitigate that. Then, we wouldn't have to rely on a third party VA tool. I would like to see this application move to being a web-based one."

More BMC Helix Client Management cons

"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."

"Without knowledge, you are not able to find some items as they are really hidden within the UI."

"Despite newer versions and functionalities, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks sufficient knowledgeable support staff, resulting in longer wait times for assistance."

"The solution is good but can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."

"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BMC Client Management is a high-priced solution, but given its performance and capabilities, I think it offers great value. I don't have the exact number for the yearly licensing costs. I believe there is an additional cost of around two hundred dollars."

"To use BMC Client Management they charge annually per node."

"BMC Client Management is a very affordable solution. There is one main server license which I believe is around $1,000 per year, and then there is the license for the actual solution. With the solution license, you can opt for a suite license where you get access to all the features and benefits, or alternatively you can buy any of the five main components of the suite license individually."

"The solution is low cost."

"I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing to pay this money."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Compliance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

12%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Client Management?

BMC Client Management is a high-priced solution, but given its performance and capabilities, I think it offers great value. I don't have the exact number for the yearly licensing costs. I believe t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Client Management?

In BMC Client Management, I would like to see more features for executing commands remotely. For example, with SAP, there isn't the capability to execute all the commands available in the console. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Client Management?

The most common use cases for BMC Client Management among my clients include managing inventory and deployment of a software package.

See all answers

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BMC Helix Client Management

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs BMC Helix Client Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jamf Pro vs BMC Helix Client Management

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs BMC Helix Client Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs BMC Helix Client Management

Compared 8% of the time

More BMC Helix Client Management Competitors

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

April 2026

Download BMC Helix Client Management product report

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

May 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Also Known As

BMC Helix Client Management, Helix Client Management, BMC Fromdistance Mobile Device Management

Viewfinity

Overview

BMC Helix Client Management offers robust systems management capabilities, focusing on patch management, software licensing, and remote administrative access, crucial for compliance and security.

BMC Helix Client Management enables efficient endpoint management across diverse systems with features like software deployment, inventory control, and compliance management. Offering stable performance, the SaaS version excels in supporting IT managers in regulatory compliance while managing thousands of endpoints. Users find the remote control feature exceptionally useful in remote work settings, facilitating updates and issue resolution seamlessly. There is a growing demand for enhancements such as Linux and Android support, improved integration, and mobile device management. Additionally, clients suggest the inclusion of vulnerability assessment, better agent reliability, application whitelisting, and refined remote command execution capabilities.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Client Management?

Patch Management: Streamlines deployment and updates to ensure security compliance.
Software License Management: Optimizes usage and adheres to licensing agreements.
Remote Control Access: Facilitates remote troubleshooting and updates without delays.
Inventory Management: Provides comprehensive oversight of software assets.
Compliance Management: Assists in maintaining regulatory standards across endpoints.

What benefits should users expect from BMC Helix Client Management?

Cost Reduction: Enhances operational efficiency and license use, leading to cost savings.
Management Efficiency: Simplifies overseeing large endpoint environments.
Security Enhancement: Ensures strict compliance with security protocols, reducing risk.
Improved Support for Remote Work: Seamless updates and troubleshooting improve remote productivity.

In the tech-savvy industry, BMC Helix Client Management proves invaluable for IT managers tasked with software deployment and comprehensive endpoint oversight. Users in heavily regulated sectors leverage its capabilities for ensuring compliance and optimizing resource usage, ultimately driving management efficiency and reducing operational costs.

BMC Helix

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security by controlling access, removing admin rights, and managing privileges. It supports diverse environments with simple integration, focusing on credential detection, threat protection, and compliance.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager secures enterprise passwords, monitors session connections, and enhances cybersecurity by controlling privileged access. It blocks unauthorized applications, monitors user activities, and secures credentials across platforms. Key areas include Just-In-Time Access, privilege separation, and local administrator password rotation. While robust, challenges exist with performance, complexity, and setup. Integration with Linux and Unix needs improvement, requiring advanced reporting tools and easier policy management. Pricing concerns and maintenance issues with Windows servers persist, as well as database issues in the on-prem version.

What are the key features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Admin Rights Removal: Eliminates unnecessary permissions to enhance security.
Privilege Management: Offers detailed control over user access rights.
Password Rotation: Automatically updates passwords to protect sensitive data.
Threat Protection: Blocks malicious applications and threats proactively.
Audit Capabilities: Provides comprehensive security and compliance tracking.
Application Control: Confines access to authorized applications only.
Automatic Updates: Ensures security protocols and software remain current.

What benefits should organizations expect from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risks by controlling credential and application access.
Compliance Assurance: Meets industry standards through thorough tracking and reporting.
Scalable Integration: Adapts to different environments smoothly.
Reduced Management Efforts: Automates credential and policy management.

Organizations deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from secure credential management across Unix, AWS, and GCP. By implementing privilege separation and monitoring user activities, they achieve effective risk mitigation and compliance across multiple platforms.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Charter Manufacturing

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

April 2026

Free Report: BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Helix Client Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report.

See our list of best Endpoint Compliance vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Compliance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.