Camunda and Boomi AtomSphere Flow compete in workflow automation and integration. Boomi AtomSphere Flow holds an edge due to its extensive features and quicker integration capabilities.
Features: Camunda offers open architecture, developer-friendly tools, and robust automation capabilities for complex workflows. Boomi AtomSphere Flow provides extensive integration features, supporting diverse systems and applications for enhanced flexibility.
Room for Improvement: Camunda may improve in reducing complexity for non-developers and expanding pre-built connectors. Boomi AtomSphere Flow could enhance customization options, user documentation, and pricing flexibility for small enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers cloud-native deployment with efficient support, minimizing infrastructure overhead. Camunda requires more setup with self-hosted deployment, allowing greater customization suitable for tech-savvy teams.
Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source nature means lower upfront costs. Boomi AtomSphere Flow justifies higher costs with quicker integration and extensive features, leading to a faster ROI for diverse capabilities.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They really understand deeply and in detailed fashion the solution.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
ECS and Fargate make horizontal scalability very easy.
They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
We were not really concerned about the performance on the process itself because it was super simple, super straightforward, and it did not present itself as a bottleneck, nor did we feel it was adding additional time in the execution.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 9.9% |
| Boomi AtomSphere Flow | 1.0% |
| Other | 89.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
