Boomi iPaaS vs Skyvia comparison

The compared Boomi and Skyvia solutions aren't in the same category. Boomi is ranked #3 in PaaS , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 8.0% mindshare in the category. Skyvia is ranked #26 in CDI , and holds a 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Skyvia users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 31 Boomi iPaaS reviews

4,780 Views
2,725 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Skyvia

Read 1 Skyvia review

1,113 Views
267 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

Skyvia

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Skyvia based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Boomi and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (18th), AI Observability (21st)

Skyvia

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (51st), Cloud Data Integration (26th)

Mindshare comparison

Boomi iPaaS and Skyvia aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 8.0%, down 9.4% compared to last year.
Skyvia, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Data Integration, holds 1.3% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Boomi iPaaS	8.0%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	6.7%
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps	6.0%
Other	79.3%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Cloud Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Skyvia	1.3%
AWS Glue	8.8%
AWS Database Migration Service	7.4%
Other	82.5%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Siddhardha G

Associate at Ltim

Cloud integration has transformed projects and delivers faster, more secure business workflows

In my opinion, the best feature Boomi iPaaS offers is its user interface, which is easy to maintain, has a low cost, and offers low licensing costs, making it very easy to develop any integration. Regarding features, Boomi iPaaS performs best and is more stable. It also has easy support, allowing me to contact the Boomi support vendor team for assistance with atoms, molecules, runtimes, and clusters. Security-wise, it is also more secure, enabling the use of internal OAuth 2.0 tokens and basic authentication for high-level authentication, and I can integrate with third-party services to obtain authentication, with some banking projects in Boomi iPaaS using PayU, Razorpay, and various payment platform authentications. The positive impact of Boomi iPaaS on my organization has been significant, as after adopting it, I received many projects with the help of the Boomi vendor who brought me opportunities for Boomi iPaaS usage. Previously, I used TIBCO, MFT, and WebMethods, which were all very old systems. Boomi iPaaS is cloud-based and continues to update constantly, which has been very useful and led to more business. I can definitely say I see specific positive outcomes after moving to Boomi iPaaS, noting improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and faster project delivery. The connector-based licensing cost is very low compared to other integration tools, and for security purposes, it is helpful. I have observed significant good performance transitioning from old legacy systems to Boomi iPaaS.

Read full review

Robert-Harris

CTO & Developer at a consultancy with self employed

The product works, is simple to use, and is reliable.

Error handling. This has caused me many problems in the past. When an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented. If I attempt a retry or opt not to display an error dialog, it does it anyway. In all fairness, I have never reported this. I think it is more important that a unique error code is passed to the error event that identifies a uniform type of error that occurred, such as ecDisconnect, eoInvalidField. It is very hard to find what any of the error codes currently passed actually mean. A list would be great for each database engine. Trying to catch an exception without displaying the UniDAC error message is impossible, no matter how you modify the parameters in the OnError of the TUniConnection object. I have already implemented the following things myself. They are suggestions rather than specific requests. Copy Datasets: This contains an abundance of redundant options. I think that a facility to copy one dataset to another in a single call would be handy. Redundancy: I am currently working on this. I have extended the TUniConnection to have an additional property called FallbackConnection. If the TUniConnection goes offline, the connection attempts to connect the FallbackConnection. If successful, it then sets the Connection properties of all live UniDatasets in the app to the FallbackConnection and re-opens them if necessary. The extended TUniConnection holds a list of datasets that were created. Each dataset is responsible for registering itself with the connection. This is a highly specific feature. It supports an offline mode that is found in mission critical/point of sale solutions. I have never seen it implement before in any DACs, but I think it is a really unique feature with a big impact. Dataset to JSON/XML: A ToSql function on a dataset that creates a full SQL Text statement with all parameters converted to text (excluding blobs) and included in the returned string. Extended TUniScript:- TMyUniScript allows me to add lines of text to a script using the normal dataset functions, Script.Append, Script.FieldByName(‘xxx’).AsString := ‘yyy’, Script.AddToScript and finally Script.Post, then Script.Commit. The AddToScript builds the SQL text statement and appends it to the script using #e above. Record Size Calculation. It would be great if UniDac could estimate the size of a particular record from a query or table. This could be used to automatically set the packet fetch/request count based on the size of the Ethernet packets on the local area network. This I believe would increase performance and reduce network traffic for returning larger datasets. I am aware that this would also be a unique feature to UniDac but would gain a massive performance enhancement. I would suggest setting the packet size on the TUniConnection which would effect all linked datasets.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For integrations, it is one of the best products available."

"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."

"Dell is a very stable product."

"Boomi iPaaS has significantly impacted our ROI. We have automated complete order-to-cash processes for multiple customers, saving over 90 million dollars."

"I have found the solution to be scalable."

"The ROI is that application integration is delivered much faster and efficiently than in a conventional approach, resulting in greatly reduced time-to-market for new initiatives and enabling organizations to innovate and differentiate in an ever growing competitive and changing market."

"It’s a good product and easy in terms of development."

"The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"For what it offers, I think this solution is a must for any Delphi programmer."

Cons

"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."

"I think data governance and data catalog are areas that Boomi iPaaS can focus on."

"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."

"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."

"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."

"There are stability issues."

"The IDE is lacking in the ability to script."

"The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Error handling has caused me many problems in the past; when an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"It is an expensive platform."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

23%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

I think data governance and data catalog are areas that Boomi iPaaS can focus on. Informatica has data catalog and data lineage functionalities, in addition to their ETL capabilities. Boomi iPaaS c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 7% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

Workato vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 5% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

SSIS vs Skyvia

Compared 40% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs Skyvia

Compared 17% of the time

Zapier vs Skyvia

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Skyvia

Compared 8% of the time

Coupler.io vs Skyvia

Compared 7% of the time

More Skyvia Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

March 2026

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

February 2026

Download Skyvia product report

Also Known As

Boomi

Skyvia, Skyvia Data Integration

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

Skyvia is a leading data integration and management platform designed to centralize data consolidation efforts for businesses, acting as a versatile tool for seamless data exchange across cloud apps and on-premises systems.

Skyvia integrates with a multitude of cloud services and databases, facilitating efficient data synchronization, replication, and backup. Users benefit from its intuitive wizard-driven interface which simplifies complex integration tasks without requiring extensive technical knowledge. This accessibility makes it ideal for IT professionals looking to streamline data handling.

What are Skyvia's most valuable features?

Data Integration: Simplifies cloud-to-cloud, cloud-to-ground, and ground-to-ground data connections without coding.
Data Backup: Ensures data safety by providing automated backups of essential information, enabling quick recovery.
Query Tool: Offers a powerful SQL editor for running ad-hoc queries and visualizing data with ease.
Data Synchronization: Keeps data up-to-date across platforms ensuring consistency and reliability.
Connectors: Extensive library of connectors catering to top cloud services and databases for flexibility.

Which benefits and ROI factors should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Users appreciate the intuitive setup and integration process requiring minimal technical input.
Cost-Effective: Offers competitive pricing aligning with budget-conscious strategies while delivering high value.
Scalability: Flexible solutions that scale with business growth, adapting to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on data handling tasks, allowing more focus on analytical and strategic initiatives.

Industries such as retail, healthcare, and finance implement Skyvia for seamless integration across multiple databases and cloud applications. Retail chains use it for consistent product data management across platforms, while healthcare providers employ it to consolidate patient data securely. Financial institutions leverage its robust data synchronization to maintain accurate financial records. Skyvia proves effective in enabling industry-specific solutions tailored to improve data accessibility and ensure integrity.

Skyvia

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Boomi and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.