OpenVPN Access Server and Perimeter 81 are two prominent VPN solutions. Users generally prefer OpenVPN Access Server for its affordability and strong support, but Perimeter 81 stands out with superior features and user satisfaction, justifying its higher cost.
Features: OpenVPN Access Server is valued for its robust security protocols, extensive control options, and reliable performance. Perimeter 81 offers advanced cloud integration, a comprehensive network security suite, and seamless user management.
Room for Improvement: OpenVPN Access Server users request a more streamlined setup process, enhanced mobile app functionality, and a more intuitive interface. Perimeter 81 users seek better reporting tools, minor interface tweaks, and improved analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenVPN Access Server is praised for its straightforward deployment in standard IT environments and responsive customer service. Perimeter 81 offers easy deployment, particularly in cloud-first environments, with highly responsive support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenVPN Access Server is recognized for its lower setup costs and solid ROI. Perimeter 81 has higher initial costs but provides significant user satisfaction and long-term value, indicating a competitive ROI despite the premium pricing.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
The support team needs to be more effective and responsive to clear issues more promptly.
I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
The connectivity issue can be improved as at times it lags when connecting to their server.
OpenVPN could improve in centralized management.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is a bit expensive.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
Check Point reveals and segregates everything like CCTV, laptops, desktops, mobile phones, and printers into different tabular columns, making it easy to identify each device and the IP assigned to it.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based network security and software-defined perimeter (SDP) solution designed to provide secure access to resources in the cloud, data centers, and on-premises environments. It offers a unified platform for organizations to manage and secure their network infrastructure, regardless of the location or type of resources.
Perimeter 81 Benefits:
Perimeter 81 Features:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user, Frontend Developer at Limelight Networks, states that "We use some VPN solutions, and Perimeter 81 has the best user experience for desktop or mobile".
Daniel Goldfeld, Vice President of Customer Success at Mine - The All-in-One Privacy Suite, says that Perimeter 81 has "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions".
Another PeerSpot user, Accounts Payable Specialist at Simera, writes that "The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."
OpenVPN Access Server is a comprehensive VPN solution that enables secure remote access and site-to-site connectivity. It uses the open-source OpenVPN protocol with added encryption and authentication for robust security. The web-based admin interface simplifies setup and centralized management of users, devices, and access controls.
OpenVPN Access Server's ease of setup, comprehensive security features, and professional support make it a viable option for businesses looking to facilitate secure remote access and inter-office connectivity. However, potential users should be mindful of the technical requirements for setup and the possibility of network performance issues in specific scenarios.
Based on over 30 independent peer reviews, OpenVPN garners consistently positive feedback for its stability, security, and free open-source licensing. The most common complaints relate to initial setup complexity and occasional connection drops. Despite these drawbacks, most reviewers highly recommend OpenVPN Access Server due to its robust encryption standards, flexible access options, and scalability across organization sizes.
Versatile Installation and Client Support:
User Authentication and Security:
Flexible Access Control and Tunneling Options:
OpenVPN offers professional support for Access Server, with a global team of experts available through an online ticket system. This ensures that users have timely access to assistance when needed.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.