Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Name: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Brand: Check Point Software Technologies
Rating: 4.4 (62 reviews)

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.4 out of 5

62 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, robust security features, and a user-friendly interface, ensuring comprehensive protection and streamlined access for organizations seeking optimal network security solutions.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate is recognized for cost-effective network security and robust VPN capabilities. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless cloud integration and advanced threat prevention, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive security. Check Point's ease of deployment contrasts Fortinet's traditional setup.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate generally involves higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which provides a more budget-friendly entry point for secure networking solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate generally involves higher initial setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which provides a more budget-friendly entry point for secure networking solutions.

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense offers a flexible, resource-efficient firewall solution, appealing to those valuing cost-effectiveness and customization. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides integrated security with advanced threat intelligence, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive cloud-native solutions and centralized management.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netgate pfSense Report

Pricing

Netgate pfSense offers a cost-effective setup, while Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, involves a higher initial cost. The difference in setup expenses highlights contrasting pricing strategies and target markets between the two.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust Network Access, enhancing security without traditional VPNs, appealing to those prioritizing user access control. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates robust malware protection with Office 365, suited for those embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE demands a higher setup cost than Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE demands a higher setup cost than Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall excels in integration and budget-friendly setup, appealing to those with existing Cisco systems. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE's cloud-based services and ease of deployment attract buyers seeking simplified management and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall requires substantial initial investment for setup, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more straightforward, cost-effective setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall requires substantial initial investment for setup, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more straightforward, cost-effective setup process.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels with AI-driven threat-hunting and rollback features, offering proactive protection. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on secure access and network security, particularly strong in remote access with Zero Trust Network Access and firewall services.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers an efficient setup with reasonable costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE may have higher setup costs due to its extensive security features.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers an efficient setup with reasonable costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE may have higher setup costs due to its extensive security features.

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-layer security ideal for compliance and productivity, while Check Point Harmony SASE excels with Zero Trust Network Access, ensuring secure resource access. In comparison, Umbrella's easy management contrasts with Harmony's advanced data loss prevention features.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly solution, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE entails a higher initial investment, emphasizing its comprehensive, feature-rich capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss appeals to cost-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and strong web security features. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE attracts those seeking robust integration and extensive threat intelligence, despite higher costs, offering enhanced security and simplicity for cloud environments.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. iboss Report

Pricing

Iboss has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more economical option. Users report iboss's extensive features justify the price, while Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for affordability.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access offers strong integration with Palo Alto's security features and malware protection. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides a unified platform with Zero Trust Network Access and Secure Web Gateway. Its flexible access controls and efficient Citrix SD-WAN integration attract many tech buyers.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks offers a more comprehensive setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more economical initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks offers a more comprehensive setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more economical initial investment.

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Internet Access excels in threat protection and SSL inspection, offering superior global reach. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides a cloud-native platform with Zero Trust and centralized management, appealing to those prioritizing seamless secure access and detailed threat intelligence.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access typically involves higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more cost-efficient initial setup, highlighting distinct approaches in pricing strategy.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Internet Access typically involves higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more cost-efficient initial setup, highlighting distinct approaches in pricing strategy.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust Network Access for internal resources without a VPN. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides VPN-like Private Access. Both integrate securely with cloud and hybrid environments but differ significantly in pricing, deployment, and support.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost, allowing businesses to deploy a security solution affordably, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive security features and infrastructure.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 38 more products

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Firewalls