CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

The compared CAST and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. CAST is ranked #6 in SDA , and holds a 6.9% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #12 in AS , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of CAST users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CAST Application Intelligen...

Read 4 CAST Application Intelligence Platform reviews

1,279 Views
793 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 64 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

8,536 Views
6,231 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CAST Application Intelligen...

OpenText Core Application S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CAST Application Intelligence Platform and OpenText Core Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Snyk, Jellyfish and others in Software Development Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CAST Application Intelligen...

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Development Analytics (6th)

OpenText Core Application S...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CAST Application Intelligence Platform is designed for Software Development Analytics and holds a mindshare of 6.9%, down 10.7% compared to last year.
OpenText Core Application Security, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 3.1% mindshare, down 4.4% since last year.

Software Development Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CAST Application Intelligence Platform	6.9%
SonarQube	36.1%
Snyk	28.6%
Other	28.400000000000006%

Software Development Analytics

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Application Security	3.1%
SonarQube	13.6%
Checkmarx One	8.8%
Other	74.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Vishal-Goyal

Chief Architect at Peristent Systems

Has a security dashboard that's helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry

The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code.

Read full review

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our clients use CAST Highlight for cloud migration. This allows them to remove or remediate the blockers which are highlighted. This part of the solution shows improvement in quality and captures feedback for our clients."

"Used for controlling the technical debt and code quality."

"The most valuable feature of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is its security dashboard which is a dedicated dashboard that's pretty helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry, such as ISO 5055, OWASP, CWE Top 25, and NIST security guidelines. I find the security dashboard of the solution and the information it provides pretty useful. The security dashboard of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a feature that stands out."

"Our clients use CAST Highlight for cloud migration, which allows them to remove or remediate the blockers that are highlighted, shows improvement in quality, and captures feedback for our clients."

"Hourly, daily, and monthly static code analysis before making a project live, therefore controlling the technical debt and code quality."

"CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platform."

"We've seen ROI from CAST Application Intelligence Platform because we've been able to leverage it for doing multiple customer engagements and we've been able to win more business for our organization by leveraging the product."

"It supports most programming languages."

"This identification provides us an advantage in that the service itself works to stay abreast and knowledgeable about emerging threats."

"Micro Focus WebInspect and Fortify code analysis tools are fully integrated with SSC portals and can instantly register to error tracking systems, like TFS and JIRA."

"It is an extremely robust, scalable, and stable solution."

"Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good."

"Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions."

"Each bank may have its own core banking applications with proprietary support for different programming languages. This makes Fortify particularly relevant and advantageous in those cases."

"I would definitely recommend Micro Focus Fortify any day for clients who are looking for a good security solution."

"The solution is very fast."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

Cons

"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all."

"Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering issues."

"Implementation could be made simpler as it is complex."

"It has very few plugins to access different code repositories, so source code has to be fed."

"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code."

"The integration of this solution could be improved."

"Implementation could be made more simpler as it is complex."

"The thing that could be improved is reducing the cost of usage and including some of the most pricey features, such as dynamic analysis and that sort of functionality, which makes the difference between different types of tools."

"The biggest deficiency is the integration with bug tracker systems. It might be better if the configuration screen presented for accessing the bug tracking systems could provide some flexibility."

"It would be useful if they could integrate secure design reviews, security user stories in Fortify on Demand Portal, and also look for possible options to get just one view of risks for given services (Covering Application, Infrastructure, Pen. Test, etc.)."

"In terms of what could be improved, we need more strategic analysis reports, not just for one specific application, but for the whole enterprise. In the next release, we need more reports and more analytic views for all the applications. There is no enterprise view in Fortify. I would like enterprise views and reports."

"We want a user-based control and role-based access for developers. We want to give limited access to developers so that it only pertains to the code that they write and scanning of the codes for any vulnerabilities as they're progressing with writing the code. As of now, the interface to give restricted access to the developers is not the best. It gives them more access than what is basically required, but we don't want over-provisioning and over-access."

"It could have a little bit more streamlined installation procedure. Based on the things that I've done, it could also be a bit more automated. It is kind of taking a bunch of different scanners, and SSC is just kind of managing the results. The scanning doesn't really seem to be fully integrated into the SSC platform. More automation and any kind of integration in the SSC platform would definitely be good. There could be a way to initiate scans from SSC and more functionality on the server-side to initiate desk scans if it is not already available."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand could improve the reports. They could benefit from being more user-friendly and intuitive."

"It lacks of some important features that the competitors have, such as Software Composition Analysis, full dead code detection, and Agile Alliance's Best Practices and Technical Debt."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do know how the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is licensed, but I'm not able to give the cost because the price is not listed. My company works with individual vendors, so pricing is on a case-to-case basis, but the vendors give specialized pricing because of the enterprise deployment, though my team is aware of product pricing based on lines of code, based on the number of applications, etc., I'm unable to give the exact licensing costs of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. My company doesn't have to pay extra for some features or services because all are included as part of the enterprise license. On a scale of one to five, with five being very cheap and one being very expensive, I would rate the CAST Application Intelligence Platform as three out of five."

"It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."

"Despite being on the higher end in terms of cost, the biggest value lies in its abilities, including robust features, seamless integration, and high-quality findings."

"If I exceed one million lines of code, there might be an extra cost or a change in the pricing bracket."

"Buying a license would be feasible for regular use. For intermittent use, the cloud-based option can be used (Fortify on Demand)."

"Fortify on Demand is affordable, and its licensing comes with a year of support."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"I believe the rental license is not too expensive, but it provides a lot of information about the vulnerabilities."

"Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but I am very happy with what they're able to provide."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Development Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

Areas for improvement should be contextualized post the OpenText acquisition, but back when I was working with Micro Focus, they focused heavily on enterprise-centric solutions. Now, after the acqu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

For OpenText Core Application Security, I currently support a couple of my clients who are using Fortify on Demand for their web application, CRM, and sales platform. Many good features of Fortify ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform

Compared 34% of the time

Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Seerene vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More CAST Application Intelligence Platform Competitors

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 19% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube

April 2026

CAST Application Intelligence Platform report

Download CAST Application Intelligence Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

April 2026

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Also Known As

CAST AIP

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Overview

CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a leading software analysis and measurement system designed to support advanced IT strategies. It provides comprehensive insights into software structure, performance, and security, aiding developers and IT leaders in effective decision-making.

CAST Application Intelligence Platform offers a robust solution for understanding complex software ecosystems. By automating application analytics, it accelerates the identification of software issues, reducing the technical debt and improving code quality. The platform is particularly useful for legacy system modernization, cloud migration initiatives, and enhancing application stability and scalability.

What are the key features of CAST Application Intelligence Platform?

Automated Analysis: Provides deep insights without manual intervention.
Code Quality Assessment: Enhances code reliability and security.
Technical Debt Measurement: Identifies and reduces associated costs.
Cloud Readiness: Evaluates applications for seamless cloud transition.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Improved Developer Efficiency: Boosts productivity through automated workflows.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes expenses related to software maintenance.
Risk Mitigation: Reduces vulnerabilities with insightful security assessments.
Enhanced Decision Making: Supports strategic IT planning with precise data.

CAST Application Intelligence Platform is heavily utilized in industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where software quality and security are critical. Implementing its solutions allows these sectors to modernize legacy systems, ensuring compliance and streamlining operations through reliable software architecture evaluation.

CAST

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Steria, T-Systems MMS, Atos Origin, Accenture, Capgemini

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Buyer's Guide

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube

April 2026

Free Report: CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube

Find out what your peers are saying about CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Software Development Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.