CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs OmniPeek comparison

Broadcom and BlueCat are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 20% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

CA Application Delivery Ana...

Read 4 CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] reviews

20% willing to recommend

OmniPeek

Read 8 OmniPeek reviews

2,952 Views
1,387 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Application Delivery Ana...

OmniPeek

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and OmniPeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Application Delivery Ana...

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OmniPeek

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (38th), Network Monitoring Software (45th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1237194

Senior Solution Director, DevOps at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Good monitoring functionality, but technical support and integration with other products need to be improved

My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances. For CA Spectrum, the integration of this product is something that needs to be improved. Even some of their point products to not integrate very well, and ADA is one of them. The user interface needs to be improved. Technical support needs to be improved.

Read full review

AjayKumar19

Senior Software Engineer at Microchip Technology Inc.

Helps analyze network packets effectively and saves time for testers

I have utilized the packet capturing capabilities in OmniPeek. Using the Alpha sniffer and hardware-supported network devices, we can perform sniffer capturing for Wi-Fi wireless packets and router packets. The interface allows us to capture packets and observe connection establishment, data transfer, and the downloading and uploading of packets, such as TCP and UDP packets. The software works for both wireless and wired connections, including Ethernet. As a wireless test engineer in the wireless industry, the features of OmniPeek help me monitor network activity. While there are alternatives such as Wireshark, OmniPeek supports Windows and is particularly helpful for testers, especially for device certification validation. This software enables packet analysis to verify protocol compliance and identify issues. For developers, packet captures from OmniPeek assist in understanding and debugging issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."

"Technical support is excellent."

"Once it is setup and seeing traffic, it is an impressive tool to show potential problems long before the general users are complaining."

"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."

"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area, and I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."

"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."

"This is a good product; I would recommend and encourage people to use it because it has helped me a lot in the field."

"It's a solid piece of software. It's stable."

"OmniPeek shows the entire packet flow and structure, particularly in security-related scenarios, whereas Wireshark sometimes fails to capture all packets."

"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."

"OmniPeek's ability to convert application visibility into flow helps me quickly understand application performance over LAN, WAN, or wireless."

"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."

More OmniPeek pros

Cons

"Upgrades can be quite complex."

"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."

"Hard to setup right, hard to get the conversations right."

"The user interface needs improvement."

"It is not the best product on the market, but it is better than the competition if you were comparing prices."

"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

"OmniPeek doesn't support Linux or Unix installations, which prompted the shift to Wireshark."

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

"The solution's automation has room for improvement."

"Sometimes setting up the filters for the product is difficult, and I can't quickly sharpen them from the home screen."

"OmniPeek needs to improve its performance level."

"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do. The automation should be more user-friendly. I have exposed some APIs but the usage is not user-friendly."

"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do."

More OmniPeek cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."

"There are different types of licenses available."

"We have only purchased the add-on once and have not paid for any subsequent versions as it was too costly for us."

"The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OmniPeek?

There isn't anything specific that needs improvement in OmniPeek, as it performs better than Wireshark for our requirements. However, OmniPeek could benefit from supporting different platforms. Pla...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OmniPeek?

I have been working with the OmniPeek product for almost two years at the start of my career, primarily using it for wireless 802.11 Wi-Fi packets, sniffer, and analysis. My experience with OmniPee...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OmniPeek?

I didn't explore much about OmniPeek beyond its basic features. OmniPeek is user-friendly and easy to start working with, especially on the Windows platform. For beginners, it is very easy to handl...

See all answers

Comparisons

LinkSprinter vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

ExtremeManagement vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Competitors

TruView vs OmniPeek

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

Colasoft Capsa vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs OmniPeek

Compared 5% of the time

More OmniPeek Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] report

Download CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek

April 2026

Download OmniPeek product report

Also Known As

CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent

Savvius OmniPeek

Overview

CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

Broadcom

OmniPeek enables effective network monitoring by offering packet capturing capabilities for Wi-Fi and routers, providing insights crucial for maintaining network performance and troubleshooting issues.

OmniPeek serves as a pivotal tool for wireless packet analysis, assisting teams with capturing and analyzing Wi-Fi 802.11 packets across standards. It aids in testing WLAN protocols and provides application performance and security analytics, supporting network issue monitoring, protocol analysis, and troubleshooting both on-premises and cloud applications. Real-time analytics integration with LiveNX and expert view functionalities make it a preferred choice for user-friendly network operation, although improvements in platform support, automation, and guidance are sought by users.

What are OmniPeek's key features?

Packet Capturing: Efficiently captures Wi-Fi and router packets for robust network analysis.
Channel-Based Sniffing: Monitors DFS and non-DFS transitions, vital for network stability.
Real-Time Analytics: Integrates with LiveNX for live data insights.
Custom Color Coding: Enhances packet visibility for easier analysis.
Expert View: Offers in-depth troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple interface enhances usability and efficiency.
Protocol Compliance: Verifies protocols for reliable network operations.
Application Performance Monitoring: Ensures optimal application functionality.
Voice Quality Checks: Maintains high communication standards.

OmniPeek is implemented across sectors that require precise wireless packet analysis. It's crucial for testing WLAN protocols, validating IP blocks, and ensuring network performance during enterprise-level authentications and internet egress, offering organizations user-friendly solutions for comprehensive WLAN monitoring.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

ERGO

Apcon, Aruba Networks, Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Ekahau, Gigamon Systems, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros, Ralink Technology Corporation, Telchemy

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.