No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Boomi iPaaS vs Magic xpi Integration Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (21st), AI Observability (24th)
Magic xpi Integration Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
32nd
Average Rating
3.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 6.6%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Magic xpi Integration Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Boomi iPaaS6.6%
Magic xpi Integration Platform1.1%
Other92.3%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

SG
Associate at Ltim
Cloud integration has transformed projects and delivers faster, more secure business workflows
In my opinion, the best feature Boomi iPaaS offers is its user interface, which is easy to maintain, has a low cost, and offers low licensing costs, making it very easy to develop any integration. Regarding features, Boomi iPaaS performs best and is more stable. It also has easy support, allowing me to contact the Boomi support vendor team for assistance with atoms, molecules, runtimes, and clusters. Security-wise, it is also more secure, enabling the use of internal OAuth 2.0 tokens and basic authentication for high-level authentication, and I can integrate with third-party services to obtain authentication, with some banking projects in Boomi iPaaS using PayU, Razorpay, and various payment platform authentications. The positive impact of Boomi iPaaS on my organization has been significant, as after adopting it, I received many projects with the help of the Boomi vendor who brought me opportunities for Boomi iPaaS usage. Previously, I used TIBCO, MFT, and WebMethods, which were all very old systems. Boomi iPaaS is cloud-based and continues to update constantly, which has been very useful and led to more business. I can definitely say I see specific positive outcomes after moving to Boomi iPaaS, noting improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and faster project delivery. The connector-based licensing cost is very low compared to other integration tools, and for security purposes, it is helpful. I have observed significant good performance transitioning from old legacy systems to Boomi iPaaS.
it_user977634 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise IT Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A low-performing integration tool
We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Boomi is a low code or no-code integration platform, which does exactly what it says, and it is fairly easy for a semi-technical user to configure and maintain it."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"It requires less development and has no learning curve, as it is easy to learn and implement."
"In terms of stability, it's working well, so it's been nice."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Dell is a very stable product."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The stability of the solution is OK."
 

Cons

"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time."
"It is not performing well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."
"The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
"It is an expensive platform."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Construction Company
26%
Printing Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates it is a little bit high but still reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In terms of improvements, there is not much to enhance, but I believe a more user-friendly UI, solid Agent Garden features, and more training initiatives to promote Boomi iPaaS would be beneficial....
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My main use case for Boomi iPaaS is integration, as I have been integrating Boomi iPaaS with many source and destination systems such as Salesforce. I use Boomi iPaaS as an integrator, connecting w...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Godrej Properties
Find out what your peers are saying about SnapLogic, Workato, Boomi and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: October 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.