CAST Highlight vs Veracode comparison

Read 207 Veracode reviews

23,090 Views
5,542 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CAST Highlight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Veracode and CAST Highlight compete in the application security testing space. Veracode seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive scanning capabilities and extensive integration options, making it a strong choice for regulatory compliance and SDLC integration.

Features: Veracode provides comprehensive static, dynamic, and manual scanning capabilities, which are crucial for regulatory compliance and SDLC integration. It supports a broad range of programming languages and offers robust integration with IDEs and APIs. Veracode is valued for its ease of use, especially its ability to minimize false positives, along with features for sandbox scanning and vulnerability management. CAST Highlight offers fast, automated code scanning and portfolio assessments, providing a high-level overview rather than the in-depth analysis delivered by Veracode.

Room for Improvement: Veracode faces issues with false positives and complex integrations, leading to potential usability and reporting problems. Improvements in scanning speeds and language support are needed. CAST Highlight is criticized for its abstract reporting and lack of detailed analysis capabilities, with its pricing model viewed as inflexible, limiting deeper analyses without significant cost.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode can be deployed across various cloud environments—public, private, and hybrid—offering adaptability but with potential complexity in implementation. While its technical support receives mixed reviews, its quick response time is praised, despite some inconsistencies. CAST Highlight shares similar support complexities and the need for potential service improvements according to its users.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode's pricing is perceived as high but justified by its comprehensive features and robust security assurances, making it less accessible for small businesses but valuable for larger enterprises in risk management and operational efficiencies. CAST Highlight is considered more cost-effective than its sibling CAST AIP, but still requires careful cost-benefit analysis. Veracode is frequently cited for delivering more measurable benefits in reducing security vulnerabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CAST Highlight vs. Veracode Report (Updated: April 2026).

CAST Highlight vs. Veracode

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CAST Highlight

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (10th), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of CAST Highlight is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 5.9%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	5.9%
CAST Highlight	1.3%
Other	92.8%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Jayanti Rode

Technical Associate Manager at Accenture

Identifies migration blockers and boosters while facing challenges with platform-specific roadblocks

The solution provides agnostic blockers for platforms as well as for containerization. Within that containerization, it offers generic blockers. However, my project might require it to provide Windows-specific blockers or Linux-specific blockers, as I often work with only one platform at a time. If I received categorization in containerization blockers, it would save time. Understanding only the OS-specific blockers means I would avoid resolving irrelevant issues, thus saving time. Initially, I receive a response from support, however, if there is involvement from R&D or other teams, it may take longer than expected. The support team is challenging when sharing source code. As this is a static code analysis tool, it sometimes requires source code for R&D. However, CAST clients may be restricted from sharing due to business logic and nondisclosure agreements. This creates a challenge, and I may have to share pseudo code or seek client approval, risking escalation.

Read full review

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Onboarding developers successfully while improving code security through IDE integration

Regarding room for improvement, we have some problems when onboarding new projects because the build process has to be done in a certain way, as Veracode analyzes the binaries and not the code by itself alone. If the process is not configured correctly, it doesn't work. That's one of the things that we are discussing with Veracode. Something positive that we've been able to do is submit formal feature requests to them, and they are working on them; they've already solved some of them. This encourages us to propose new ideas and improvements. Another improvement that we asked for this use case is to be able to configure how Veracode Fix proposes and fixes because sometimes it makes proposals using libraries that go against our architecture design made by the enterprise architecture team. For example, we want them to propose using another library, and that's something we already asked Veracode, and they are working on it. We want to specify when you see this kind of vulnerability, you can only propose these two options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of CAST Highlight are automation and speed."

"The way it tells you which codebase is more ready for the cloud and which codebase is less ready is very valuable. It works seamlessly with most languages."

"In cloud migration, I use CAST highlight to identify blockers, which are the negative road patterns, and also the boosters, which are positive code patterns."

"The solution provides agnostic blockers for platforms as well as for containerization."

"It offers good performance."

"We are using CAST Highlight for the location because it's an indicator for us that can differentiate us from the other health insurance company, and we are using the indicator as proof of the quality of service for our application."

"The most valuable features of the CAST Highlight are the interface and there are three notations that are very simple to understand and communicate with."

"We've been using it for two years and found that it is really profitable to have the product in our arsenal."

More CAST Highlight pros

"Veracode saves us a lot in terms of security, ensuring that external users or others cannot easily hack our system, which is the main motive for using Veracode."

"The solution is a specialist in SAST that you can rely on. Code scanning is fast with current, updated algorithms."

"We have had customers - and it has been our own experience as well - tell us that the support is second to none, as they are very quick to respond and very quick to answer questions in a really knowledgeable way."

"I can have quick results by just uploading compiled components."

"The source composition analysis had very good reporting."

"The product helped improve our organization by helping us to identify potential problems in applications and fix them before they were used in a way that they should not be, and in essence, it helped enhance our security."

"The solution's technical support is absolutely fantastic and very fast."

"In my experience, Veracode is one of the most powerful tools available in the market from a security perspective. It is a market leader in source code analysis."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive."

"If I received categorization in containerization blockers, it would save time."

"Technical support could be better."

"It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."

"There could be potential improvements or additional features added to CAST Highlight to make it better."

"The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight."

"There's a bit of a learning curve at the outset."

"The reports that describe the issues of concern are rather abstract and the issues should be more clearly described to the user."

More CAST Highlight cons

"When Veracode updates the pool of tests and security checks, it could be a little more transparent about what it is releasing. It's not clear what it's adding. They do thousands of checks, and when they add more, there aren't many details about what the new tests are doing."

"I would like to see them provide more content in the developer training section."

"The JIRA integration automation aspect of it could be improved significantly. We want to have a way to create tickets that are going to allow people to work through those flaws that we're finding. We don't want people to feel like they're missing out on something or that they're not following directions in the right way."

"It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool."

"It could have better integration with our pipeline. If we could have better integration with our application pipeline, e.g., Jira, Bamboo, or Azure DevOps, then that will be very helpful. Right now, it is quite hard to integrate the solution into our existing pipeline."

"While Veracode is way ahead of its competitors on Gartner Magic Quadrant, it's a bit more expensive than Fortify."

"The triage indicator was kind of hard to find. It's a very small arrow and I had no idea it was there."

"If Veracode was more diversified, as far as the number of platforms and the number of applications it could do in our favor, we would be using it even more."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution."

"It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive. The high price is part of the problem with the CAST solutions."

"Basic support is included with the standard licensing feed but it can be upgraded for an additional cost."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"Veracode is expensive. But the solution is worth it."

"I wouldn't really recommend Veracode for a small firm, because it might be a little pricey for them. But for a large organization, with more than 1,000 applications in the enterprise, there are tiered levels of pricing."

"I found Veracode very expensive, though I'm not the person paying for it. I was surprised to find out how much the subscription costs and that the executive board approved it, but it was a no-brainer because now my company has better security scans."

"The pricing depends on the functionality each client desires."

"The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions."

"Veracode's pricing is competitive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable, and relatively straightforward, and different licensing and subscription models are available."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CAST Highlight?

The pricing of CAST Highlight was not considered expensive or cheap, and no specific comment was made about the setup cost.

What needs improvement with CAST Highlight?

What is your primary use case for CAST Highlight?

For CAST, I use it in cloud migration roadmap and in open source safety issues. These are my two main use cases.

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What do you like most about Veracode Static Analysis?

I like its integration with GitHub. I like using it from GitHub. I can use the GitHub URL and find out the vulnerabilities.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

SonarQube vs CAST Highlight

Comparisons

Snyk vs CAST Highlight

Compared 15% of the time

Compared 11% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs CAST Highlight

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs CAST Highlight

Compared 7% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs CAST Highlight

Compared 6% of the time

More CAST Highlight Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Download CAST Highlight product report

CAST Highlight

May 2026

Download Veracode product report

April 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

CAST Highlight is a comprehensive platform that integrates with Azure DevOps, offering remote functionalities without direct codebase access. It quickly identifies cloud migration blockers and supports most programming languages with an easy setup.

CAST Highlight stands out with its user-friendly interface and dashboard, enabling efficient scanning for environment quality. Its automation and speed are particularly valued, making it distinct in the software analysis domain. While users encounter challenges with language-specific insights and expensive licensing, they benefit from its capability to assess code base states during mergers, acquisitions, and cloud migration planning. Technical support poses issues, and some users face hurdles with configuration customization and issue reporting clarity. Despite these challenges, CAST Highlight demonstrates effectiveness in identifying application service quality and ensuring legal, security, and IP compliance.

What features define CAST Highlight?

Seamless Integration: Works with Azure DevOps for enhanced functionality.
Remote Functionality: Operates without direct codebase access, offering flexibility.
Cloud Migration Assistance: Identifies blockers and boosters for cloud strategies.
Programming Language Support: Compatible with a wide range of languages.
Easy Setup: Simplifies the process for quick implementation.

What are the benefits of using CAST Highlight?

Speed and Automation: Delivers quick scans and automated processes for efficiency.
Application Quality Insights: Provides detailed assessments for application portfolios.
Enhanced Communication: Simple notations improve team communication.
Legal and Security Compliance: Ensures compliance insights are accessible.

CAST Highlight is adopted across industries for tasks such as assessing code during mergers, managing application portfolios, and planning cloud migrations. It facilitates open source safety checks and replatforming architectures, serving roles in firewall and storage management. Users rely on it for service quality verification and distinguishing applications from competitors.

CAST

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Bank of NY Mellon, Northern Trust, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, BMW, AT&T, US Army, US Air Force, US Navy, John Hancock, Marsh & McLennan, Ernst & Young, PwC, Volkswagen, Boston Consulting Group, London Stock Exchange, Telefonica, Saur France, Total Energies France, SNCF

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.