Camunda vs Newgen OmniFlow comparison

Camunda and Newgen are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Newgen is ranked #34. Camunda holds a 9.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Newgen’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Newgen users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
13,354 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Newgen OmniFlow

Read 8 Newgen OmniFlow reviews

1,023 Views
992 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

Newgen OmniFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Newgen OmniFlow and Camunda are competing products in the business process management arena. While Newgen OmniFlow is favored for its pricing and customer support, Camunda stands out with its feature-rich offering, appealing to tech-savvy teams.

Features: Newgen OmniFlow is known for its comprehensive process automation, strong document management, and easy integration with third-party apps. It also offers a user-friendly interface with low-code/no-code designer tools and excellent integration capabilities. Camunda, on the other hand, is recognized for its open-source platform, rich developer tools, and adaptability to various programming languages. Its lightweight architecture, wide BPMN standard coverage, and advanced REST API features are particularly valuable.

Room for Improvement: Newgen OmniFlow could benefit from enhancing its process customization options, improving documentation for new users, and expanding support for community-driven innovations. Camunda can improve by simplifying its deployment process, expanding customer service beyond community forums, and offering more intuitive tools for non-developer users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Newgen OmniFlow has a straightforward deployment process guided by a responsive customer service team, beneficial for organizations new to BPM. Camunda's setup, while more involved due to its flexible, developer-focus, is balanced by an active online community and comprehensive documentation resources.

Pricing and ROI: Newgen OmniFlow's affordability and quick ROI are appealing for those with budget constraints. It offers lower setup costs, making it attractive for small to mid-sized enterprises. Camunda, however, justifies its higher cost with feature depth, offering significant long-term ROI for organizations prepared to invest in customization and development.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (51st), AI IT Support (5th)

Newgen OmniFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

34th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 9.3%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Newgen OmniFlow is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.3%
Newgen OmniFlow	0.9%
Other	89.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Chhavi Datta

Senior Manager at Infoedge India Ltd.,

Enabled us to consolidate workflows and reduce time spent searching for transactions

We have consolidated the workflow and have certain elements and functionalities developed in the new system so that my agents who are using the application don't have to do manual tasks searching for mail. So, we've consolidated and arranged some alerts and have done some segregation. The user is benefited, and the time spent on searching a transaction is reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."

"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."

"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."

"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."

More Camunda pros

"They are a good team that is proactive, and they are trying to accommodate all of our requirements."

"The most valuable feature for us is the Omnicon. That made sense for us because our company is now able to capture information from documents."

"Newgen will structure the system based on all the requirements of the business. We can design the forms as complex forms or make our own versions to fix what's wrong."

"The most valuable features of Newgen OmniFlow are the user interface, the low-code no-code designer tools, and the integration models are important."

"The UI is easy. It's not very code based, so you can make certain changes on your end."

"The integration capabilities of Newgen OmniFlow are excellent due to its ready APIs, enabling easy API creation for consumption across different systems."

"It is working fine so far. I haven't heard anything bad about it from the applications team that is using it, so I assume that it is doing okay."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility in using it."

Cons

"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."

"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."

"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."

"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

More Camunda cons

"Improvement is needed in supporting the partner ecosystem."

"I would like to see more automated analytics built into the solution."

"Newgen OmniFlow could improve by having more out-of-the-box integration modules. It would be beneficial to have an analytics model that is not currently present."

"The development teams should be more agile and they need to have more team members."

"We had consistent issues of Newgen OmniFlow crashing. It's not compatible with bounce browsers like Chrome."

"There should be some reporting and dashboarding capabilities. I don't see such capabilities built into it. Sometimes, the leadership wants to understand the business cases that we want to automate. We face a lot of challenges to justify why we are using Newgen, and we need a way to present that to the leadership. If there is something out of the box and if we can get meaningful dashboards and reporting capabilities, it would be helpful."

"At the system level, I would like to see things be much more flexible, especially for different document templates and introducing changes."

"In terms of stability, like every product it has its issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"Camunda is much cheaper."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"Overall, this solution is very cost effective when compared to other solutions in the market."

"Its price is a bit on the high side, but that's okay. From a company perspective, it is reasonable."

"The on-prem solution is affordable. The cloud solution is more expensive. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees."

"The price of Newgen OmniFlow is priced reasonably."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

10%

Import And Exporter

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Newgen OmniFlow?

The pricing of Newgen OmniFlow is fair. That said, there is a need for standardization in pricing, rather than leaving it to the discretion of the salespeople.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Newgen OmniFlow?

Improvement is needed in supporting the partner ecosystem.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Newgen OmniFlow?

Customers use Newgen OmniFlow for its ease of deployment, ease of use, ease of integrations, and efficiency improvement in terms of process automation. It is agile in terms of deployment to customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Pega Platform vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 13% of the time

IBM BPM vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 13% of the time

Bonita vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 9% of the time

ServoStreams vs Newgen OmniFlow

Compared 9% of the time

More Newgen OmniFlow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Newgen OmniFlow

January 2026

Download Newgen OmniFlow product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

OmniFlow

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Newgen

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Platform-independent, scalable Business Process Management solution that enables automation of organizational business processes. It has seamless integration abilities allowing it to be introduced into any IT infrastructure. OmniFlow is designed to ease the creation, deployment, modification and management of Business Processes with no programming effort and differentiates with other Business Process Management products through its ability to deploy rapidly to automate a complete process.

Newgen

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Rak Bank, Bank Dhofar

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Newgen OmniFlow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.