Boomi iPaaS vs Magic xpi Integration Platform comparison

Boomi and Magic Software are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Boomi is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Magic Software is ranked #25. Boomi holds a 11.0% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Magic Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

1,774 Views
973 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Read 1 Magic xpi Integration Platform review

79 Views
31 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Magic xpi Integration Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

25th

Average Rating

3.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 11.0%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Magic xpi Integration Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

it_user977634

Enterprise IT Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A low-performing integration tool

We use it as an in-house back-type integration tool. It allows us to have different integrations between different systems It does not perform well. It needs more reusable components that are unlimited in time. Furthermore, it relies on the files systems and does not create components, so it is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."

"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."

"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."

"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."

"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

"I like the tool's optimization feature."

"The maturity of the product is significant."

"The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"The stability of the solution is OK."

Cons

"Documentation could be improved."

"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."

"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment."

"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."

"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."

"Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios."

"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"It is not performing well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive platform."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 24% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 52% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Magic xpi Integration Platform

Compared 48% of the time

More Magic xpi Integration Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

June 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download Magic xpi Integration Platform product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

Magic xpi Integration Platform is a total solution for integrating, automating and transforming the data of your business applications. The intuitive and easy-to-use interface, including 100+ pre-built connectors, makes it ideal for all types of users, from business users and citizen integrators to IT experts. Magic’s end-to-end tailored solutions are a great fit for all types of IT infrastructures, supporting all of the on-premise, cloud and hybrid integration needs of organizations around the world.

Magic Software

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Godrej Properties

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.