No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs FICO Falcon Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FICO Falcon Platform
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FICO Falcon Platform is 2.7%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
FICO Falcon Platform2.7%
Broadcom Payment Security1.7%
Other95.6%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
reviewer2511618 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Anti-Fraud Strategy & System Solution Officer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real-time capability, consortium data model but offline analysis of transactions is not flexible
FICO users are business users, not developers. When setting up rules or parameters, some coding is required, and the learning curve is quite steep. This is a disadvantage of FICO. Additionally, the offline analysis of transactions is not flexible. Transactions need to be flagged as fraud to show up in the analysis, making it difficult to identify false negatives. The Identity Resolution Engine (IRE), an extension to FICO Falcon Platform, is helpful. However, integration with FICO Falcon Fraud Manager can be challenging due to its rigid template and data format requirements. This can cause delays in development and integration, potentially postponing projects by a month or two. AI is another thing they could improve is how they create the data model for my bank's detection data. From what I understand, they already have the capability to do that. But the data being processed in my bank, the ones they can process, is not really much. Maybe it's just a mistake on my part. But in terms of AI other than machine learning that they've already implemented, I have not seen any significant use case.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"It's the security and protection it offers our customers."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"The CA solution is a world-class product and others should consider using this solution."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"For a bank, we've seen transactions move to e-commerce. We needed a solution that would protect the bank and protect the bank's cardholders, and that's what this solution gives us."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"FICO is working on a local model specifically for Brazil, whereas tools from Oracle and other vendors are only developed for general use. I haven't seen any other vendors who think like that until now."
"It can make real-time decisions or real-time declines."
 

Cons

"The deployment process needs to be updated to ensure the base code does not involve details of other clients."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."
"When setting up rules or parameters, some coding is required, and the learning curve is quite steep."
"I've had bad experiences with FICO support. At the bank, we've faced critical problems where we only had minutes to find the solution, and it's hard to explain quickly. We contacted FICO, but they told us it was beyond their scope of support. They try to triage the call by asking us how much money we're losing, but I can't go into that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"The functionality is fine, but the price is getting more expensive."
"FICO is one of the best fraud detection platforms. However, a small bank might find it too expensive. In that case, I would agree it's probably not worth it. However, it's a no-brainer if your bank has 50 million accounts and 7 million credit card transactions daily."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
16%
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
37%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
Falcon Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. FICO Falcon Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.