Aug 24, 2021
Me too
We compared Camunda Platform and IBM BPM based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Camunda Platform seems to be the superior solution. Because users are divided over how easy IBM BPM is to deploy and because of its high price, users feel Camunda Platform is a better investment.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They really understand deeply and in detailed fashion the solution.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
The customer service is outstanding.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
On a scale from 1 to 10, support deserves a rating of 7 to 8.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
ECS and Fargate make horizontal scalability very easy.
They have that REST layer, REST APIs layer that makes it easy to integrate and make it part of a microservices ecosystem and APIs.
The solution has scalability issues; on a scale, I would rate it at eight out of ten.
The architecture of the solution offers scalability; we can scale both vertically and horizontally.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
We were not really concerned about the performance on the process itself because it was super simple, super straightforward, and it did not present itself as a bottleneck, nor did we feel it was adding additional time in the execution.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
Technologies evolve day by day, especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence and generative AI models.
There are negative aspects, such as IBM BPM being quite heavy and not lightweight, and the licensing cost is higher, which has caused some companies to shift away.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
Coordination across data silos is effective, and IBM BPM can be used for that purpose.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Camunda | 7.7% |
| IBM BPM | 4.1% |
| Other | 88.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 72 |
Camunda offers a process orchestration platform that automates and streamlines AI processes while integrating human tasks and diverse systems without sacrificing security, governance, or innovation.
Camunda empowers businesses and IT to collaborate effectively, addressing complexity, enhancing efficiency, and maintaining competitiveness at any speed or scale. Trusted by over 700 organizations including Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, it designs, orchestrates, automates, and improves critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. It is flexible and lightweight, easily integrating with APIs and microservices, while adhering to BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards for comprehensive process modeling and automation.
What are Camunda's standout features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Organizations use Camunda to automate business processes across industries like banking, logistics, telecommunications, and retail. It supports complex workflows such as loan approvals and integrates third-party applications. Known for managing tasks and process automation, it fits seamlessly with existing systems on-premise or in cloud environments like Azure and AWS.
IBM BPM enhances workflow efficiency with automation, integration, and a user-friendly interface, supporting reusable processes and robust analytics tools for streamlined business operations.
IBM BPM is a platform offering process automation and integration capabilities with a user-centric interface. Its design simplicity and low-code options support rapid development. The platform integrates seamlessly with other IBM products, creating a comprehensive automation suite. Its adaptability makes it easy to visualize and manage processes for efficient operations across diverse environments. IBM BPM is a reliable choice for those seeking to reduce complexity in development, enhance security, and improve scalability. However, improvements in integration, interface enhancements, and support for AI integration are desirable for an optimal experience.
What are the key features of IBM BPM?Organizations utilize IBM BPM to digitize workflows and automate tasks in sectors like insurance, banking, and logistics. It is effective for managing claims, opening accounts, and processing mortgage applications. The platform enables integration with legacy systems and platforms like MDM and ODM, ensuring comprehensive process management and seamless data flow across multiple applications. Companies find value in its capability to support quicker decision-making and operational efficiency.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
