BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs DX Performance Management comparison

BMC Helix and Broadcom are both solutions in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category. BMC Helix is ranked #2, while Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. BMC Helix holds a 22.9% mindshare in ICP, compared to Broadcom’s 15.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Read 2 BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reviews

671 Views
195 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

1,400 Views
98 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

DX Performance Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization and DX Performance Management are competing solutions in IT operations and performance management. BMC Helix holds an advantage in pricing due to its cost-effectiveness, whereas DX Performance Management stands out in features offering deeper insights and value.

Features: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization provides robust resource optimization with advanced analytics and predictive insights. DX Performance Management offers comprehensive performance metrics, detailed visualizations, and extensive data customization. The key difference is BMC Helix’s focus on resource efficiency compared to DX’s emphasis on detailed performance insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization facilitates a straightforward deployment process with efficient integration and strong customer support. DX Performance Management has a more complex deployment model but is complemented by highly responsive customer service and detailed implementation guidance, highlighting simplicity versus support emphasis.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization offers competitive pricing and solid ROI, emphasizing cost-effective resource management. DX Performance Management may have higher setup costs but provides substantial ROI with its rich feature set, making it a valuable investment for enhanced performance insights. The divergence is between BMC Helix's affordability and DX’s feature-driven return.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning

2nd

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (29th), Cloud Cost Management (38th)

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (43rd), DX NetOps (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is 22.9%, down from 33.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Performance Management is 15.1%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure Capacity Planning Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX Performance Management	15.1%
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization	22.9%
Other	62.0%

Infrastructure Capacity Planning

Featured Reviews

Appperf677

Application Performance Mnagement Specialist at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level

Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.

Read full review

reviewer1810893

Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring

Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."

"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."

"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."

"It gave us one location, one place to do all of group administration, and to build dashboards, and device administration, inventory counts... it really reduced our overall administrative overhead."

"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."

"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."

"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."

"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."

More DX Performance Management pros

Cons

"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."

"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. "

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

"This solution is not very scalable."

"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."

"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved."

"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."

More DX Performance Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?

I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?

I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Cloud Optimizer vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 19% of the time

Precisely Capacity Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 16% of the time

ITRS Capacity Planner vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 16% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 11% of the time

More BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Competitors

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs DX Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kentik vs DX Performance Management

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Cloud Optimizer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management

February 2026

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization report

Download BMC Helix Continuous Optimization product report

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

February 2026

Download DX Performance Management product report

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization, BMC Helix Optimize, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

CA Performance Management

Overview

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is a comprehensive performance and capacity management solution designed to help enterprises optimize IT resources, enhancing operational efficiency while managing costs effectively.

It provides predictive analytics and modeling capabilities, allowing businesses to meet evolving demands seamlessly. By proactively identifying resource constraints and predicting future trends, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization assists organizations in aligning IT resources with business objectives. This strategic approach ensures optimized performance, resource allocation, and cost management with enhanced insights.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Predictive Analytics: Utilizes advanced algorithms to forecast future resource requirements.
Capacity Planning: Facilitates strategic planning to manage capacity effectively.
Anomaly Detection: Identifies unusual patterns that could impact performance.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides insights with tailored views for better decision-making.

What benefits can be expected from BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
Increased Efficiency: Enhances productivity by aligning resources with demand.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help with strategic planning.
Risk Mitigation: Early detection of performance issues reduces downtime.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is leveraged by industries like financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications to ensure resource efficiency. These sectors benefit from predictive modeling and capacity planning capabilities, enabling them to adapt to fast-changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

BMC Helix

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Dilliard's

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management

February 2026

Free Report: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management report.

See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.