

MetaDefender and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in cybersecurity. Check Point Harmony SASE is more compelling due to its extensive feature set.
Features:MetaDefender includes robust threat prevention, advanced malware detection, and data sanitization technologies. Check Point Harmony SASE provides secure access, threat management, and unified endpoint security, offering a more integrated cybersecurity approach.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Check Point Harmony SASE features cloud-native deployment and an intuitive service model, simplifying access management. It also offers responsive customer support. MetaDefender requires more complex deployment processes, which can be technical.
Pricing and ROI:MetaDefender offers lower setup costs, attracting budget-conscious organizations. Check Point Harmony SASE, with its advanced features, provides a better ROI, justifying higher costs through long-term value.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
Having both cloud and on-premise solutions enables effective file sanitization and vulnerability detection while preventing attacks that save costs and protect reputation.
MetaDefender has positively impacted my organization by reducing the risk of file-based attacks, which has significantly improved our overall defense against phishing and malware delivery techniques.
I believe it is worth the money, as it brings time-saving, cost-saving, and efficiency improvements, especially in large environments.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
This can save time because many vendors, when they check something and ask for logs, need those logs from the beginning.
Their customer service team, distribution team, and regional sales managers provide excellent aftercare and set us up for upselling across the entire MetaDefender portfolio.
The technical support can be rated at 9.5 from one to 10, with 10 being the best.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
When you use one database for all instances, you can deploy ten different servers or ten different instances with a separate database for each one.
We handle vast amounts of traffic from banking, defense, and critical national infrastructure.
MetaDefender's scalability is excellent, as it handles larger volumes of file scanning without major issues.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
The stability of the system is very high.
MetaDefender is 100% stable, making it one of the best cybersecurity solutions we offer.
I find it stable as it maintains good external stability with good availability and no major issues.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
MetaDefender should have a wizard or general policies that can be used for 80 percent of customers.
Pricing is an important aspect in catering to customer budgets and is a must-have consideration for organizations.
Enhanced reporting and audit capabilities are not fully utilized.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
When someone attempted to buy from us one instance of OPSWAT, it was about nine thousand dollars for multi-scanning with eight engines and also the CDR module.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find the pricing for kiosks, cloud, deep CDR, and adaptive sandbox appropriate.
feedback indicates that our pricing is better than other vendor solutions.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
I believe this is very effective and is the most effective engine of OPSWAT because customers ask for OPSWAT for two main reasons: the CDR capabilities and the multi-scanning engines.
MetaDefender's core philosophy of trusting no file means it scans files, rebuilds them, and verifies their reputation, ensuring they contain no malicious content.
The integration of multi-scanning and Content Disarm and Reconstruction is truly helpful because we can utilize it in other products such as email integration with ICAP capability, and we are also using it in web scanning.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| MetaDefender | 2.1% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
MetaDefender provides advanced multiscanning capabilities using 30+ anti-malware engines, ensuring high detection efficacy and robust prevention mechanisms.
MetaDefender's approach combines multiple security technologies like Metascan, Deep CDR, and adaptive sandboxing. These integrated solutions offer comprehensive protection against malware and vulnerabilities, catering to cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments with enhanced performance and automation.
What are the key features of MetaDefender?
What benefits and ROI can MetaDefender offer?
MetaDefender is trusted in industries such as financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, where rigorous policy control and auditability are vital. Its diverse deployment options allow for consistent security across datacenters, OT networks, and secure facilities, meeting stringent compliance needs.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.