No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs Checkmarx One comparison

The compared CAST and Checkmarx solutions aren't in the same category. CAST is ranked #7 in SDA , and holds a 6.6% mindshare in the category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 in AS , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of CAST users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.
CAST Application Intelligen...
Read 4 CAST Application Intelligence Platform reviews
  • 1,416 Views
  • 850 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Checkmarx One
Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 27,512 Views
  • 15,682 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CAST Application Intelligence Platform and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Snyk, Allstacks and others in Software Development Analytics.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Software Development Analytics Report (Updated: July 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Software Development Analytics
July 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CAST Application Intelligen...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Software Development Analytics (7th)
Checkmarx One
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (11th), Container Security (13th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CAST Application Intelligence Platform is designed for Software Development Analytics and holds a mindshare of 6.6%, down 10.7% compared to last year.
Checkmarx One, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 8.0% mindshare, down 10.3% since last year.
Software Development Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CAST Application Intelligence Platform6.6%
SonarQube33.6%
Snyk26.6%
Other33.19999999999999%
Software Development Analytics
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Checkmarx One8.0%
SonarQube11.8%
Snyk5.1%
Other75.1%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Vishal-Goyal - PeerSpot reviewer
Vishal-Goyal
Chief Architect at Persistent Systems
Has a security dashboard that's helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry
The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code.
Read full review
Shahzad Shahzad - PeerSpot reviewer
Shahzad Shahzad
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance
Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It supports most programming languages."
"CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platform."
"Our clients use CAST Highlight for cloud migration. This allows them to remove or remediate the blockers which are highlighted. This part of the solution shows improvement in quality and captures feedback for our clients."
"Used for controlling the technical debt and code quality."
"We've seen ROI from CAST Application Intelligence Platform because we've been able to leverage it for doing multiple customer engagements and we've been able to win more business for our organization by leveraging the product."
"Hourly, daily, and monthly static code analysis before making a project live, therefore controlling the technical debt and code quality."
"The most valuable feature of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is its security dashboard which is a dedicated dashboard that's pretty helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry, such as ISO 5055, OWASP, CWE Top 25, and NIST security guidelines. I find the security dashboard of the solution and the information it provides pretty useful. The security dashboard of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a feature that stands out."
"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things, and it also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."
"It is very easy to insert the tool in the SDLC because there are a wide variety of ways to access the source-code, initiate scans, and review the results."
"Checkmarx offers many valuable features, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Infrastructure as Code (IAC), Supply Chain Security, and API Security."
"The user interface is modern and nice to use."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms, its ease of use is another good feature, and it also supports most of the languages."
More Checkmarx One pros
 

Cons

"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all."
"Implementation could be made more simpler as it is complex."
"It has very few plugins to access different code repositories, so source code has to be fed."
"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code."
"The integration of this solution could be improved."
"Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering issues."
"The validation process needs to be sped up."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."
"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"Checkmarx One can be improved by reducing noise and improving false positive filtering."
"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."
"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."
More Checkmarx One cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do know how the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is licensed, but I'm not able to give the cost because the price is not listed. My company works with individual vendors, so pricing is on a case-to-case basis, but the vendors give specialized pricing because of the enterprise deployment, though my team is aware of product pricing based on lines of code, based on the number of applications, etc., I'm unable to give the exact licensing costs of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. My company doesn't have to pay extra for some features or services because all are included as part of the enterprise license. On a scale of one to five, with five being very cheap and one being very expensive, I would rate the CAST Application Intelligence Platform as three out of five."
"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."
"It is a good product but a little overpriced."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."
"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."
"It is an expensive solution."
"It's relatively expensive."
"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."
"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."
More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Development Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Government
9%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise46
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?
According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 31% of the time
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Seerene vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Seerene vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 7% of the time
More CAST Application Intelligence Platform Competitors
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One
Compared 26% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 3% of the time
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One Logo
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One
Compared 2% of the time
Snyk vs Checkmarx One Logo
Snyk vs Checkmarx One
Compared 2% of the time
Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One Logo
Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One
Compared 2% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Software Development Analytics
July 2026
CAST Application Intelligence Platform reportDownload CAST Application Intelligence Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
August 2026
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
 

Also Known As

CAST AIP
No data available
 

Overview

CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a leading software analysis and measurement system designed to support advanced IT strategies. It provides comprehensive insights into software structure, performance, and security, aiding developers and IT leaders in effective decision-making.

CAST Application Intelligence Platform offers a robust solution for understanding complex software ecosystems. By automating application analytics, it accelerates the identification of software issues, reducing the technical debt and improving code quality. The platform is particularly useful for legacy system modernization, cloud migration initiatives, and enhancing application stability and scalability.

What are the key features of CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
  • Automated Analysis: Provides deep insights without manual intervention.
  • Code Quality Assessment: Enhances code reliability and security.
  • Technical Debt Measurement: Identifies and reduces associated costs.
  • Cloud Readiness: Evaluates applications for seamless cloud transition.
What benefits should be considered in reviews?
  • Improved Developer Efficiency: Boosts productivity through automated workflows.
  • Cost Reduction: Minimizes expenses related to software maintenance.
  • Risk Mitigation: Reduces vulnerabilities with insightful security assessments.
  • Enhanced Decision Making: Supports strategic IT planning with precise data.

CAST Application Intelligence Platform is heavily utilized in industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where software quality and security are critical. Implementing its solutions allows these sectors to modernize legacy systems, ensuring compliance and streamlining operations through reliable software architecture evaluation.

CAST

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?
  • Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
  • Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
  • Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
  • Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
  • Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.
What benefits should users expect in reviews?
  • Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
  • Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
  • Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
  • Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx
 

Sample Customers

Steria, T-Systems MMS, Atos Origin, Accenture, Capgemini
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Buyer's Guide
Software Development Analytics
July 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Snyk, Allstacks and others in Software Development Analytics. Updated: July 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Software Development Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.