Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs OpenText Cloud Optimizer comparison

BMC and OpenText are both solutions in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category. BMC is ranked #1, while OpenText is ranked #3. BMC holds a 28.8% mindshare in ICP, compared to OpenText’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...
Read 2 BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reviews
  • 392 Views
  • 235 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Cloud Optimizer
Read 2 OpenText Cloud Optimizer reviews
  • 189 Views
  • 183 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization and OpenText Cloud Optimizer are products in the realm of cloud-based optimization solutions. OpenText Cloud Optimizer seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and integrations, whereas BMC Helix excels in usability and support resources.

Features: BMC Helix offers advanced predictive analytics, resource optimization, and dynamic thresholds for capacity management. OpenText provides robust data scaling, multi-cloud management, and comprehensive workload automation capabilities. The core distinction lies in BMC Helix's focus on predictive tools and OpenText's emphasis on automation and integration functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Helix is often noted for its streamlined deployment process and responsive support. OpenText offers flexible deployment with detailed configurations but may require more initial setup time. The key difference is BMC Helix's immediate accessibility and OpenText's customizability.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Helix features scalable pricing with a faster ROI due to its rapid deployment and immediate impact. OpenText's pricing aligns with its extensive functionalities, offering higher long-term value through its comprehensive solutions. The distinction is between BMC Helix's quicker cost-effectiveness and OpenText's potential for maximizing value over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,391 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...
Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning
1st
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (28th), Cloud Cost Management (34th)
OpenText Cloud Optimizer
Ranking in Infrastructure Capacity Planning
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Infrastructure Capacity Planning category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is 28.8%, down from 33.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Cloud Optimizer is 12.5%, down from 22.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure Capacity Planning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization28.8%
OpenText Cloud Optimizer12.5%
Other58.7%
Infrastructure Capacity Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Appperf677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level
Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.
Read full review
Prem Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives an overview of the entire infrastructure and helps with the optimization and capacity planning
It is not very easy, but it is also not very complex. You need good technical expertise to understand how to work with the product. The deployment duration depends on the scope of work. It depends on how much integration you need. This product can integrate with many other applications. It depends on whether you want to integrate or whether you want a standalone system. It depends on how many different systems you need to capture the data from. Do you want to integrate with a reporting product? Depending upon that, you have to decide. The product installation takes one or two days, but you need to define a use case for what you want to do after the installation.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."
"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."
"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"
"It helps to plan how you can scale up your environment, and it gives an overview of your entire infra."
"Easy access to resources of our cloud."
 

Cons

"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."
"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."
"It needs to improve the capacity planning."
"It should have more reporting features. It will help in getting more reporting information."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."
"It depends on the agreement that you have with Micro Focus. It can be a year-based term. It can be perpetual, or it can be subscription-based. Depending upon whether you're looking for an annual or a multi-year contract, the pricing would vary. It also depends on whether you are looking for standard support or premium support."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,391 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 100% of the time
More BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management
July 2025
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reportDownload BMC Helix Continuous Optimization product report
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer
July 2025
OpenText Cloud Optimizer reportDownload OpenText Cloud Optimizer product report
 

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization, BMC Helix Optimize, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Micro Focus Cloud Optimizer, HPE vPV, HPE Cloud Optimizer
 

Overview

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is a comprehensive performance and capacity management solution designed to help enterprises optimize IT resources, enhancing operational efficiency while managing costs effectively.

It provides predictive analytics and modeling capabilities, allowing businesses to meet evolving demands seamlessly. By proactively identifying resource constraints and predicting future trends, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization assists organizations in aligning IT resources with business objectives. This strategic approach ensures optimized performance, resource allocation, and cost management with enhanced insights.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?
  • Predictive Analytics: Utilizes advanced algorithms to forecast future resource requirements.
  • Capacity Planning: Facilitates strategic planning to manage capacity effectively.
  • Anomaly Detection: Identifies unusual patterns that could impact performance.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Provides insights with tailored views for better decision-making.
What benefits can be expected from BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?
  • Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
  • Increased Efficiency: Enhances productivity by aligning resources with demand.
  • Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help with strategic planning.
  • Risk Mitigation: Early detection of performance issues reduces downtime.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is leveraged by industries like financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications to ensure resource efficiency. These sectors benefit from predictive modeling and capacity planning capabilities, enabling them to adapt to fast-changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

BMC

OpenText Cloud Optimizer is a unified capacity management and performance tool that enables you to monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize hybrid cloud environments quickly, efficiently, and with rapid results. Cloud Optimizer's unified dashboard provides comprehensive insights into capacity, performance, and health across hybrid cloud environments. With this consolidated insight you can optimize your infrastructure and quickly solve virtualization and cloud performance issues. Cloud Optimizer works with multiple hypervisors and private and public cloud environments including Micro Focus Helion OpenStack, VMware, Microsoft, Hyper-V, KVM, Xen, OpenStack, and Amazon Web Services.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Dilliard's
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer
July 2025
Free Report: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,391 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer report.
See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.