No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is 2.5%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub2.5%
Broadcom Payment Security1.7%
Other95.8%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
Luis Inclan - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Fix4Fraud
A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface
The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this solution. In the next release, as an additional feature, it will be good to have the capability to sort and play visual effects in the fields. This will help to distinguish each record from the other. For example, we currently have a bar that shows if a person has a high or low score. If the score is 35%, the bar is considered low, and if the score moves to 99%, the bar increases. However, we don't have the capability as interface users to make this function appear in other fields where we want it displayed. We have only the score field, which is pre-configured with this functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"For a bank, we've seen transactions move to e-commerce. We needed a solution that would protect the bank and protect the bank's cardholders, and that's what this solution gives us."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"Let's put it this way, it's like going from Larder to a Ferrari."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
 

Cons

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"Unifying operational changes around highlighting. If you highlight one item, it will highlight the one card that's affected across the board."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.