

Check Point Cloud Firewall and Harmony SASE are two leading products in the cloud security space, competing in threat prevention and secure web access. While both focus on security, Harmony SASE may have the upper hand because of its seamless integration and ease of use in remote work scenarios.
Features: Check Point's Cloud Firewall offers superior threat prevention with Zero-Day attack protection, effective micro-segmentation, and centralized security management tailored for hybrid environments. Harmony SASE boasts advanced secure web gateways, Zero Trust Network Access, and a unified platform for network security functions, focusing on integrated secure access and user-friendly management.
Room for Improvement: Check Point's Cloud Firewall could improve integration with Nutanix, expand public documentation, and simplify licensing and upgrade processes. Users have also noted the onboarding complexity. Harmony SASE requires enhancements in third-party integrations, real-time traffic optimization, and improvements in Zero Trust architecture for a better remote user experience.
Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloud Firewall is widely adopted across hybrid environments, providing robust scalability and centralized management, though some users have experienced slow support response times. Harmony SASE is praised for its simple deployment and seamless integration in multi-cloud environments, although initial setup can be intricate.
Pricing and ROI: Both systems offer competitive pricing, with Check Point Cloud Firewall providing a fixed-cost annual license for predictable expenses and Cloud usage scaling, potentially offering better ROI. Harmony SASE’s higher but flexible pricing supports a comprehensive feature set beneficial for seamless integration and secure remote accessibility as part of its ROI strategy.
The value lies in maintaining operational integrity with zero downtime or incidents, facilitating secure, ongoing business operations.
The compliance has improved as our overall compliance score against CIS benchmark has improved from around 72 to 92% within the first three months of adoption.
This helped my team cut manual review time by roughly twenty to twenty-five percent, allowing me to reallocate effort to proactive cloud security improvements.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
They usually respond quite fast, and they are very knowledgeable about what they do.
We had an endless loop of emails trying to fix this, and the suggestion was to reinstall the gateway and do it from scratch, which was not an option at that point because it would leave that specific location without access.
I think TAC of Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) is very competent; they really know what they are doing.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
Visibility scales without performance issues as my environment expands.
It is capable of managing the increased load and performs well as our needs expand.
I can deploy it everywhere I need it.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
The firewall itself, Gaia itself, tells you: "Look, there is this error, this problem; verify if your device is affected; if so, here is the solution."
If there are errors, it is sometimes challenging to elaborate or troubleshoot since it is not transparent enough to understand what to search for.
I have not observed any downtime.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
Scalability could be improved as well; needing to purchase a new license each time I want to add a new interface is not ideal.
Better documentation would be welcome.
The user interface could be more intuitive, and the initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a technical team.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
The pricing and licensing are expensive, costing between seven thousand to eight thousand dollars.
Check Point is expensive, however, with the features and capabilities, I can justify the cost.
It is the highest in the market.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
One of the most valuable features is the automated threat prevention, which helps us detect and block potential cyberattacks in real-time, minimizing data breaches.
Centralized management is the feature I like best, resulting in reduced workload and more continuous policy.
Network Security provides us with unified security management across hybrid and cloud as well as on-prem.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) | 2.7% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 1.1% |
| Other | 96.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 132 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
| Large Enterprise | 142 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Check Point Cloud Firewall, previously known as CloudGuard Network Security, provides advanced threat prevention, centralized management, and VPN capabilities, enabling robust cloud security across various platforms including Azure and AWS.
Check Point Cloud Firewall delivers seamless cloud integration with advanced automated threat prevention and centralized management to enhance security posture. It offers auto-scaling for dynamic environments and a comprehensive policy enforcement framework in hybrid settings. The unified interface streamlines administration across cloud infrastructures, ensuring consistent protection and reducing risk.
What important features does it offer?In manufacturing and conglomerate sectors, Check Point Cloud Firewall is utilized for protecting cloud environments and implementing network segmentation. It supports secure cloud migration on AWS, Azure, and GCP, ensuring compliance, perimeter defense, and traffic inspection, facilitating sophisticated threat prevention strategies.
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.