Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs Checkmarx One comparison

The compared CAST and Checkmarx solutions aren't in the same category. CAST is ranked #3 in SDA , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 7.6% mindshare in the category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 in AS , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of CAST users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.
CAST Application Intelligen...
Read 4 CAST Application Intelligence Platform reviews
  • 1,037 Views
  • 674 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Checkmarx One
Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 17,957 Views
  • 13,468 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CAST Application Intelligen...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Software Development Analytics (3rd)
Checkmarx One
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CAST Application Intelligence Platform is designed for Software Development Analytics and holds a mindshare of 7.6%, down 9.2% compared to last year.
Checkmarx One, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 10.2% mindshare, down 11.8% since last year.
Software Development Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CAST Application Intelligence Platform7.6%
SonarQube42.1%
Snyk32.8%
Other17.5%
Software Development Analytics
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Checkmarx One10.2%
SonarQube17.9%
Snyk5.7%
Other66.2%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2315901 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2315901
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Helps identify and correct software flaws effectively
CAST AIP supports software process improvement by providing insights into code quality, security, and architecture, aiding in the enhancement of development processes. CAST AIP helps identify and correct software flaws and it is one of the main strengths of the solution. The automated code review process in CAST AIP is beneficial and can contribute to the digital transformation of IT shops. Integrating AIP with existing development tools and ecosystems is challenging but beneficial. With proper support and technical assistance, the process becomes smoother. I would recommend CAST AIP for organizations with well-established and clear software processes. However, for organizations with complex or less-defined processes, it may not be the best fit. Overall, I would rate CAST AIP as a seven out of ten.
Read full review
Shahzad Shahzad - PeerSpot reviewer
Shahzad Shahzad
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance
Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is its security dashboard which is a dedicated dashboard that's pretty helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry, such as ISO 5055, OWASP, CWE Top 25, and NIST security guidelines. I find the security dashboard of the solution and the information it provides pretty useful. The security dashboard of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a feature that stands out."
"CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platform."
"It supports most programming languages."
"Our clients use CAST Highlight for cloud migration. This allows them to remove or remediate the blockers which are highlighted. This part of the solution shows improvement in quality and captures feedback for our clients."
"Used for controlling the technical debt and code quality."
"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization because in the past, when Checkmarx One scan was not implemented, we faced a lot of issues finding vulnerabilities inside the repository, but now, since we have integrated Checkmarx One into our repository, we can smoothly and very easily find vulnerabilities and manage those effectively."
"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization by providing resolution strategies and indicating which vulnerabilities need to be fixed."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
More Checkmarx One pros
 

Cons

"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code."
"It has very few plugins to access different code repositories, so source code has to be fed."
"The integration of this solution could be improved."
"Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering issues."
"Implementation could be made more simpler as it is complex."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"Checkmarx One can be improved by reducing noise and improving false positive filtering."
"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
More Checkmarx One cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do know how the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is licensed, but I'm not able to give the cost because the price is not listed. My company works with individual vendors, so pricing is on a case-to-case basis, but the vendors give specialized pricing because of the enterprise deployment, though my team is aware of product pricing based on lines of code, based on the number of applications, etc., I'm unable to give the exact licensing costs of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. My company doesn't have to pay extra for some features or services because all are included as part of the enterprise license. On a scale of one to five, with five being very cheap and one being very expensive, I would rate the CAST Application Intelligence Platform as three out of five."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."
"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."
"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."
"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."
More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Development Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise46
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platfor...
See all answers
What needs improvement with CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering iss...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
CAST AIP is a valuable solution for quality metrics and application security. It is beneficial for software architecture detection.
See all answers
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 50% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 7% of the time
BlueOptima vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
BlueOptima vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 7% of the time
More CAST Application Intelligence Platform Competitors
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One
Compared 48% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 5% of the time
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One Logo
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 3% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One Logo
OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One
Compared 2% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube
December 2025
CAST Application Intelligence Platform reportDownload CAST Application Intelligence Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
January 2026
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
 

Also Known As

CAST AIP
No data available
 

Overview

CAST Application Intelligence Platform (AIP), a result of over $130M in R&D investment over two decades, is an enterprise-grade software measurement and quality analysis solution designed to analyze multi-tiered, multi-technology applications for technical vulnerabilities and adherence to architectural and coding standards and then provide business relevant information to the IT organization through various dashboards and products built with end users in mind.

  • Application Analytics Dashboard (CAST AAD): Provides IT executives with accurate business relevant analytics to drive their organization
  • Application Engineering Dashboard (CAST AED): Provides engineering and QA teams with powerful code and system level structural flaw insight and remediation guidance
  • Enlighten: Delivers to developers a powerful deep understanding of their application’s structure
  • Architecture Checker: Gives architects a reliable, automated solution to enforce architectures that deliver stability and performance of their critical applications

CAST’s underlying system-level analysis technology assesses both the health of an application, as measured through numerous health factors, as well as specific structural and system-level defects that drive performance and stability issues providing true system level analysis.

CAST

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx
 

Sample Customers

Steria, T-Systems MMS, Atos Origin, Accenture, Capgemini
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

We monitor all Software Development Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.