No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Calabrio ONE vs Deepgram comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Calabrio ONE
Ranking in AI Scheduling & Coordination
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Workforce Engagement Management (3rd), AI Customer Experience Personalization (3rd)
Deepgram
Ranking in AI Scheduling & Coordination
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Text-To-Speech Services (2nd), Speech-To-Text Services (1st), AI Customer Support (10th), AI Sales & Marketing (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the AI Scheduling & Coordination category, the mindshare of Calabrio ONE is 4.9%. The mindshare of Deepgram is 4.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Scheduling & Coordination Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Calabrio ONE4.9%
Deepgram4.4%
Other90.7%
AI Scheduling & Coordination
 

Featured Reviews

Jaleelakadheer Mohideen - PeerSpot reviewer
Operation Planning Associate at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Improved agent adherence and scheduling have boosted satisfaction but reporting still needs real time
In terms of improvements for Calabrio ONE, since I do not work with forecasting, I think we could collaborate AWS with Calabrio ONE to get live data fed into Calabrio ONE, which would be even greater for forecasting. We pull the majority of our reports through Calabrio ONE, and something I have noticed is that for the intraday report, if we want to pull data at 12:30, we have to wait until 12:45. It is a 15-minute refresher window, which is lagging behind. This delay is the same for any report being pulled. I do not have a grand overview of forecasting, but it generally takes a long time, and my agents have not been able to collaborate AWS with Calabrio ONE in the forecasting aspect. Apart from that, everything else is working great on Calabrio ONE. I would love it if it was more real-time and if I could download the data almost immediately without waiting for that 15-minute buffer. I rate Calabrio ONE a seven because I feel it could be improved. As I mentioned, the 15-minute buffer is an issue, and the real-time feeding into forecasting could be better. If we could control Shift Bags within Calabrio ONE instead of using another application like Teleopti to manage Shift Bags or control overall shifts, that would be even better. Right now, we use a combination of Teleopti and Calabrio ONE to decide the Shift Bags. The quantity and quality of results provided by Calabrio ONE are accurate 95 percent of the time. The forecasting feature in the application might not be the most accurate, which is an area where we do have issues, especially when scheduling breaks at intervals where calls might be at a higher volume. Those are rigged. Apart from that, since breaks and other meetings get allotted automatically, we do have to manually move them around because that forecasting is not accurate. If that could be improved, it would be great.
Arunkumar HG - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Architect & Hands-On Leader | Prototyping, Automation, AI/LLM Integration | 20+ Years in at Regalix
A Powerful, Adaptable, and Constantly Evolving STT Solution for Voice Automation
Honestly, Deepgram has been exceptionally proactive in addressing the primary area that needed improvement. My main challenge was with the real-time detection of when a user has finished speaking in a live conversation, which is critical for a responsive voice bot. They directly solved this by releasing their Flux model. Because Flux is a recent release, I haven't yet had enough time to thoroughly test it and identify new limitations. At this stage, any "improvement" would be more of a "nice-to-have" feature rather than a fix for an existing problem. The core service is already very robust and meets all of our current needs. What additional features should be included in the next release? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Looking toward the future, here are a few features that could add even more value to an already excellent platform: * Advanced Built-in Analytics: While I can get the raw transcript and build my own analytics pipeline, it would be powerful to have features like sentiment analysis, emotion detection, or automatic summarization offered directly through the API. This would save significant development time. * More Granular Speaker Diarization: For calls with multiple participants, enhancing the real-time speaker diarization (labeling who is speaking) to be even more precise would be a fantastic addition for creating detailed call analyses. * Tighter Integration with TTS: Since Deepgram is also expanding into Text-to-Speech (TTS), offering a more seamlessly integrated STT-to-TTS pipeline could simplify the development stack for creating voice agents from start to finish. * Specialized, Pre-Trained Industry Models: While the general models are highly accurate, offering even more specialized, pre-trained models for specific industries like finance, healthcare, or legal-which are heavy on specific jargon-could push the accuracy even higher for those niche use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are able to address compliance issues more quickly."
"Calabrio ONE impacted my organization positively by making it really easy to keep track of each and everything, such as PTO quotas, AHT, volume, adherence, and agent performances, so it was just really easy to capture all the details and see what the trends are, how the data is behaving, and it helped the organization gain a gold standard in our yearly reviews."
"The UI is slick."
"I have used many tools such as Verint, IEX, and Avaya, but I saw that Calabrio ONE was far better than other tools."
"I was able to use Calabrio to provide data and analytics in a visually stimulating fashion which captured my audience's understanding with ease."
"Calabrio WFM offers great insights on scheduling; what I like about the program the most is the coverage tray as this allows us to see our staffing deficits, shrinkage, and the reforecasting of our calls, helping us make real-time decisions while taking into account how it will affect staffing."
"Calabrio ONE definitely impacts our organization positively by being more efficient for us on the workforce management side."
"The Copy Schedule Activities has been a favorite tool. It reduces time spent when I need to make changes which are identical to multiple agents' schedules."
"Deepgram's transcription stands out compared to other solutions primarily due to its speed and accuracy; those are important points for me because not all providers or tools handled Spanish well, but Deepgram adjusted perfectly for that use case, and we also chose 11Labs voice, a South American voice, which worked very well with Deepgram."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its speed of transcription, as it is one of the fastest tools, especially if you compare it to the second fastest solution that you can get, which is 20 times faster, so it is not just a marginally faster product."
"Deepgram is able to handle large volumes of audio data without compromising accuracy."
"Deepgram's low latency transcription has greatly impacted my ability to deliver reliable voice agents and provided very good transcription."
"The features that I have been using in the tool have been very stable."
"The solution's Speech-to-Text conversion feature is really awesome."
"The most valuable capabilities of Deepgram that I've found so far include low latency, as it offers less than 200 milliseconds, which is not provided by any other text-to-speech models."
"The speed of the solution for transcribing videos is good."
 

Cons

"We have encountered stability issues. We had about six months where the program was crashing weekly."
"The pain point I experienced with Calabrio ONE was with the PTO quotas, as I did not have the option to import the Excel files, meaning if I had 100 agents or 150 agents, I had to manually update the PTO quotas in the system, and if there would have been an option to import the PTO quota files in the same format, that would have been easy."
"Sometimes we get glitches in Calabrio ONE because the application gets closed or minimized automatically."
"A few of the features were "nice to have" features, but version 9.3 had some "deficiencies"."
"We have encountered plenty of deployment issues."
"The only thing I would say for improvement in Calabrio ONE is the meetings feature that we talked about. Sometimes it doesn't schedule everyone even though there are blocks available, and I'm not sure if it's due to staffing constraints or if the tool just doesn't take into account that it could move breaks a little bit."
"Gamification: We need help developing it, and what is currently shown is not enough."
"Try and correct bugs prior to release."
"Even though Deepgram has many customization options, I wish that Deepgram had voice cloning customization to a much larger extent."
"We've had issues in the past where it generates the transcript, and a lot of the text is duplicated."
"The traditional Speech-to-Text doesn't understand when the user is done speaking in bot conversations."
"In comparison to Deepgram, I would say that the transcript accuracy offered by other products is much higher."
"I would like it to be more accurate."
"The solution does not properly identify the number of speakers."
"We haven't seen a return on investment with Deepgram so far; we have been building POCs for the last two years but recently switched to AWS in the last two months due to scalability issues with the pay-as-you-go model."
"I would not recommend Deepgram to other users because it does not properly identify video communication."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Deepgram is a cheap solution."
"When using Deepgram, one needs to pay for the hours or minutes for which the transcription is needed."
"The pricing is moderate."
"The solution’s pricing is cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Scheduling & Coordination solutions are best for your needs.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Outsourcing Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
7%
Construction Company
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise38
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Calabrio ONE?
I do not know about that because my company provided it to me. I do not know about the costing of Calabrio ONE, the licensing, or the setup costs because my organization provided it. I did not hand...
What needs improvement with Calabrio ONE?
The only thing I would say for improvement in Calabrio ONE is the meetings feature that we talked about. Sometimes it doesn't schedule everyone even though there are blocks available, and I'm not s...
What is your primary use case for Calabrio ONE?
My team as a whole uses Calabrio ONE for forecasting, reporting, and scheduling. In my actual role, my day-to-day usage is more focused on scheduling and tools like Intraday Adherence for monitorin...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deepgram?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is seamless and customizable as needed. Currently, we use the growth plan. For enterprise, they offer a higher tier, so it is c...
What needs improvement with Deepgram?
Deepgram has a vast UI and a vast range of models, but there could be a simpler version for creating AI agents rather than providing a full-fledged platform for minimal use cases. It could be multi...
What is your primary use case for Deepgram?
My main use case for Deepgram is creating voice agents to automate the customer support part and reply to FAQs and customer queries. Deepgram has multiple models, speech to text and text to speech ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Calabrio
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Polaris, Equifax, Fedex, Rabo, Paychex, Virteva, VITAS Healthcare Corp, Keurig Green Mountain, AT&T, Esurance, Subaru, Boeing, Tiffany & Co., Thomson Reuters.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Calabrio ONE vs. Deepgram and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.